Why do you reject the theory of evolution?

Someacdude

Active Member
Because there are still monkeys..


Humans seem to be devolving..
The missing link is indeed a lie, it has never and will never be found. Every time some scientist tries to claim it, it turns out to either be a hoax like piltdown man or some other mistake.
Science wants to BE GOD , much like Doctors , there is no missing link in the fossil record , in fact ti doesnt exist.
Looking at it from a creationist standpoint, If the Bible is correct and mankind chose to believe they can be like God as the serpent tempted Eve, yes we are thousands of years removed from our original human birth parents , makes perfect sense.

Science is a lie in many cases. The sell pills instead of better diet , they crave notoriety and fame, many are unhappy and if creationism is mentioned , the scientific community has a tendency to try and destroy that person, and thats a cold hard FACT.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
The missing link is indeed a lie, it has never and will never be found. Every time some scientist tries to claim it, it turns out to either be a hoax like piltdown man or some other mistake.
Science wants to BE GOD , much like Doctors , there is no missing link in the fossil record , in fact ti doesnt exist.
Looking at it from a creationist standpoint, If the Bible is correct and mankind chose to believe they can be like God as the serpent tempted Eve, yes we are thousands of years removed from our original human birth parents , makes perfect sense.

Science is a lie in many cases. The sell pills instead of better diet , they crave notoriety and fame, many are unhappy and if creationism is mentioned , the scientific community has a tendency to try and destroy that person, and thats a cold hard FACT.
Science is simply a tool we use to explain the world, it doesn't (and can't) "want" anything

Anyone who espouses creationism in a professional or academic setting should be destroyed, just like anyone who denied the holocaust
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
Because all we see around us is micro evolution. Changing size, and different genetic traits, but there is no proof of macro evolution.
I don't follow a faith but i do believe we were designed.

that is like getting on the 10 in California and being told, "well, you can go to Texas but you will never get to Florida. Evidence is everywhere, even in your own body.
 

eye exaggerate

Well-Known Member
Science is simply a tool we use to explain the world, it doesn't (and can't) "want" anything

Anyone who espouses creationism in a professional or academic setting should be destroyed, just like anyone who denied the holocaust
Based on what criteria? Please post one that still isn't waiting for answers to unsolved questions in order to make it complete.

Good luck

Why don't you guys try to tackle some of those instead of people who have learned to describe their inner world with terms that make you uncomfortable?

Matter has an inner world, we can't fully describe it yet.

People, made of matter, also have an inner world that we are trying our best to describe.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
The missing link is indeed a lie, it has never and will never be found. Every time some scientist tries to claim it, it turns out to either be a hoax like piltdown man or some other mistake.
Science wants to BE GOD , much like Doctors , there is no missing link in the fossil record , in fact ti doesnt exist.
Looking at it from a creationist standpoint, If the Bible is correct and mankind chose to believe they can be like God as the serpent tempted Eve, yes we are thousands of years removed from our original human birth parents , makes perfect sense.

Science is a lie in many cases. The sell pills instead of better diet , they crave notoriety and fame, many are unhappy and if creationism is mentioned , the scientific community has a tendency to try and destroy that person, and thats a cold hard FACT.
there is no "missing link" because that is not how evolution works. And science is not evolution any more than religeon is God. Your argument is made from ignorance of both evolution, science and religion.
 

eye exaggerate

Well-Known Member
If the natural world is complete, how can you properly assess its advantages and disadvantages with a fragmented view? Imagine a person at the helm of scientific endeavour using terms like 'destroy' to describe a task. It is no longer about science and more about mentality.

"us" - study from the inside out.

"them" - study from the outside in.

I can't see a difference, I really can't.
 

Wilksey

Well-Known Member
Ah the hubris of man.


Intelligence is not necessary for survival as many many unintelligent orgnisms have been around and thrived for far longer than we. What is "necessary" for survival is an adpativity to that creature's surroundings. Ants are not very intelligen but adherence to a few simple rules have managed have them do quite well.

As for the rest? do you understand the complex communications of trees? whales? other primates? We did not turn out so different than any of our primate cousins or any other mammal either The polar bear is quite comfortable with his furs in the deepest of winters. I can imagine the highly intelligent crow wondering from his high purch or his glide over us all "how is it that man never evolved to fly, after all flight enables us to travel hundreds of miles in a day for our food, and to escape our predators".

