UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
how dare a candidate influence an election
Trump signs resolution killing rule intended to prevent racial bias in auto lending
- Thread starter SB85
- Start date
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Brazile: I found no evidence Democratic primary was rigged
https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/05/politics/donna-brazile-primary-rigged/index.html
Bernie didn't win the Black, Hispanic and Women's vote in any meaningful majority. The only group that Bernie polled well with was white men. Your theory doesn't account for the fact of an unequal response to him. Theories should at least fit the facts, don't you think?
Here's mine. Not just mine but the one that makes more sense. Bernie lost because he couldn't win the Black, Hispanic and Women's vote in any meaningful majority. He's repeating his past mistakes too.
tangerinegreen555
Well-Known Member
goddamn, all you did was cry in that post.
Nothing unusual.
Waaaaah, Bernie got cheated. By 16 fucking percent in my state. And nobody twisted my arm one way or the other.
But did you watch the video?
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
White men weren't affected by Clinton's shenanigans. Only Black, Hispanic and women voters were affected.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
I stated facts you can't address because they expose your hypocrisy. You care when the election is influenced against you when Trump does it, but you support Clinton influencing the election against Sanders. So it's clear, given the evidence, that it's not the subversion of democracy that bothers you, it's the subversion of democracy when it affects the candidate you support that bothers you.
It sucks when one candidate unfairly influences the outcome of the election against you, doesn't it?
You bought it
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Wherein she voiced complaints about not being funded or listened to in the manner she thought appropriate. She said there was no evidence that Clinton took unfair advantage of Bernie.
Your theory doesn't make sense.
tangerinegreen555
Well-Known Member
Foreign interference from an adversarial gov't. trying to influence an American election vs. party politics.
Duct tape mentality.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
You just made me hungry for a Publix sub. In Florida, every race and gender was represented at the deli counter. FYI
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
`What the Clinton campaign and Democratic establishment did during the 2016 season to screw progressives was not "party politics", call it what it was; cheating.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
These so called Progressives are self-screwing.
srh88
Well-Known Member
publix subs are something I definitely miss about FL. I was never discriminated at the counter though
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Probably because you behaved like something other than an entitled asshole.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
nope
srh88
Well-Known Member
Id say if anyone cheaed the Dems it was barnie. Split the party and filled young people's heads full of fairy tales. Barnie will not get my vote this next election
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Bernie benefited from using DNC infrastructure and didn't pay for it. In order to gain access to the valuable DNC databases, he agreed to conduct joint fundraising events with the DNC. He never did.
Bernie leeched off the DNC then left it with lyme disease.
tangerinegreen555
Well-Known Member
SB85
Well-Known Member
I feel Bernie along with others should create their own platform. There is no need for him to be a democrat come election year and then be 100% progressive once the season is over. Bernie could have ran Independent but instead he told his backers to support Clinton after he lost. Why aren't Bernie supporters upset with the guy for telling them to back someone/ a party they don't fully agree with?
Last edited:
tangerinegreen555
Well-Known Member
Democrats are the progressives, have been the 45 years I've been voting.
You're in an ultra left lunatic fringe without anywhere near enough support to get anything but a whining party.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Alex Jones redux. Former astrologer, Caitlin Jones.
Is it funny or sad that they can treat the above as a credible news source while accusing others of living in an echo chamber?
Both I suppose.
Similar threads
