Harrekin
Well-Known Member
A theory doesn't reach conclusions, conclusions EVENTUALLY reach theory.
You're out of you're element, Donny.
US college professor demands imprisonment for climate-change deniers
- Thread starter squarepush3r
- Start date
- Status
You're out of you're element, Donny.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Now they are redoing the old FDA food triangle.
Foods that fight global warning are there.
The DOD is spending millions on this. Govts are being shaken down for $$ in the 3rd world while actual science is rejected.
Green is TAX. It is ONLY TAX.
All the skeptics are skeptical of you trying to say anyone is admitting anything.
Doer clear?
Foods that fight global warning are there.
The DOD is spending millions on this. Govts are being shaken down for $$ in the 3rd world while actual science is rejected.
Green is TAX. It is ONLY TAX.
Big clue, Buck. You are not making any sense.(like, I should talk, right?) I This is not even rhetoric. It is more Sophistry in a badly formed passive aggression attempt.. I have seen much better.
All the skeptics are skeptical of you trying to say anyone is admitting anything.
Doer clear?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
actually, 3rd world nations that are leading the way in renewable energies and low carbon footprints are getting millions and billions from investors and other governments to fund their efforts.
so you have it completely backwards, like usual.
stop believing everything the heartland institute tells you to believe. tobacco smoke is indeed harmful, despite what they are paid to say.
Beefbisquit
Well-Known Member
A theory is a group of facts and observations combined to make something with explanatory power.
Doer
Well-Known Member
I really think you shoot your foot, not the messenger. But you are getting my message, finally. I have no idea who all these opposition are. I don't align with any 'tute. Nor will I lie down beside them.
I know I can see everything backwards. I just didn't think you would be telling everyone. Fine. But, if that is a forum lie, it really went over my head.
You are not saying you have some kind of de-code on Dark Mind Influence, are you?
I mean you may as well....just don't....please please, don't throw...not the brier patch!!!!!
Doer
Well-Known Member
That is a theory in Philosophy. Something with explanatory power? ...yeah words failed you. aah something something
That is not the science definition. Science is much less touchy-feely.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Buck, point taken about the 3rd world leap frog in tech...maybe...eventually....maybe not.
But, what you are saying (and we are honest together) this confusion of the political, debate is slowing the uptake of the oil economies, purposefully, in order to preserve the market for these "emerging technologies,"
But, there is no emerging tech you can name.
Am I right?
But, what you are saying (and we are honest together) this confusion of the political, debate is slowing the uptake of the oil economies, purposefully, in order to preserve the market for these "emerging technologies,"
But, there is no emerging tech you can name.
Am I right?
heckler73
Well-Known Member
Chi-squared values.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
are you serious, or setting me up for some type of doering?But, there is no emerging tech you can name.
Am I right?
Doer
Well-Known Member
Just keep your eye on the pea, not the cups.
Beefbisquit
Well-Known Member
LOL.... the point of a theory is to explain and predict. My words were chosen specifically, it's you who have failed to grasp them.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Let me give you a hint.
Scientific theory = Absolutely undefeatable fact.
Scientific Theory =/= theory (Eng), its actually a shame they even use the same word.
heckler73
Well-Known Member
The woman in the TYT vid said at 5:47 "There is a very specific physics calculation you can do, on how much CO2 you put in the atmosphere and how much warming you'll get"...
REALLY?
There's also an exact equation--accurate to the order of 10^(anal retentive)--of what happens to a spherical cow when it jumps over a square moon made of green mozzarella (in a vacuum, of course). Show me this "very specific physics calculation" for CO2, please. 
I hope it's not the one used by the CMIP5 "prognosticators".
(Yah, that pic came from Spencer. SHILL! BIG OIL! GOONYGOOGOO SOMETHINGSOMETHING! )
I want those data-sets...
REALLY?
There's also an exact equation--accurate to the order of 10^(anal retentive)--of what happens to a spherical cow when it jumps over a square moon made of green mozzarella (in a vacuum, of course). Show me this "very specific physics calculation" for CO2, please. I hope it's not the one used by the CMIP5 "prognosticators".
(Yah, that pic came from Spencer. SHILL! BIG OIL! GOONYGOOGOO SOMETHINGSOMETHING! )
I want those data-sets...
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
But...but...our funding?!?!The woman in the TYT vid said at 5:47 "There is a very specific physics calculation you can do, on how much CO2 you put in the atmosphere and how much warming you'll get"...
REALLY?
I hope it's not the one used by the CMIP5 "prognosticators".
(Yah, that pic came from Spencer. SHILL! BIG OIL! GOONYGOOGOO SOMETHINGSOMETHING! )
I want those data-sets...
heckler73
Well-Known Member
That's cool. But I am interested in chi-squared values. Whether or not Spencer shoots-up junk into his junk doesn't change it.
Unless his testicles somehow control the universe.
I don't think they do.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
just as i would not rely on jared taylor and american renaissance to make conclusions about race and crime, i would not trust an evangelical creationist to make any scientific conclusion whatsoever.
- Status