DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
I wonder if the DOJ will appeal the sentences as being too light, they should go all the way to the top with these clowns.
TRUMP CONVICTED
- Thread starter jimihendrix1
- Start date
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Flip-flopping? Trump's co-defendants in GA pointing fingers, 'beginning to turn' on ex-president
54,355 views Sep 5, 2023 #msnbc #trump #georgia
Former top Justice Department official Andrew Weissmann, senior reporter for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Tamar Hallerman and Politico National Correspondent Betsy Woodruff Swan join Nicolle Wallace to discuss new reporting out of Fulton County that Donald Trump’s co-defendants are possibly turning and pointing to him as the potential ringleader in DA Fani Willis’ case.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
A republican going after Trump over the 14th with multiple lawsuits across a lot of states.
Let's talk about the 14th amendment, Trump, and a GOP candidate....
Let's talk about the 14th amendment, Trump, and a GOP candidate....
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
More & more defendants are pointing the finger at Trump, & the flipping WILL begin accelerating
3,798 views Sep 5, 2023 #TeamJustice
More and more of Donald Trump's aides, associates and underlings are beginning to point the criminal finger at Trump. As Politico reported, " Trump's co-defendants are already starting to turn against him."
In large conspiracy cases, there always comes a point in time when co-defendants being flipping against the bigger criminal fish. IN Trump's prosecutions, that time is now upon us.
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
Idk we’ll see..
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Trump supporters reveal plan to get him elected if he's removed from ballot
Some legal scholars argue Trump is constitutionally ineligible to serve as president again because he engaged in insurrection or rebellion, something he denies.
www.newsweek.com
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
This is the biggest news on the 14th yet, we will know in a bit over a month if Trump is disqualified, I'm taking bets... 
www.newsweek.com
The legal debate about whether or not former President Donald Trump should be allowed to appear on the 2024 ballot has made its way before the Supreme Court.
The court distributed John Castro v. Donald Trump to the justices for conference on Wednesday ahead of the upcoming term, which will begin on October 2. Conference is to take place on September 26 and the case is expected to be decided on or before October 9.
Castro, a tax attorney running for the Republican nomination next year, sent his petition to the Supreme Court last month, asking the justices to answer whether political candidates can challenge the eligibility of another candidate of the same party running for the same nomination "based on a political competitive injury in the form a diminution of votes."
The lawsuit is seeking to argue that Trump should not be allowed to run for the White House based on section three of the 14th Amendment, which disqualifies individuals from holding public office if they have "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against the United States. While Trump has not been charged with insurrection, Castro is pointing to Trump's role in the January 6 Capitol riot.
The former president, who has pleaded not guilty to all charges in four criminal indictments this year, blasted attempts to remove his name from his ballot using the constitutional clause on Monday, remarking that most in the legal field have already called those efforts a long shot and warned that they could prove to be tricky water to navigate.
"Almost all legal scholars have voiced opinions that the 14th Amendment has no legal basis or standing relative to the upcoming 2024 Presidential Election," Trump wrote on Truth Social.
"Like Election Interference, it is just another 'trick' being used by the Radical Left Communists, Marxists, and Fascists, to again steal an Election that their candidate, the WORST, MOST INCOMPETENT, & MOST CORRUPT President in U.S. history, is incapable of winning in a Free and Fair Election. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!"
Newsweek reached out to Trump's attorney, Jesse Binnall via email for comment.
Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani previously told Newsweek that it's unlikely for the justices to side with Castro since Trump has yet to be charged or convicted of insurrection and rebellion.
"A conviction is not required under the plain language of the Constitution, but it's telling that even those prosecuting Trump don't believe that there is enough evidence to convict him or insurrection or sedition," Rahmani said.
Supreme Court to decide whether to kick Trump off ballot
Castro v. Trump, a case challenging Trump's candidacy with the 14th Amendment, is expected to decided by the justices on or before October 9.
www.newsweek.com
The legal debate about whether or not former President Donald Trump should be allowed to appear on the 2024 ballot has made its way before the Supreme Court.
The court distributed John Castro v. Donald Trump to the justices for conference on Wednesday ahead of the upcoming term, which will begin on October 2. Conference is to take place on September 26 and the case is expected to be decided on or before October 9.
Castro, a tax attorney running for the Republican nomination next year, sent his petition to the Supreme Court last month, asking the justices to answer whether political candidates can challenge the eligibility of another candidate of the same party running for the same nomination "based on a political competitive injury in the form a diminution of votes."
The lawsuit is seeking to argue that Trump should not be allowed to run for the White House based on section three of the 14th Amendment, which disqualifies individuals from holding public office if they have "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against the United States. While Trump has not been charged with insurrection, Castro is pointing to Trump's role in the January 6 Capitol riot.
The former president, who has pleaded not guilty to all charges in four criminal indictments this year, blasted attempts to remove his name from his ballot using the constitutional clause on Monday, remarking that most in the legal field have already called those efforts a long shot and warned that they could prove to be tricky water to navigate.
"Almost all legal scholars have voiced opinions that the 14th Amendment has no legal basis or standing relative to the upcoming 2024 Presidential Election," Trump wrote on Truth Social.
"Like Election Interference, it is just another 'trick' being used by the Radical Left Communists, Marxists, and Fascists, to again steal an Election that their candidate, the WORST, MOST INCOMPETENT, & MOST CORRUPT President in U.S. history, is incapable of winning in a Free and Fair Election. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!"
