TRUMP CONVICTED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Judge denies Trump’s mistrial motion in NY fraud case
A New York judge has denied former President Trump’s motion for a mistrial in his civil fraud case, rejecting the claim that the judge and his principal law clerk had “tainted” the trial with bias.

Judge Arthur Engoron issued a scathing rebuke of Trump’s mistrial motion Friday afternoon, describing it as “utterly without merit.”

He defended the political donations of his clerk and his own extrajudicial posts online to a school alumni website that came under fire by the former president’s defense.

“I stand by each and every ruling, and they speak for themselves,” Engoron wrote in the six-page decision.

The judge accused Trump’s counsel of cherry-picking purported evidence of misconduct without showing the full picture. The mistrial motion cited a comment made by Engoron during Trump’s testimony that the judge was “not here to hear what [Donald Trump] has to say,” but excluded his next sentence which contextualized the comment.

“Such argument is disingenuous and made in bad faith, as defendants omitted what I said immediately after that sentence, which is ‘I’m here to hear him answer questions,'” Engoron wrote. “Indeed, those are precisely the roles of the witness and the finder of fact.”

That the judge had shared links about the case on his school alumni website also drew the ire of Trump’s counsel, which Engoron objected to by asserting that “none of this has anything to do with, much less does it interfere with, my presiding fairly, impartially, and professionally over the instant dispute.”

His clerk — who has become an unwitting main character in the fraud trial — was also targeted in the mistrial motion, which suggested that she has been given “unprecedented and inappropriate latitude” to act as a “co-judge” in the case. The clerk frequently confers with Engoron via whispers and written notes, frequently before orders are issued.

“There is absolutely no ‘co-judging’ at play,” Engoron wrote.

Trump’s counsel also accused the clerk of making “partisan political contributions in excess of strict limits,” including to groups that oppose Trump and support New York Attorney General Letitia James (D).

Engoron took to his clerk’s defense in his order, again accusing Trump’s lawyers of presenting arguments lacking context. He cited a judicial ethics opinion asserting that the contribution limits do “not apply to an appointee’s contributions to his or her own campaign. Nor would there be such a monetary restriction on the purchasing of tickets to political functions.”

The New York judge also took aim at Trump’s counsel for attempting to conflate his clerk’s attendance at “legally and ethically permitted” political events with his own political standing.

“Such arguments are nonsensical; and, in any event, they are a red herring, as my Principal Law Clerk does not make rulings or issue orders – I do,” Engoron wrote.
Looks like he won't be disqualified even from the general election, if the Colorado ruling stands. The US constitution is a suicide pact, Trump committed insurrection, but the 14th doesn't apply to the president, buckle up.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Trump commends Johnson for ‘having the courage’ to release Jan 6 tapes publicly
Former President Trump praised Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Friday, after Republicans began to release footage from the Jan. 6, 2021, riot on the Capitol.

The tapes, shared by the Committee on House Administration, show the Capitol premises during the insurrection. So far, roughly 90 hours of the 44,000 hours of footage have been made public, but the full collection is expected to be released by Monday.

“Congratulations to Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson for having the Courage and Fortitude to release all of the J6 Tapes, which will explicitly reveal what really happened on January 6th!” Trump wrote in a Friday Truth Social post.

The House committee that released the tapes initially announced its intent to do so in September.

“This decision will provide millions of Americans, criminal defendants, public interest organizations, and the media an ability to see for themselves what happened that day, rather than having to rely upon the interpretation of a small group of government officials,” Johnson said in his announcement.

Faces of private citizens were blurred and about 5 percent of the footage will be redacted for building security concerns, the Speaker added.

The tapes come nearly three years after the riot. Several Republican lawmakers have pushed for the footage to be made public in the years since, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) — a staunch ally of the former president.

“We need to release the J6 tapes to a public on line source so that everyone knows what did and didn’t happen, we need to restore fair justice, and America can move on,” Greene said earlier this year.

The news also comes after former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) made headlines in February when he granted access to some of the tapes to then-Fox News host Tucker Carlson, after prompting speculation about how and when he would release the footage.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Trump claims judge in fraud trial is ‘complete and total puppet’ of New York AG
Former President Trump claimed Saturday that the judge in his New York civil fraud trial is a “complete and total puppet” of New York Attorney General Letitia James.

“Judge Arthur Engoron, the most overturned and stayed Judge in the State, and the Racist New York State Attorney General, the most corrupt & incompetent A.G. in the Country (Violent Crime Is Raging!), have FRAUDULENTLY Undervalued my properties, by many times, in order to make me look bad, and make the Judge’s original ridiculous finding of Fraud pass the ‘smell test,’ which it does not,” Trump said on Truth Social.