It is all a matter of persepctive.
I agree with pretty much all of that, however, I can find no logical conclusion that would allow for our species, ALONE, to develop the ability to understand and manipulate fire when we did.

It just doesn't make sense.

Compare any biological species within a genus and you find that the intelligence levels are relatively streamlined, as is the use of tools, if any. This shows that nature is a lazy bitch that likes to repeat herself, and this repetition is also reflected in the cosmos, as evidenced by the multitude of stars and galaxies that share many of the same characteristics. Why did OUR species deviate from the "norms" found in nature when we came from the very same nature that produced everything else?

Polar bears, hell, BEARS developed fat layers and fur to keep warm. That makes sense and jives with everything else in nature. Humans, however, developed clothing and the use of fire instead. That's not natural, and no other species on the planet took that route. That intellectual and technological leap just seems far too large to be "natural", as no other species took that same route, or has taken it since.

The seemingly "exceptional" route our species has taken seems way, way, WAY out of place compared with our peers in the animal kingdom, and it is this "exceptionalism" that leads me to believe that evolution is only PART of the story concerning our species.

Granted, I could very well be giving our species FAR more credit than we deserve concerning "intelligence", but it seems to me that we are the proverbial square peg on a planet of round holes.
 

Someacdude

Active Member
Science is simply a tool we use to explain the world, it doesn't (and can't) "want" anything

Anyone who espouses creationism in a professional or academic setting should be destroyed, just like anyone who denied the holocaust
Really, well im guessing its ok to the theory of evolution to well, just about anyone. Science is not a tool, its BIG BUSINESS, its also man kinds excuse for so many evil deeds.
 

Someacdude

Active Member
there is no "missing link" because that is not how evolution works. And science is not evolution any more than religeon is God. Your argument is made from ignorance of both evolution, science and religion.
And your argument is ,,,,nothing? Just a vague rebuttal of someone elses view, kinda like,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,evolution?
I didnt come up with the missing link, and if that fairy tale has been proven wrong what did they come up with next? The big bang.

Lets do an experiment.
Go into your grow room and explode every seed one at a time , get back to me on what percentage became 'alive' oh yeah, first ,,,,,make your own seeds out of nothing.
Ignorance indeed.
 

thump easy

Well-Known Member
[video=youtube_share;eYDwWbDhCEg]http://youtu.be/eYDwWbDhCEg[/video]im dead serious just watch im not joking the sequence is from a creator a grid.. the blue print of a matrix... to be or not to be, do you understand!! call me crazzy but the grid is real matrix homie the matrix.. that shit is real as a mother fucker!!!!i believe in the sequence it is math it is how my buds are formed if only i could read the seqence to understand the forieghn languege i could repair cells or break cancer split the cells play with the cells make it and read it like a book...fix aids and any kind of disorders their gota be a way it has to be posable the manipulation is possable it comen scence just cant read the langueage..
 

thump easy

Well-Known Member
[video=youtube;De0EsBwG91k]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=De0EsBwG91k&list=PLPpmoO9v2RoNmGDYDw2FBRpb h2QrJHXfC&feature=share[/video]this one is a lil more well explained..
 

thump easy

Well-Known Member
[video=youtube;ktLcSH4UkpE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktLcSH4UkpE&list=PLPpmoO9v2RoNmGDYDw2FBRpb h2QrJHXfC&feature=share&index=7[/video]
 

thump easy

Well-Known Member
[video=youtube;KpBfbzxS1l4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpBfbzxS1l4&feature=share&list=PLPpmoO9v2R oNmGDYDw2FBRpbh2QrJHXfC&index=8[/video]well that just my opionion thank you for taking the time to see what lingers in my brain..
 

Heisenberg

Well-Known Member
"The Aquatic Ape Theory says humans went through an aquatic or semi-aquatic stage in our evolution and that this accounts for many features seen in human anatomy and physiology. Using the principle of convergent evolution, it says that life in an aquatic environment explains these features, and that a transition from ape to hominid in a non-aquatic environment cannot.

This web page offers a critical examination of the Aquatic Ape Theory, treating it as a serious scientific theory."

http://www.aquaticape.org/
 
Top