What.....The...Fuck. he's only helping the wounded, shoot him

HAGGIS N HASH

HAGGIS N HASH

Well-Known Member
tip top toker said:
lol, what do you mean con sequences of fucking with the USA? you went to war with them for no apparent reason, just figured what the fuck, lie to the people get in some gun time! you are also aware that that "RPG " happens to be in the same vague location as the cameraman walked to?

and yeah sambo, it does, but i just read this, and if i read about another one, i'd be infuriated by that as well. that amount of tech at hand and you can't distinguish a fucking large camera to an assault rifle. come on.

my family happens to be friends with prominent UK officials and journalists, and all i'll say is all they ever have to say about ANY of the US servicemen they encountered was how gungho they are and that's not me just internet bullshitgging for sake of argument, i don't do that, why bother. they honestly stated to us that all they saw from US perosnlle was a fuck yeah attitude.

before you all forget, the world really doesn't like you as a country :) and for some reason, which you've yet to take in, it's not "their fault" it's yours.

and i don't give two damns who you or i or anyone is. if a party/agency/military yada yada in power does something like this i'll call a WTF on it, i'm not gonna sit here defending the UK either
Click to expand...

I agree mate,this is just bullshit.Does not surprise me after all the things I read bout the American gov.Opium running,crack supplied to the hoods of LA,oil wars.I dont know why we are still over there?Wasteof money and lives.I like the states,but the government there is dodgy as fuck.This stupid wars went on long enough saddams dead.They just cut down innocent ppl for nothing
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
We expect Europe to whine.... this is not a surprise to anyone. :peace:

Your continent has been bombed out twice....by your own hands in a century.

We understand.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
CrackerJax said:
We expect Europe to whine.... this is not a surprise to anyone. :peace:

Your continent has been bombed out twice....by your own hands in a century.

We understand.
Click to expand...

You expect Europe to whine because you're a little bitch.

How can you constantly be so disrespectful to Europe having roots in the fucking continent? Did you ever consider that one?... :o
 
RichiRich

RichiRich

Active Member
Padawanbater2 said:
You expect Europe to whine because you're a little bitch.

How can you constantly be so disrespectful to Europe having roots in the fucking continent? Did you ever consider that one?... :o
Click to expand...
Damn right.

CrackerJax said:
We expect Europe to whine.... this is not a surprise to anyone. :peace:

Your continent has been bombed out twice....by your own hands in a century.

We understand.
Click to expand...

And I suspect Wall Street and all those banker cunts in America had nothing to do with financing it, eh?



You twat.

-Rich
 
ColoradoLove

ColoradoLove

Well-Known Member
RichiRich said:
you keep talking about Al Qaeda and Hamas - which is funny because they have FUCK ALL to do with Iraq.

but like I said - they have nada to do with Iraq.
Click to expand...
Ding ding ding! We have a winner! I was tempted to drop that bomb on CrackerJax earlier but I chose to leave that ace up my sleeve.

What do all Americans and Saddam Hussein have in common?

They both HATE Al Qaeda!

If you do any reading on Saddam you will find that he DID NOT TOLERATE Al Qaeda operating in his country. Other terrorist cells? Sure. But he specifically hunted out and killed any Al Qaeda leaders he could find. The awesome part about us invading Iraq is that once we removed Saddam, Al Qaeda started popping back up in Iraq!
 
RichiRich

RichiRich

Active Member
ColoradoLove said:
Ding ding ding! We have a winner! I was tempted to drop that bomb on CrackerJax earlier but I chose to leave that ace up my sleeve.

What do all Americans and Saddam Hussein have in common?

They both HATE Al Qaeda!

If you do any reading on Saddam you will find that he DID NOT TOLERATE Al Qaeda operating in his country. Other terrorist cells? Sure. But he specifically hunted out and killed any Al Qaeda leaders he could find. The awesome part about us invading Iraq is that once we removed Saddam, Al Qaeda started popping back up in Iraq!
Click to expand...
Indeed - that is very true.

Although I don't really believe in "Al Qaeda's" existnce - there are people on the ground, who do carry out these terrorist attacks.

Now you have to ask yourself - what does it matter, if the guy carrying the bomb is a Muslim from Egypt or a green fucking alien from Mars?

