White Supremacist Takes DNA Test

abandonconflict said:
You insinuate this sentiment in almost every post.
Click to expand...

AC, I have to disagree with you. You have your hackles extended so far that you are sensing insinuations that aren't there.

I realize that the doctor writes with a flourish and being on the receiving end of his barbs must be painful, but you need to argue the points as written, not the points you "really know, deep down, he believes."
 
abandonconflict said:
You insinuate this sentiment in almost every post.
Click to expand...

really?

"Insinuate" it?

or do you mean i "Imply" it?

when in fact you are Inferring it.

it seems to me that you complain because i clearly elucidate my views, which results in your tired old refrain "TLDR"

meanwhile, you prefer to cast out slogans, bumperstickers, and Marxist propaganda while NEVER defining your position.

your position may be shrouded in mystery, but it's borders have been clearly defined by your own words.

everyone can clearly see the secret you are trying so hard to conceal is in fact just Marxism wrapped in a dense fog of Chompskyite rhetoric.
 
abandonconflict said:
The only thing that Asians and Europeans have evolved more quickly than everyone else is immunity to epidemics. Despite what you want to believe, they are not genetically superior nor do they have inherent cognitive superiority. The reason why you have this fallacious sociological view, is that you think survival of the fittest is an apt description of natural selection. This makes you a social darwinist.

Instead of trying to redefine every word I used in my argument and limit what words I am allowed to use, you should fall back to your other favorite tactics, like lying, and distorting my arguments and maybe insulting Noam Chomsky. I think that might work better for you.
Click to expand...

Europeans seem to have a greater immunity to AIDS, maybe because Europeans were exposed the Bubonic Plague in the middle ages: the ones who did not die had a naturally occurring mutation that helped them cope with the plague, and the same mutation apparently helps against AIDS, thus succeeding generations of Europeans got that resistant genome.

Caucasians are more susceptible to Shingles than Africans. I don't know why, but it is obviously a genetic thing.

When you subject any population of living things to a mortal challenge, some will fare better than others because of the pure randomness (luck) of mutations. The resistant live, the non-resistant die: the next generation is left better able to cope. This is true of all populations, at all times.

Interesting article about the evolution of yeast in a controlled, non challenging environment. Even in this environment the natural world lives by the slogan, "onward and upward".
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn24588-perfection-is-a-myth-reveal-50000-yeast-generations.html
 
desert dude said:
AC, I have to disagree with you. You have your hackles extended so far that you are sensing insinuations that aren't there.
Click to expand...

Or maybe you're defending him by playing stupid. makes sense, since he just went off on a tantrum to derail the thread where you said this:
Slaves... not such a big deal, really. Black slaves were also owned by some freed black men. They were also a hot commodity amongst Native Americans and quite common. They were also a top selling commodity amongst Africans. They are also still owned in the mid east.
Click to expand...
Pro-tip: your heckles are extended.
 
desert dude said:
AC, I have to disagree with you. You have your hackles extended so far that you are sensing insinuations that aren't there.

I realize that the doctor writes with a flourish and being on the receiving end of his barbs must be painful, but you need to argue the points as written, not the points you "really know, deep down, he believes."
Click to expand...

yes, my words make a picture, and it's no secret what they mean:

popart_reagan.jpg


but AC's also draw a picture.
his is a little harder to piece together, but i think i have found the hidden code:

jo-d-100421-che.png
 
Impman said:
You believe this and you are republican? I had you pegged as a Christian for sure, mind blown.....
Click to expand...

I am a very forgiving atheist, and a "small l" libertarian, i.e. social liberal, fiscal conservative: fuck whoever you want, just don't expect me to pay for your condoms.
 
rotterdam said:
Scientifically, race actually isn't real :confused:. It's a social archetype that developed from the social darwinist movement in the 1800's. genetically, we are actually all pretty much the same. the reason it says sub-saharan Africa is because there are ethnicities with common genomes that he probably shares with many people from cultures in that area. mind blown?
Click to expand...

the word race is just another tool to help us classify our world, genetic markers we can talk about but race isnt real

i agree

saying we are different races becuase of genetics expressions and genetic history is like saying people who are bald or get cancer as a family are a different race

it is caste , and status based entirely

to funny people don't realize(geographically speaking) that we all have about 99% more in common then we do apart

but some how the minute visual differences between us seem to take the driver seat over fact and function

pathetic...but expected

cant have little man syndrome without a bigger dude to make him self conscious

but still pathetic
 
desert dude said:
libertarian, i.e. social liberal, fiscal conservative
Click to expand...

terrible definition

in fact, "social liberal fiscal conservative", is probably the best definition for fedora wearing austerity brony

A libertarian is an advocate of liberty and libertarianism (the antonym of authoritarianism) is the doctrine of free will. There is no "fiscally conservative" there.
 
desert dude said:
No, I will say something completely rational and your irrational mind will "hear" something racist. There is a big difference.
Click to expand...

like this?
Slaves... not such a big deal, really. Black slaves were also owned by some freed black men. They were also a hot commodity amongst Native Americans and quite common. They were also a top selling commodity amongst Africans. They are also still owned in the mid east.
Click to expand...
 
desert dude said:
I am a very forgiving atheist, and a "small l" libertarian, i.e. social liberal, fiscal conservative: fuck whoever you want, just don't expect me to pay for your condoms.
Click to expand...
libertarian .....oh boy....do you know what a libertarian is? Better question: Do you understand Negative Rights and Positive Rights? Do you understand the Social Contract theory as presented by James Madison ?
 
abandonconflict said:
terrible definition

in fact, "social liberal fiscal conservative", is probably the best definition for fedora wearing austerity brony

A libertarian is an advocate of liberty and libertarianism (the antonym of authoritarianism) is the doctrine of free will. There is no "fiscally conservative" there.
Click to expand...

If a hat doesn't fit my head, I don't wear it. I am free to describe my own philosophical beliefs. "Social liberal, fiscal conservative" is about as close as I can get, but I reserve the right to disagree about any particular point. I think many libertarians would self describe in the exact same way.
 
Samwell Seed Well said:
did DD say that? what was the context seems odd even for him
Click to expand...

theres a reason why he didnt link to the post, it was in the context of George Washington, and at the time of GW, owning slaves was NOT a big deal (for the slave owners at least) it was entirely non-controversial.

desert dude said:
The murder charge is disputed by many historians. Never the less, this is the first I have heard of it, so, for that, I thank you.

Slaves... not such a big deal, really. Black slaves were also owned by some freed black men. They were also a hot commodity amongst Native Americans and quite common. They were also a top selling commodity amongst Africans. They are also still owned in the mid east.
Click to expand...

AC is once again attempting to re-frame somebody's comments outside of their context to create a strawman argument.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
CNN Story on white supremacists taking over town
3 4 5
Replies
98
Views
4K
kelly4
kelly4
SxIstew
Prevention and Treatment of Powdery Mildew from Mandalaseed.com
Replies
3
Views
5K
Magic M
Magic M
Blitzedgrowkid08
A must read for serious breeders!!!
Replies
8
Views
2K
racerboy71
racerboy71
stonedmetalhead1
Arjan's mystical fairy tales, read if you need a laugh.
Replies
12
Views
2K
The Mantis
T
bsemaj
James E. Barber Sr. v. City of Vancouver et.al.
Replies
5
Views
2K
bsemaj
bsemaj
Back
Top