U.S. right wing extremists more deadly than jihadists

Dr Kynes said:
meaningless copy/paste from some unknown asshole's OPINION about what was in the ron paul newsletters, and his OPINION that since ron paul didnt answer a charge that was never leveled, he must therefore be guilty.

wikiwisdom doesnt impress, nor does it educate. wikipedia is crowdsourced opinion, and in case you didnt know, the crowd is a bunch of idiots.
Click to expand...

There are these things called citations which can be checked in the footnotes. The Wikipedia article is supported with citations. I'm sorry that your hero is a racist.

The article is not opinion because it is supported by facts.
 
MidwesternGro said:
There are these things called citations which can be checked in the footnotes. The Wikipedia article is supported with citations. I'm sorry that your hero is a racist.

The article is not opinion because it is supported by facts.
Click to expand...
and you didnt pursue a single one of those footnotes.

they all came from secondary sources like newspaper op-eds, tertiary sources like tv news broadcasts repeating newspaper op-eds, and feculent sources like the huffington post.

the best way to demonstrate that ron paul is a racist is to offer up actual quotes from ron paul, which are racist.


but that would be too much like real work.

it's so much easier to simply repeat calumny from shabby sources.
 
"Another newsletter suggested that black activists who wanted to rename New York City after Martin Luther King Jr. rename it "Welfaria," "Zooville," "Rapetown," "Dirtburg," or "Lazyopolis.""

You don't think that that is racist? How about this:
ronpaulcf.jpg

Is Ron Paul standing in front of a confederate flag after publishing newsletters that say vile, racist things enough proof for you that he is a racist piece of shit?


Dr Kynes said:
and you didnt pursue a single one of those footnotes.

they all came from secondary sources like newspaper op-eds, tertiary sources like tv news broadcasts repeating newspaper op-eds, and feculent sources like the huffington post.

the best way to demonstrate that ron paul is a racist is to offer up actual quotes from ron paul, which are racist.


but that would be too much like real work.

it's so much easier to simply repeat calumny from shabby sources.
Click to expand...
 
So what if he is a racist. It's not as if he's the only one. The world is full of them.

People need to stop whining about stuff they really don't care about. If something really matters to a person they do something about it. Crying on the internet never really solves anything. Some of the arguments here really are ridiculous.
 
Dr Kynes said:
and you didnt pursue a single one of those footnotes.

they all came from secondary sources like newspaper op-eds, tertiary sources like tv news broadcasts repeating newspaper op-eds, and feculent sources like the huffington post.

the best way to demonstrate that ron paul is a racist is to offer up actual quotes from ron paul, which are racist.


but that would be too much like real work.

it's so much easier to simply repeat calumny from shabby sources.
Click to expand...

there are some actual quotes from rawn pawl in the houston chronicle, may 23rd 1996, section A, page 29. this was cited in a footnote in the wikipedia article.

if you want something better than those printed, actual quotes from 1996, i can show you rawn pawl himself owning up to that defense in 2011.

in a post debate interview with hannity, he referred to an article written in the texas monthly in 2011.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2824529/posts

here is that interview he did with texas monthly:

http://www.texasmonthly.com/content/dr-no

he talks about what happened when he owned up to those newsletters in 1996. he says he lied then. but now, he has a new lie and says he never knew about them. but that contradicts his earlier lie(s).

i can also show you the interviews his aides have done, all of whom say that rawn pawl either wrote or approved each of those newsletters personally.

whether he actually wrote them or not, he KNOWINGLY made millions off of said stoking of racial tensions.

go ahead and ask me to post the youtube post debate interview he did with hannity. i can find it.
 
sheskunk said:
So what if he is a racist...People need to stop whining...Crying on the internet never really solves anything. Some of the arguments here really are ridiculous.
Click to expand...

so why are you crying and whining on the internet about SO WHAT! if rawn pawl is a racist piece of shit?

how is your whiny, crying argument any different from those you bemoan?

is defending racists like rawn pawl something you really care about? do you often defend racists? will defending this racist solve anything?

you tell me.
 
UncleBuck said:
so why are you crying and whining on the internet about SO WHAT! if rawn pawl is a racist piece of shit?

how is your whiny, crying argument any different from those you bemoan?

is defending racists like rawn pawl something you really care about? do you often defend racists? will defending this racist solve anything?

you tell me.
Click to expand...

I defended no one.

I am amused by the drama.

The majority of the whining I see comes from you. You provide me with hours of entertainment.

You took the bait without even nibbling first. Good little fishy. ;)
 
UncleBuck said:
so why are you crying and whining on the internet about SO WHAT! if rawn pawl is a racist piece of shit?

how is your whiny, crying argument any different from those you bemoan?

is defending racists like rawn pawl something you really care about? do you often defend racists? will defending this racist solve anything?

you tell me.
Click to expand...


Whaaaa, Ron Paul is a racist.

Whaaaa, Blacks get discriminated against.

Whaaaa, People are mean to gays.

Whaaaa, White supremacists.

Whaaaa, Global Warming.

And on and on and on.

 
there are some actual quotes from rawn pawl in the houston chronicle, may 23rd 1996, section A, page 29. this was cited in a footnote in the wikipedia article.

Those are posts from nearly 20 years ago.
Who cares?
People change.
 
MidwesternGro said:
"Another newsletter suggested that black activists who wanted to rename New York City after Martin Luther King Jr. rename it "Welfaria," "Zooville," "Rapetown," "Dirtburg," or "Lazyopolis.""

You don't think that that is racist? How about this:
View attachment 3134495

Is Ron Paul standing in front of a confederate flag after publishing newsletters that say vile, racist things enough proof for you that he is a racist piece of shit?
Click to expand...
nope. see your "quote" is not from ron paul, it's from some unknown asshole saying his OPINION of what ron paul said.

you really dont have a very good handle on what a quote is, or what facts are.

demonstrate ron paul actually saying racist shit, somebody else saying ron paul said racist shit is useless.

further, the confederate flag is not proof of racism, its proof of southern sensibilities

here's Barry O standing in front of an israeli flag:

111202_obama_israel_ap_328.jpg


does this prove Barry is jewish?
 
I never liked Ron Paul very much. Too bad all of this stuff is probably mostly made up. If it were all true, he'd be a great American.
 
Dr Kynes said:
the confederate flag is not proof of racism, its proof of southern sensibilities
Click to expand...

see above posts for actual declarations of causes for secession. slavery pretty much tops the charts.

that flag was declared in the name of "maintaining and protecting the institution known as negro slavery-- the servitude of the African to the white race... which her people intended should exist in all future time."

southern sensibility, or racism?

you tell me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top