I think what really needs to be asked here is who is training this person for the attack? Who gets him the necessary intel to carry it out? Who provides him with the explosives? The contacts? How does he get into the country? How the hell does he get through security?

All these questions, once answered with some common sense, point in the direction of the victim's own government.

It is hard to visualise 9/11 and 7/11 having been organised only by fanatic Muslims with beards who hide in caves.

There are rats in every government, who pull the necessary strings allowing attacks to happen so they can push forth political agenda. It's one of the oldest tricks in the book.

You terrorise the people and then get them to support your solution to the problem. aka : 9/11 led to a "War on Terror". This "War on Terror" led to an Invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq.

(By the way, I find it hard to see how war does not bring terror with it)

Whether it's to get oil or make weapons contractors rich - it's simply a dirty game, and when you fall victim to the bullshit they feed the sheep you end up losing your human values and defending cold blooded murder.

Just because the man with a gun is wearing a uniform, it does not mean his actions bear an ounce of honour.




-Rich
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
I used Hama as an example of a terrorist org. (which they are) ... never said they were in Iraq or connected to them (that would be Iran)... :roll:

If you don't think Iraq and Al Queda were linked and in deirect battle with US military forces.... ur insane and should get some therapy.

Osama Bin laden himself called the Iraq war the CENTRAL FRONT OF AL QUEDA... I'm sorry id that is what you were holding (?? very odd) ...but no need... you are 100% incorrect.

Bin Laden isn't a good enough source for you? :lol: Iraq.... Al Queda ... linked....humiliated.....pushed out......victory.
 
RichiRich

RichiRich

Active Member
CrackerJax said:
I used Hama as an example of a terrorist org. (which they are) ... never said they were in Iraq or connected to them (that would be Iran)... :roll:

If you don't think Iraq and Al Queda were linked and in deirect battle with US military forces.... ur insane and should get some therapy.

Osama Bin laden himself called the Iraq war the CENTRAL FRONT OF AL QUEDA... I'm sorry id that is what you were holding (?? very odd) ...but no need... you are 100% incorrect.

Bin Laden isn't a good enough source for you? :lol: Iraq.... Al Queda ... linked....humiliated.....pushed out......victory.
Click to expand...
1) No, it is not I who needs therapy, it is you who needs education

2) How the hell is Iraq the central front of Al Qaeda? On what do you base that conclusion? It's ridiculous.

"Al Qaeda" fights a war abroad, on American and British soil. Its job is to terrorise us at home, not in Iraq.

3) Osama Bin Laden is in the Taliban... Which again, has nothing to do with Al Qaeda or Iraq.

What a fool you've made of yourself - these are the most basic of facts lol

:spew:

-Rich
 
DevilishlyKatt

DevilishlyKatt

Active Member
CrackerJax said:
Osama said it ... not me.... i'm just more informed on the issue.
Click to expand...
Whoa... pack it in man. I can't say quit while you're ahead cuz you are just WAY past that. But do yourself a favor and give up on this, you clearly are completely uneducated/brainwashed over anything to do with this war... Seriously I don't know whether to giggle at the hamster that is dead and cobweb covered on the wheel of your mind or weep for humanity over the horror that is the future of what once WAS great country...
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
Unaware he said it huh... I'm shocked.


This is from 2006...meaning you have had 4 years to make usrself INFORMED..... fail.