Trump’s newest attack comes after the temporary lifting of a limited gag order by an appellate judge that prevented the former president and his attorneys from talking about Engoron’s staff. His comments also follow a denial of a motion for mistrial in the case, pushing back against a claim by Trump that the trial judge and his principal law clerk’s alleged bias against him had “tainted” the case.
“This Judicial and Prosecutorial corruption and misconduct took place BEFORE THE TRIAL EVEN STARTED, & WITHOUT ANY KNOWLEDGE OF THE CASE,” the former president continued Saturday. “Judge Engoron just did what the highly partisan A.G. told him to do. He is her complete and total puppet!”

New York Rep. Elise Stefanik (R), a staunch Trump supporter, added onto her original ethics complaint against Engoron on Friday, claiming the judge “wrongfully denied” Trump’s mistrial motion.

Following the gag order lift, Trump immediately took to Truth Social to blast Engoron and his law clerk.
“Judge Arthur Engoron has just been overturned (stayed!) by the New York State Appellate Division (Appeals Court), for the 4th TIME (on the same case!),” Trump posted Thursday.

“His Ridiculous and Unconstitutional Gag Order, not allowing me to defend myself against him and his politically biased and out of control, Trump Hating Clerk, who is sinking him and his Court to new levels of LOW, is a disgrace,” he added.

Despite the pushback, Engoron has already ruled the former president and his business are liable for fraud. James, in her case, alleged that the Trump Organization sought lower taxes and better insurance coverage by falsely inflating and deflating the value of its assets.
The attorney general’s office is seeking some $250 million in financial penalties and to bar Trump — and his adult children — from operating businesses in New York.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

Ty Cobb predicts Trump would defy gag order and go to jail

Former Trump White House lawyer Ty Cobb tells CNN’s Erin Burnett he thinks former President Donald Trump will spend time in jail for violating a limited gag order if it is restored by a federal appeals court.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Judge declines to revoke bond of Trump Georgia co-defendant
A Georgia judge declined to revoke the bond of one of former President Trump’s co-defendants in his 2020 election subversion case Tuesday, allowing him to remain free on bond ahead of a future trial.

Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee determined Tuesday that the bond agreement for Harrison Floyd, a former leader of Black Voices for Trump, must be updated to reflect the “nuances of social media.” However, McAfee said he believed that Floyd did make a “technical violation” of his bond.

“I think the ultimate result of today’s hearing is that it’s very clear to me that this bond needs to be modified,” McAfee said.

McAfee approved a more detailed bond agreement provided by the state at the end of the hearing, though he said he would be open to modifying it again in the future after prosecutors and Floyd’s counsel have had more time to examine its specifics.

Floyd was the first defendant threatened with pretrial detention over social media posts that prosecutors say demonstrate attempts at intimidating future witnesses and communicating “directly and indirectly” with co-defendants in the case.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis (D) herself argued the state’s case to put Floyd in jail before trial, the first time she has done so in any hearing since handing up charges against Trump and 18 others.

Her appearance Tuesday underscored what already appeared to be a particularly contentious relationship between Willis and Floyd.

In August, Floyd was the only defendant to surrender without negotiating a bond agreement in advance. He was detained for multiple days, and blamed it on Willis.

In recent days, prosecutors seemed to insinuate that Floyd’s team leaked proffer videos of co-defendants who pleaded guilty being interviewed by prosecutors. Another defendant’s lawyer later admitted to leaking the videos.

Willis’s attempt to revoke Floyd’s bond was filed hours later, alleging his social media posts violated his conditions of release.

“What we’re really here to decide today is, does this order mean something or not,” Willis said, asserting that Floyd “spit on the court” by posting about witnesses and co-defendants online.

Floyd’s attorneys claimed state prosecutors were seeking to silence Floyd’s lawful political speech. The Trump co-defendant was present at Tuesday’s hearing, donning a kelly green suit jacket.

“None of these posts amounted to a threat or intimidation,” said Chris Kachouroff, one of Floyd’s attorneys.

His lawyers also argued that tagging people involved in the case on social media was Floyd’s way of “referring” to them, not “communicating” with them. Willis emphasized the clause in Floyd’s pretrial release agreement prohibiting him from “indirectly” communicating with co-defendants or future witnesses, suggesting that tagging witnesses on social media qualifies as such behavior.

Known state witnesses — including Fulton County poll worker Ruby Freeman, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, and Gabe Sterling, chief operating officer of the Secretary of State’s office — were mentioned numerous times on Floyd’s account on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

“Look, the truth is that @GaSecofState & @GabrielSterling are the pieces of [shit] you should be mad at,” Floyd tweeted Nov. 7, using a poop emoji to replace the expletive.

