Welcome home Marc Emery

kDude

Well-Known Member
I would just prefer to have a vocal cannabis advocate that doesn't like to drug young girls.....just a personal preference. If you are willing to look the other way on that one, have at it.
post the whole thing, not just a snippet that sounds bad man
kinda misleading.

"Drugs that are good for women to enjoy & heighten the sex act:

#1 2C-B. This will,make her an incredible sucking, vibrating, bouncing, pleasure seeking fiend for 4 – 5 hours straight. Absolutely 100% goddamn right. ITs a single-ring amphetamine molecule related to MDMA, its a phenylathelamine, but goes right to a woman’s ‘F**K CENTRAL CORTEX’. Its awe inspriring. We should put it in their food. Daily.

#2 Alcohol. Except for 2C-B, this is still the working class reliable for lubricating a woman’s desire, libido and willingness.

#3 Hashish. Good hashish makes women more able to have orgasm, more of them and more exciting ones.

#4 Cocaine. If you want to f**k her ass, this is ‘deriguer’ (fancy french meaning the girl has GOT to have it)"

i dunno, i don't read that as a rapist how-to.. looks more jestful than anything, but i don't know the tone used.

same with the nazi jew.. he doesn't call "people who challenge him that".. he called one jew who persecuted him that.. i wont reiterate but here's his explanation about that quote;
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/002553.html
i think it's actually from someone quite negative on him, but shows his intention.


don't get me wrong, i'm not a huge Emery fan.. he does good and bad for the movement, and seems a little egotistical IMO.. but i hate seeing false reporting of facts..
go ahead and post bad crap he said.. i'm sure there's a lot (we all say dumb shit sometimes) but don't take part of it so it seem worse.. that's not cool.
no offense meant, i just don't like seeing mistruths spread.. on anything, not just Marc.
 

Jackal69

Well-Known Member
like how it says women (not young girls) people sometimes add their own interpretation to things.... if there was a criminal act wouldn't the govt ensure that was pursued to the fullest extent of the law as they seem to hate him?

Funny thing about the interview Marc seems to say something and Justin denies it, isn't that a good start..... now ya have to decide who is telling the truth..... a EX-Con or a Politian

well he is an ex-con LOL
 

reasonevangelist

Well-Known Member
like how it says women (not young girls) people sometimes add their own interpretation to things.... if there was a criminal act wouldn't the govt ensure that was pursued to the fullest extent of the law as they seem to hate him?

Funny thing about the interview Marc seems to say something and Justin denies it, isn't that a good start..... now ya have to decide who is telling the truth..... a EX-Con or a Politian

well he is an ex-con LOL
Just like i said in the "conspiracy theories cause harm" thread: the ex-con is held to a much higher standard of truth, than ANY politician. Any cognitively sufficient individual knows to expect politicians to lie a majority of the time.
 

CannaReview

Well-Known Member
He merely made reference to the fact that nothing would have changed if she hadn't stood up to the unjust aithoritarians. Next you'll be calling him an abortionist because he referred to morgentaller as another who stood up to government. The point he was trying to make IMO is that he is being open and in your face about he thinks should be happening and why, and that is how he intends on creating change.
Sorry but I don't consider being able to smoke weed vs fighting to be considered a human being with rights and not some low level human class as the same level of civil disobedience.
 

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
That is not the correlation. It is the point of standing up for something you believe in and affecting change. The two two issues are only similar in the expected outcome...change.
 

Jackal69

Well-Known Member
actually didn't more happen in progress since he was in jail (which should have been a Canadian one if he got time for it from a Canadian judge)

Change can be for better or worse, more often worse as history has proven time and time again. Never seems to change for the better for the working stiff/lower income even the so called middle class, but if the rich want it well you know that story!

Get rid of money get rid of 95% of the world issues
 

CannaReview

Well-Known Member
That is not the correlation. It is the point of standing up for something you believe in and affecting change. The two two issues are only similar in the expected outcome...change.
If he wanted to make a change in the US he would have set up shop there and sold seeds there but he thought sitting behind the border he would have been untouchable while cashing in on seed sales. I`m sure Rosa and Ghandi were thinking of cashing in too lol.