The early speculation in the blogosphere that bin Laden ignored Iraq wholesale has proven incorrect. Osama did address Iraq's place in al Qaeda's plans and the country's importance in the global jihad. Last fall, Ayman al-Zawahiri stated Iraq is the central front in the war and referred to the country as "the place for the greatest battle of Islam in this era." bin Laden agrees:
The epicentre of these wars is Baghdad, the seat of the khalifate rule. They keep reiterating that success in Baghdad will be success for the US, failure in Iraq the failure of the US. Their defeat in Iraq will mean defeat in all their wars and a beginning to the receding of their Zionist-Crusader tide against us. Your mujahidin sons and brothers in Iraq have taught the US a hard lesson while in the fourth year of the Crusaders' invasion, they are steadfast and patient and keep killing and wounding enemy soldiers every day.
It is a duty for the Umma with all its categories, men, women and youths, to give away themselves, their money, experiences and all types of material support, enough to establish jihad in the fields of jihad particularly in Iraq, Palestine, Afghanistan, Sudan, Kashmir and Chechnya. Jihad today is an imperative for every Muslim. The Umma will commit sin if it did not provide adequate material support for jihad.
​
Osama bin Laden is correct when he states "success in Baghdad will be success for the US, failure in Iraq the failure of the US." It is imperative for the United States to make Iraq an Iraqi fight, and continue to encourage the political process while building up the capabilities of the security forces. The Iraqis are increasingly hunting and fighting al Qaeda, as the terrorist tactics and Taliban rule of law are seen as foreign influences designed to tear the Iraqi nation apart. Insurgent groups in Anbar province, no friends of the Americans, have formed the Anbar Revenge Brigade to rid al Qaeda from the region. This is but the latest development of "red-on-red" fighting between the insurgency and al Qaeda.
The Iraqi Muslims' willingness to fight al Qaeda in Iraq is an ideological dimension of the war that is virtually being ignored. al Qaeda, however, recognizes how a stable Iraq threatens the plan to establish a regional and ultimately global Islamist caliphate. Note how bin Laden fears the establishment of democratic institutions, media outlets and U.S. basing in the region. For these reasons, bin Laden calls Iraq the "epicentre of these wars" and Zawahiri calls it "the place for the greatest battle of Islam in this era."

====================================================================


So much for you....shuffle off....troll.

​
 
SocataSmoker

SocataSmoker

Well-Known Member
Like I initially said... thread gone FULL RETARD!

LOL.

I agree with what that one guy said, media doesn't need to be in war... it's dirty, nasty and when the hug-a-terrorist pussies get ahold of a video like this, THIS is what happens... idiocy.
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
Conclusions are EASY to come by.

Correct conclusions....not so easy.

If you don't bother to be up on the issue.... it's impossible. Like DK.

ahem...here's some more DK.... :roll:

Many discussing the front page news that there are internal divisions within al Qaeda and the much discussed breaks with al Qaeda by influential former supporters have largely missed the point. These are breaks over tactics, not over goals. In other words, these criticisms of al Qaeda from within and without are not about the short term goal of creating Islamic states modeled after the Taliban, nor are they about the longer term goal of the reestablishment of the Caliphate. They are discussions over whether intentionally killing civilians is moral. Or they are discussions over whether or not such tactics are practical. Others question the tactical decision by al Qaeda to turn Iraq into the central front in its war against the U.S. (2008)
 
DevilishlyKatt

DevilishlyKatt

Active Member
CrackerJax said:
Unaware he said it huh... I'm shocked.


This is from 2006...meaning you have had 4 years to make usrself INFORMED..... fail.

The early speculation in the blogosphere that bin Laden ignored Iraq wholesale has proven incorrect. Osama did address Iraq's place in al Qaeda's plans and the country's importance in the global jihad. Last fall, Ayman al-Zawahiri stated Iraq is the central front in the war and referred to the country as "the place for the greatest battle of Islam in this era." bin Laden agrees:
The epicentre of these wars is Baghdad, the seat of the khalifate rule. They keep reiterating that success in Baghdad will be success for the US, failure in Iraq the failure of the US. Their defeat in Iraq will mean defeat in all their wars and a beginning to the receding of their Zionist-Crusader tide against us. Your mujahidin sons and brothers in Iraq have taught the US a hard lesson while in the fourth year of the Crusaders' invasion, they are steadfast and patient and keep killing and wounding enemy soldiers every day.
It is a duty for the Umma with all its categories, men, women and youths, to give away themselves, their money, experiences and all types of material support, enough to establish jihad in the fields of jihad particularly in Iraq, Palestine, Afghanistan, Sudan, Kashmir and Chechnya. Jihad today is an imperative for every Muslim. The Umma will commit sin if it did not provide adequate material support for jihad.
​
Osama bin Laden is correct when he states "success in Baghdad will be success for the US, failure in Iraq the failure of the US." It is imperative for the United States to make Iraq an Iraqi fight, and continue to encourage the political process while building up the capabilities of the security forces. The Iraqis are increasingly hunting and fighting al Qaeda, as the terrorist tactics and Taliban rule of law are seen as foreign influences designed to tear the Iraqi nation apart. Insurgent groups in Anbar province, no friends of the Americans, have formed the Anbar Revenge Brigade to rid al Qaeda from the region. This is but the latest development of "red-on-red" fighting between the insurgency and al Qaeda.
The Iraqi Muslims' willingness to fight al Qaeda in Iraq is an ideological dimension of the war that is virtually being ignored. al Qaeda, however, recognizes how a stable Iraq threatens the plan to establish a regional and ultimately global Islamist caliphate. Note how bin Laden fears the establishment of democratic institutions, media outlets and U.S. basing in the region. For these reasons, bin Laden calls Iraq the "epicentre of these wars" and Zawahiri calls it "the place for the greatest battle of Islam in this era."