Sterling briefly testified Tuesday afternoon as a state witness, and Willis asked him whether he enjoys being called “a piece of fecal matter.”

“No, ma’am,” Sterling replied.

Willis also presented a text message from Jenna Ellis — a co-defendant in the case who recently pleaded guilty to lesser charges as part of a plea agreement with the state — where Ellis said Floyd’s posts about her were meant to “both intimidate and harass me and also encourage others to harass me.”

Michael Hill, an investigator in Willis’s office who has worked on the case, and Von DuBose, an attorney representing Freeman, also testified during the hearing.

Floyd’s charges stem from his alleged efforts to convince Freeman to make false statements about 2020 election operations, under the guise of offering her help. He has pleaded not guilty.

In Willis’s motion to revoke Floyd’s bond, she said the Trump co-defendant’s “intimidating communications” have caused Freeman to be subject to “renewed threats of violence” from third parties.

DuBose testified that Freeman and her daughter — Shaye Moss, another Fulton County poll worker — employ a third-party vendor to monitor potential threats against them online. A spike in online activity followed Floyd’s posts about Freeman, causing her counsel to take “precautions” to protect her, because spikes are usually followed by threats, DuBose said.

“There are real consequences for allowing defendants to intimidate witnesses,” Willis told the judge.

Floyd, who was generally posting on X multiple times per day, continued to do so immediately after prosecutors filed their motion to revoke Floyd’s bond last Wednesday, but he has not posted since Friday.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Judge declines to revoke bond of Trump Georgia co-defendant
A Georgia judge declined to revoke the bond of one of former President Trump’s co-defendants in his 2020 election subversion case Tuesday, allowing him to remain free on bond ahead of a future trial.

Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee determined Tuesday that the bond agreement for Harrison Floyd, a former leader of Black Voices for Trump, must be updated to reflect the “nuances of social media.” However, McAfee said he believed that Floyd did make a “technical violation” of his bond.

“I think the ultimate result of today’s hearing is that it’s very clear to me that this bond needs to be modified,” McAfee said.

McAfee approved a more detailed bond agreement provided by the state at the end of the hearing, though he said he would be open to modifying it again in the future after prosecutors and Floyd’s counsel have had more time to examine its specifics.

Floyd was the first defendant threatened with pretrial detention over social media posts that prosecutors say demonstrate attempts at intimidating future witnesses and communicating “directly and indirectly” with co-defendants in the case.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis (D) herself argued the state’s case to put Floyd in jail before trial, the first time she has done so in any hearing since handing up charges against Trump and 18 others.

Her appearance Tuesday underscored what already appeared to be a particularly contentious relationship between Willis and Floyd.

In August, Floyd was the only defendant to surrender without negotiating a bond agreement in advance. He was detained for multiple days, and blamed it on Willis.

In recent days, prosecutors seemed to insinuate that Floyd’s team leaked proffer videos of co-defendants who pleaded guilty being interviewed by prosecutors. Another defendant’s lawyer later admitted to leaking the videos.

Willis’s attempt to revoke Floyd’s bond was filed hours later, alleging his social media posts violated his conditions of release.

“What we’re really here to decide today is, does this order mean something or not,” Willis said, asserting that Floyd “spit on the court” by posting about witnesses and co-defendants online.

Floyd’s attorneys claimed state prosecutors were seeking to silence Floyd’s lawful political speech. The Trump co-defendant was present at Tuesday’s hearing, donning a kelly green suit jacket.

“None of these posts amounted to a threat or intimidation,” said Chris Kachouroff, one of Floyd’s attorneys.

His lawyers also argued that tagging people involved in the case on social media was Floyd’s way of “referring” to them, not “communicating” with them. Willis emphasized the clause in Floyd’s pretrial release agreement prohibiting him from “indirectly” communicating with co-defendants or future witnesses, suggesting that tagging witnesses on social media qualifies as such behavior.

Known state witnesses — including Fulton County poll worker Ruby Freeman, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, and Gabe Sterling, chief operating officer of the Secretary of State’s office — were mentioned numerous times on Floyd’s account on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

“Look, the truth is that @GaSecofState & @GabrielSterling are the pieces of [shit] you should be mad at,” Floyd tweeted Nov. 7, using a poop emoji to replace the expletive.

Sterling briefly testified Tuesday afternoon as a state witness, and Willis asked him whether he enjoys being called “a piece of fecal matter.”

“No, ma’am,” Sterling replied.

Willis also presented a text message from Jenna Ellis — a co-defendant in the case who recently pleaded guilty to lesser charges as part of a plea agreement with the state — where Ellis said Floyd’s posts about her were meant to “both intimidate and harass me and also encourage others to harass me.”

