Antidisestablishmentarian
Well-Known Member
Good there were no longer term effects. That's just too scary.
Women's Libido..Uncle Sugar and Mike Huckabee..GOP's Mansplanation on Women..
- Thread starter schuylaar
- Start date
Doer
Well-Known Member
But, but, but.....
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
a man who gets as much ass as a toilet seat should probably have his junk laminated in at least 30 mil poly.
skunkd0c
Well-Known Member
In rides a gallant chivalrous White Knight .. "I shall protect thee.. fair maidens"
I am glad you said Horse (stupid beast) and not Dog (mans best friend)
peace
hey us american girls know our place turn of the century circa 1920's when we first got the vote..can you believe that?
skunkd0c
Well-Known Member
random thought > One of the many cultural differences i have discovered is American girls are much more willing to deep throat ..
on the voting thing .. that is shocking i would of waited until at least 2050 to let you vote for the best looking suit lol
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
I'm just curious as to what the democratic party will do to help bring equality for women. I keep hearing about the GOP's war on women. I can't help but to think that this is simply empty rhetoric designed to create a "you're a misogynist" card to use on those who don't support Hillary Clinton. So aside from calling people misogynists whether correctly or not, how will electing another neoliberal imperialist be a step toward equality for women?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
This is an excellent question.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Misogyny exists. And I see it about equal for both Parties. But, all politics is Lies.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
I would call you captain obvious if I thought you could hold such a rank. Private First Class Obvious, has a ring to it.
MidwesternGro
Well-Known Member
Wrong. In 2012, 12 women won in Democratic Primaries for senate vs. only 6 for Republican. The house female candidates were 118 democrats vs. 48 republicans. Furthermore, females in the Democratic party had far higher winning percentages in primaries -- meaning that the Democratic party is far less misogynistic. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/levels_of_office/Congress-HistoricalInfo.php
every single time the GOP opens their mouth to try to "win over" women they just keep making it worse..can you imagine what a 21 year old girl thinks when she hears this rhetoric?..man, obama had it right when he targeted whole colleges this past election
Doer
Well-Known Member
It is kinda funny. I don't see less misogynistic, for either party. I see only slightly less misogynistic, for the USA, these days. And the world is still going to hell about this.
But, I will say, beyond the individuals, the DEMS have a much less misogynistic stance. I sincerely doubt the motive of the men in the party, any Party. OTH, we know the single motive of Men. To Seed.
But, to me the stance of the women in the PUBS is de-facto misogyny. The stance of PUBS seems to be a separate but equal thing. That does not work.
But, I will say, beyond the individuals, the DEMS have a much less misogynistic stance. I sincerely doubt the motive of the men in the party, any Party. OTH, we know the single motive of Men. To Seed.
But, to me the stance of the women in the PUBS is de-facto misogyny. The stance of PUBS seems to be a separate but equal thing. That does not work.
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Doer again.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
funny how the left assumes we are all stupid.
first woman elected to the US congress, way back in 1917.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeannette_Rankin
REPUBLICAN
the tendency of conservative women to not run for office is not proof of misogyny, you dolt.
the first woman in the senate was a democrat, but they dont like to talk about her...
"Very much a woman of the Old South, Felton and her husband owned slaves until the end of US Civil War. He represented Georgia's 7th District in the US Congress from 1875-81, and as a 19th century politician's wife she acted as his unofficial office and campaign manager. Well-known and well-liked in Georgia political circles, in 1899 she began writing a regular column in the Atlanta Journal. She wrote about farm life, proper manners for young people, and sometimes included her political perspectives in a time when women rarely spoke of such things -- gently supporting women's rights while more ardently arguing against unions, for repeal of child labor laws, and for the lynching of black men to protect white women from the wildly exaggerated danger of rape."
~http://www.nndb.com/people/329/000112990/
lulz.
assclowns everywhere.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that might actually have the slightest of stings if it wasn't nearly a century old.
the republican party was great if you look back a century or so.
now, the pathetic shit stains of the republican party that remain circling the bowl are racist birchers like yourself, all out idiots like beenthere, red and NLXSK1, illiterate halfwits like thecoolman and nontheist, and closeted KKKers like sirgreenthumb and desert dude.
misogyny, xenophobia, racism, islamaphobia and hatred are the de facto platform of the republican party now. applauding the death of uninsured people, booing gay soldiers, cheering the death penalty...just sad what you guys have devolved into.