====================================================================


So much for you....shuffle off....troll.

​
Click to expand...
Sweet, so you copy pasted part of an article off The War Journal by Bill Roggio... an American commentator on military affairs? His OPINION since he has no authority in regards to anything has what to do with... what? Do you have any credible thoughts that are actually yours? Let's hear something that isn't regurgitated off the news or internet mate.
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
Thanks for the apology. Glad you can see when you have misspoken!!

So when I am telling you what Osama has said... you want me to tell you in an original form?

Lookey here whelp.... I TOLD you in the FIRST place in my OWN words.... you called me a TROLL.

THEN....

I go FIND the QUOTES and clear INTENT that Al Queda considered IRAQ to be the CENTRAL FRONT.... which means... drum roll...I was, with my ORIGINAL THOUGHTS .... 100% CORRECT and you were 100% INCORRECT.

So I gave it to you BOTH ways.... and guess what... You are wrong BOTH times!!

You are a .... oh what's the word? oh yah.... a TROLL.

educate urself.
 
DevilishlyKatt

DevilishlyKatt

Active Member
CrackerJax said:
Conclusions are EASY to come by.

Correct conclusions....not so easy.

If you don't bother to be up on the issue.... it's impossible. Like DK.

ahem...here's some more DK.... :roll:

Many discussing the front page news that there are internal divisions within al Qaeda and the much discussed breaks with al Qaeda by influential former supporters have largely missed the point. These are breaks over tactics, not over goals. In other words, these criticisms of al Qaeda from within and without are not about the short term goal of creating Islamic states modeled after the Taliban, nor are they about the longer term goal of the reestablishment of the Caliphate. They are discussions over whether intentionally killing civilians is moral. Or they are discussions over whether or not such tactics are practical. Others question the tactical decision by al Qaeda to turn Iraq into the central front in its war against the U.S. (2008)
Click to expand...
.....The Jawa Report?? What does you copy/pasting off some random ass websites have to do with anything? These are random other people giving their opinions with no special authority towards any information that is actually viable... meanwhile you for some reason are trying to insinuate that I don't know what is going on when I haven't even made the effort to post anything more educated than my overall opinion towards certain ideas or in direct response to someone else... So yeah... ............
 
DevilishlyKatt

DevilishlyKatt

Active Member
CrackerJax said:
Thanks for the apology. Glad you can see when you have misspoken!!

So when I am telling you what Osama has said... you want me to tell you in an original form?

Lookey here whelp.... I TOLD you in the FIRST place in my OWN words.... you called me a TROLL.

THEN....

I go FIND the QUOTES and clear INTENT that Al Queda considered IRAQ to be the CENTRAL FRONT.... which means... drum roll...I was, with my ORIGINAL THOUGHTS .... 100% CORRECT and you were 100% INCORRECT.

So I gave it to you BOTH ways.... and guess what... You are wrong BOTH times!!

You are a .... oh what's the word? oh yah.... a TROLL.

educate urself.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure what mommy is reading back to you from your monitor, but you clearly have no comprehension of what I just said. You can quote all you like, but you quoting some random means nothing. These people you are quoting have no special intel nor (hopefully) any direct communication with the Al Q. I'm now literally astonished you even have the capability to operate your pc to the extent of posting here :?:?:? Keep going if you really want I guess, you are giving me and hubby a laugh while there is not much going on at work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top