Michael Hill, an investigator in Willis’s office who has worked on the case, and Von DuBose, an attorney representing Freeman, also testified during the hearing.

Floyd’s charges stem from his alleged efforts to convince Freeman to make false statements about 2020 election operations, under the guise of offering her help. He has pleaded not guilty.

In Willis’s motion to revoke Floyd’s bond, she said the Trump co-defendant’s “intimidating communications” have caused Freeman to be subject to “renewed threats of violence” from third parties.

DuBose testified that Freeman and her daughter — Shaye Moss, another Fulton County poll worker — employ a third-party vendor to monitor potential threats against them online. A spike in online activity followed Floyd’s posts about Freeman, causing her counsel to take “precautions” to protect her, because spikes are usually followed by threats, DuBose said.

“There are real consequences for allowing defendants to intimidate witnesses,” Willis told the judge.

Floyd, who was generally posting on X multiple times per day, continued to do so immediately after prosecutors filed their motion to revoke Floyd’s bond last Wednesday, but he has not posted since Friday.
Because he would have to do the same with Trump when he fucked up and he will. If Trump isn't above the law, then it doesn't apply to him the same way it does to everybody else. The legal system and courts failed with Trump for most of his life, the law wasn't looking and didn't want to know when guys like him broke it. Trump represents a failure of the legal and justice system over decades and on many levels, he was a lifelong criminal.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
This is a good read.

He's screwed, the only remaining question is for how much and pundits are saying $250 million is the baseline figure it could end up well over a half a billion. One can hope they will take the fucker to the cleaners, unlike his many lawsuits where plaintiffs almost never collect, the government has control of everything and will sell everything then give him any leftovers, if any. I expect an extensive report and balance sheet from the receiver and that the judge will make it public. From what I can gather this should be over by Christmas except for the inevitable appeals, but the company and the money will be gone, and everything exposed. Also, you don't do this shit without committing crimes, lots of them and once the civil case is done the NY criminal indictments will come.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

Parallel hearings expose Trump's special treatment by the courts

Alex Wagner looks at the contrast in how Donald Trump's co-defendant Harrison Floyd was treated by one court with how Donald Trump was treated by another over similar issues. Neal Katyal, former acting U.S. solicitor general joins to discuss the leeway courts are giving to Trump in terms of time and behavior.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Good luck with Chutkan on that shit, it will work with Cannon she would fuck over American national security for Trump, Chutkan will dispose of it quickly. These people are unfit to receive national security information and it would be very useful for America's enemies, fuck him. Criminal defendants have tried every trick in the book before Donald arrived and judges have dealt with it before. The fucker is gonna die in a cage and be put in one before the GOP convention.


Trump ATTEMPT to BLACKMAIL Government EXPOSED in New Federal Filing

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas exposes Donald Trump’s tactics to engage in a form of blackmailing against the United States, called “graymail,” though the legal procedures in his federal criminal case. Meiselas goes through a letter sent by Trump’s lawyer revealing his strategy.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
She can't help him and will end up being destroyed by this, if she isn't removed, she will eventually have to sentence Trump to life in prison when he appears before her as a convicted felon. The death threats will never end, when she does what she must, he will turn on her too as will the base. Donald will go down in DC this spring and summer and there is nothing she can do about it. Georgia will likely jump in and have a trial during the election and probably a conviction by inauguration day.

If the SCOTUS doesn't disqualify him, they will deserve what they will get, win or lose.


Judge Cannon faces BLOWBACK for latest rulings, She’s IN TRUMP’S POCKET

Judge Aileen Cannon has joined the Trump defense team by issuing a series of rulings on how to handle classified documents in a criminal case about classified documents that will push the Trump trial beyond the Republican Convention and the November election. Michael Popok of Legal AF breaks down a series of Judge Cannon’s recent rulings that will deny the DOJ the ability to try the case without revealing top-secret classified information or use the “silent witness” rule to introduce classified documents against Trump, before the election.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Donald faces the prospect of dozens of republicans testifying against him in DC this spring, right in the middle of the GOP primaries. Most will have worked in his administration. How will the base deal with that? How will Donald, with his muzzle on of course. He will get the witness list in February and if he tries to go to work on it, he will be in jail pretrial for witness intimidation and tampering.

His disqualification during the primaries is still up in the air and if they don't do it then, they will be in deep shit if he wins the GOP nomination and they disqualify him after the convention when he starts filing papers in the states to run. They would have a J6 riot on the steps of the SCOTUS, except the DC police and Joe would arrest the lot and put an end to it pretty quick, if it even got off the ground to begin with. If they don't disqualify him, they are finished as an institution one way or another, if he wins it will be quicker.
 
Top