Utah Woman Charged With Lewdness After Being Topless In Her Own Home

Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
f series said:
Do you show off your wife's tits to your friends?
Would you be mad if she decided she wants to show your friends her tits?
If you don't have a wife, then hypothetically.

@Fogdog you too
Click to expand...
That's not what she did. You jerks always create these fake analogies. IF you cared to know the facts before posting your stupid analogy, you'd know it too.

Buchanan, who was charged in February, talked to the Tribune in September, telling the story she says started when she and her husband stripped off their dirty clothes, down to their underwear, after putting up insulation in their garage in preparation to jump in the shower.
Her three stepkids—two boys and a girl, ages 9, 10, and 13—then came in and saw her topless. Buchanan says she decided to use the situation as a "teaching moment," per the Tribune: She said they shouldn't feel uncomfortable at seeing her chest, as their dad's didn't bother them.

www.newser.com

Woman who bared breasts in front of stepkids fights charges

"An unequal and unfair dichotomy."
www.newser.com www.newser.com

Try sticking to the facts and avoiding your moral outrage explain why the state must charge her. The only good reason for charging that woman and potentially putting her in prison for years as well as requiring her to register as a sex offender is if somebody was harmed. What harm are you claiming she did?
 
Last edited:
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
PJ Diaz said:
On California State beaches it's official policy to not take action to women being topless unless there is a specific public complaint. Even then they just ask women to put their tops on before citing them.
Click to expand...
but the children!!!!

Oh the humanity!
 
f series

f series

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
That's not what she did. You jerks always create these fake analogies. IF you cared to know the facts before posting your stupid analogy, you'd know it too.

Buchanan, who was charged in February, talked to the Tribune in September, telling the story she says started when she and her husband stripped off their dirty clothes, down to their underwear, after putting up insulation in their garage in preparation to jump in the shower.
Her three stepkids—two boys and a girl, ages 9, 10, and 13—then came in and saw her topless. Buchanan says she decided to use the situation as a "teaching moment," per the Tribune: She said they shouldn't feel uncomfortable at seeing her chest, as their dad's didn't bother them.

www.newser.com

Woman who bared breasts in front of stepkids fights charges

"An unequal and unfair dichotomy."
www.newser.com www.newser.com

Sticking to the facts and avoiding your moral outrage explain why the state must charge her. The only good reason for charging that woman and potentially putting her in prison for years as well as requiring her to register as a sex offender is if somebody was harmed. What harm are you claiming she did?
Click to expand...
I'm not even talking about her.
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
This is another of those issues I have a lot of faith in the newer generations moving our society out of. Our gender hang ups are as bad if not worse than our racial hang ups. More and more kids are interacting and competing with everyone, so it becomes less unusual for them to see women in leadership roles.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
hanimmal said:
This is another of those issues I have a lot of faith in the newer generations moving our society out of. Our gender hang ups are as bad if not worse than our racial hang ups. More and more kids are interacting and competing with everyone, so it becomes less unusual for them to see women in leadership roles.
Click to expand...
Utah is about 50 years behind the coast states but that still doesn't justify their actions.

The charge includes jail time and for the rest of her life being a registered sex offender and all the baggage that includes. I don't care what era we live in, the state must provide good reason for depriving somebody of their freedom to justify such harsh treatment.

Who was harmed?
 
f series

f series

Well-Known Member
f series said:
There's nothing you could do other than leave her or deal. I just wanna see how many of you are voluntary cucks
Click to expand...

Budley Doright said:
That a boy, keep that bitch under control! Do you hit her when she talks back as well. Can’t have that women getting all uppity in front of your friends, good for you. Hopefully your boys (if you don’t have any then hypothetically) are keeping this pattern going so the women in your family stay obedient ............
Click to expand...
No dealing in this case would be "leave her"
Sorry to disappoint, boys!
 
Budley Doright

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
f series said:
No dealing in this case would be "leave her"
Sorry to disappoint, boys!
Click to expand...
Well ok, at least your man enough to do that, that’ll teach her. Don’t go back even if she shows remorse and shame. That would be a sign of weakness. Hope you would kick her out and not the opposite?
 
f series

f series

Well-Known Member
Budley Doright said:
Well ok, at least your man enough to do that, that’ll teach her. Don’t go back even if she shows remorse and shame. That would be a sign of weakness. Hope you would kick her out and not the opposite?
Click to expand...
In this hypothetical situation I was under the impression we were both very well off. So I'd probably leave the house as I left her.

What other cases?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top