Newsweek reached out to Trump's attorney, Jesse Binnall via email for comment.
Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani previously told Newsweek that it's unlikely for the justices to side with Castro since Trump has yet to be charged or convicted of insurrection and rebellion.
"A conviction is not required under the plain language of the Constitution, but it's telling that even those prosecuting Trump don't believe that there is enough evidence to convict him or insurrection or sedition," Rahmani said.
Last edited:
compassionateExotic
Well-Known Member
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
If they find against P01135809, a dozen or more in both houses of Congress might get sucked under in the vortex of the sinking Traitanic.This is the biggest news on the 14th yet, we will know in a bit over a month if Trump is disqualified, I'm taking bets...
Supreme Court to decide whether to kick Trump off ballot
Castro v. Trump, a case challenging Trump's candidacy with the 14th Amendment, is expected to decided by the justices on or before October 9.
The legal debate about whether or not former President Donald Trump should be allowed to appear on the 2024 ballot has made its way before the Supreme Court.
The court distributed John Castro v. Donald Trump to the justices for conference on Wednesday ahead of the upcoming term, which will begin on October 2. Conference is to take place on September 26 and the case is expected to be decided on or before October 9.
Castro, a tax attorney running for the Republican nomination next year, sent his petition to the Supreme Court last month, asking the justices to answer whether political candidates can challenge the eligibility of another candidate of the same party running for the same nomination "based on a political competitive injury in the form a diminution of votes."
The lawsuit is seeking to argue that Trump should not be allowed to run for the White House based on section three of the 14th Amendment, which disqualifies individuals from holding public office if they have "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against the United States. While Trump has not been charged with insurrection, Castro is pointing to Trump's role in the January 6 Capitol riot.
The former president, who has pleaded not guilty to all charges in four criminal indictments this year, blasted attempts to remove his name from his ballot using the constitutional clause on Monday, remarking that most in the legal field have already called those efforts a long shot and warned that they could prove to be tricky water to navigate.
"Almost all legal scholars have voiced opinions that the 14th Amendment has no legal basis or standing relative to the upcoming 2024 Presidential Election," Trump wrote on Truth Social.
"Like Election Interference, it is just another 'trick' being used by the Radical Left Communists, Marxists, and Fascists, to again steal an Election that their candidate, the WORST, MOST INCOMPETENT, & MOST CORRUPT President in U.S. history, is incapable of winning in a Free and Fair Election. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!"
Newsweek reached out to Trump's attorney, Jesse Binnall via email for comment.
Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani previously told Newsweek that it's unlikely for the justices to side with Castro since Trump has yet to be charged or convicted of insurrection and rebellion.
"A conviction is not required under the plain language of the Constitution, but it's telling that even those prosecuting Trump don't believe that there is enough evidence to convict him or insurrection or sedition," Rahmani said.
Might should.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
I'm wondering about the story after looking at the tweet source and thread, posted on the 4th FFS and nobody picked it up except Newsweek? They made it sound like the call would be made by the SCOTUS, but nobody is talking about it, just the fact he filed lawsuits in a bunch of states.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
I suspect Mr. JA Castro is Bullshitting people on his twitter account and Newsweek picked it up. A search of google news for the story title came up dry, even though I saw the story on google news and posted it here hours before, so it is still up. I figured this would be big news, so I searched for other sources and came up dry and the tweet was days old. If it were, true Glen Kershner would be making a video in his pajamas right now and it would be all over the media.
Here is the only legitimate source on the story I could find. As far as I can determine he has no standing to sue.
Here is the only legitimate source on the story I could find. As far as I can determine he has no standing to sue.
Write-in candidate with 2 law degrees sues to keep Trump off the ballot; different challenge tossed
A law grad with a campaign website and a plan to launch a write-in presidential candidacy has filed several lawsuits contending that former President Donald Trump is barred from running under the 14th Amendment.
www.abajournal.com
Last edited:
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
OldMedUser
Well-Known Member
I think on Msnbc tonight they were talking about that and Tarrio's leader, tRump, should be getting a longer sentence than his underling. That's the way other cases like this end up. The prosecution wanted 30+ years so the judge went for less. Wonder how many tRump will get on conviction.
Budley Doright
Well-Known Member
How ironic! A net full of white fish lol.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
How much of this shit is Chutkan gonna take before, hauling Trump in and ripping a strip off his ass or just locking him up? Jack is complaining and he doesn't usually say much.
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
looks like another state is looking into the 14th......
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
here is the group doing the lawsuit:
www.citizensforethics.org
and here is the lawsuit itself:
the link in the article with take u to the lawsuit as well if you can't read it otherwise.....
Lawsuit filed to remove Trump from ballot in CO under 14th Amendment - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
Having disqualified himself from public office by violating Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, Donald Trump must be removed from the ballot.
www.citizensforethics.org
and here is the lawsuit itself:
the link in the article with take u to the lawsuit as well if you can't read it otherwise.....
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
how about the 100+ Congresspersons speechifying on Jan 6 to obstruct the certification?
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Some CONSERVATIVE legal scholars think so.... More on their participation might come out during the trials and deals to get sentences reduced by coughing up their heads. Maybe enough will come out to disqualify them but not convict them.