You kind of ignored the rest of my post, to be fair; there were several a few other points in that post. In regards to your post I quoted here; I was under the assumption you were speaking from something more specific (You didn't add an "about" to your "1 in 300".) . Your math is still a little off this time around: 1/300=0.0033 (Rounded to the nearest 1/10,00), not 0.0025; that's a pretty big effective difference. One of the major points (among others) in my previous post, was to point out that the number of lawyers does not inherently indicate anything other than it is a desirable field of employment; it does not indicate motivation for joining that field. I wasn't trying to put your credibility into any sort of question. No, I am not a lawyer; though that is honestly irrelevant to the situation. However, were you a lawyer; it would validate my point somewhat.
Although, again I question the perception of "a pretty big difference", as I would call it negligible 
This is math based on public education man, it's not terribly out there.
There's just a lot of extra zeros, so it looks more obnoxious than it is.
This is math based on public education man, it's not terribly out there.
laugh i thought i'd die-die, you'd have to bury me, bury me in the ground,ground got worms,worms they tickle,laugh i thought i die,die you'd have to bury me bury me in the ground,ground got worms-----
I'll address your point in general. In what way is the general ratio unacceptable or unsustainable? As I stated in my previous post:Ah yes, it does look as though I goofed that math up, my bad
That said, I should have never used the general population (300mil) either. As we are speaking of employment and there are only approx 150mil jobs in this country. It would have been more accurate to say 1 in 150
My point in general is that this ratio is as unacceptable and unsustainable as the mortgage and real estate brokers of the 90's IMO
The fact that there's a lot of lawyers, does not =too many lawyers; you have to explain in precisely what way we have too many. We have an increasing number of laws, and an ever-expanding record of case law; both increase the need for lawyers over time, and neither solely indicates intent. So, as I asked previously: How is it unacceptable and unsustainable currently?
I'm pretty sure you'll just go to jail for leaving your marijuana unattended anyway. They say it had to be pretty much guarded at all times to make sure its not accessible to anyone other than you.
I'm pretty sure it's illegal even to give away for free unless you're the persons caregiver.