I have seen no hating
simply people who don't quite understand how things can work. I mean hey, i googled the "brand name" and one would have thoiught it would pop up top of google. Nothing other than various shops selling it. Hence the comments about this idea of simply suing is not entirely practical, nor is proving to a court that it is toxic entirely practical unless you have a spare 20K set aside you willing to chance with a law suit. Most don't have the luxuary of that kind of action so try a paypal claim and that is as far as it goes. I know my legal rights, and i know who to know with regard to creating an iron clad defence in court, so i'd buy it myself, but should it be toxic, you'll have a heck of a time closing that case to your favour, doable, buit a LOT of effort, time, and money.
The general rule of getting what you pay for came around for a good reason. As did the term buy cheap buy twice.
You talk as if proving it is tpoxic is simply a matter of having a smell and sending off an email, do you really think this is how suing someone works? So what equiptment is the OP going to buy or rent to take air samples to prove the toxicity, which laboritory is he going to pay to varify his readings? But yeayh easy as the click of a finger to sue for compensation over a scientific matter
Furthermore do you see how useless you have just declared yourself to this thread, you've just admited that it's not your problem so you couldn't care about what experience the OP goes through. The rest of us are trying to help him through voicing various thoughts, you simply couldn't care....
So to answer you question. Very.