So if I start my civil disobedience by smoking cigarettes in public places where its banned or drinking alcohol I can go on the news and refer to Rosa... After all I'm trying to stand up for people to have a right to do as they wish with their bodies.
 

Jackal69

Well-Known Member
or could have thought that his Country would protect his rights as a Canadian citizen by not being thrown to the wolves.
I wouldn't have sent anything across the border myself .... but hey he was poking the bear and it bit him on the ass
 

CannaReview

Well-Known Member
or could have thought that his Country would protect his rights as a Canadian citizen by not being thrown to the wolves.
I wouldn't have sent anything across the border myself .... but hey he was poking the bear and it bit him on the ass
While making money from the seed sales. Well I'm not saying Canada should have extradited him but seeds are not legal in Canada and are in a gray area. If Seeds were legal and he was extradited for that then I'd have a big issue with it.
 

Jackal69

Well-Known Member
While making money from the seed sales. Well I'm not saying Canada should have extradited him but seeds are not legal in Canada and are in a gray area. If Seeds were legal and he was extradited for that then I'd have a big issue with it.
gotta eat and sleep dude.
 

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
I really think you're twisting the reference to rosa and ghandi. He openly ran a marijuana seed business that paid FEDERAL TAXES for many years with out a boo from the powers that be. He didn't just pocket all the money, if he is to be believed, he diverted it to organizations/groups that supported the end to prohibition. Just like LP's "everyone's gotta make a livin'" right?
 

CannaReview

Well-Known Member
I really think you're twisting the reference to rosa and ghandi. He openly ran a marijuana seed business that paid FEDERAL TAXES for many years with out a boo from the powers that be. He didn't just pocket all the money, if he is to be believed, he diverted it to organizations/groups that supported the end to prohibition. Just like LP's "everyone's gotta make a livin'" right?
Sure he was more than safe selling seeds to Canadians and other countries that don't go around the world creating wars in the name or bringing them democracy. So what was wrong with trying to over turn Canadian cannabis laws first and foremost? What Canadian sales didn't support him enough to make big enough profits so the US looked like a good cash cow?
 

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
And who forced all those fucking Americans into buying those seeds? He should not have been held responsible and accountable for the actions of people in another country. Again, he paid taxes ffs. How much more documentation of being out in the open do you need? He was fed to the US for political reasons only otherwise he would have been convicted in a Canadian court. But he wasn't.
 

CannaReview

Well-Known Member
And who forced all those fucking Americans into buying those seeds? He should not have been held responsible and accountable for the actions of people in another country. Again, he paid taxes ffs. How much more documentation of being out in the open do you need? He was fed to the US for political reasons only otherwise he would have been convicted in a Canadian court. But he wasn't.
Hey he's the one who sold and sent seeds to the US no one but himself made that decision and at the end of the day he thought he would but an egg on the US face while making money. He sure showed them.
 

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
We obviously agree to disagree. I think he's an arrogant prick with a bit of a god complex but I would trust and vote for him before Harptler. Emery's agenda is apparently not hidden.
 

CannaReview

Well-Known Member
We obviously agree to disagree. I think he's an arrogant prick with a bit of a god complex but I would trust and vote for him before Harptler. Emery's agenda is apparently not hidden.

I wouldn't vote for any of them, one thinks too much about making profits while the other one wants to sell off Canada so his friends can make profits. Nothing will change if politicians are not more accountable for their actions.
 

The Hippy

Well-Known Member
IMO everyone who had any hand in putting him in jail should be in jail themselves. Because going to jail for selling seeds is an insane punishment. He's not the criminal...those who put him there are. But the booze wagon rolls along unchecked driven by hypocrite drunkards !
 

reasonevangelist

Well-Known Member
Guess what happens if the people who "get it," don't vote out the worst, and vote in the least-bad, of the available candidates.

The people who "don't get it," vote in accordance with the most appealing propaganda.
 
Top