The Truth About Ron Paul - Part 2

Windsblow

Windsblow

Well-Known Member
Dan Kone said:
me too. I guess that's inconvenient for them though. IMO those letters were just Lincoln being a politicians, saying what he needed to in order to calm down the folks upset from thinking he was going to give black folks equal rights. To say Lincoln was pro-slavery is a pretty funny version of history though. One of their better re-writes.
Click to expand...
I don't think anyone claimed lincoln was pro-slavery. I know I never did. We just put the Civil War into the correct perspective. YOu guys only see, hear and learn what you want.
 
Windsblow

Windsblow

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
and we all get raises too! woo hoo!

i think that the turtles like ron paul because he has sex with them.

ron paul the turtle fucker.
Click to expand...
This guy is the most mindless human I have ever run a crossed. Don't expect to hear anything real come out of his mouth unless it is about children. He's a disgusting racist.

I doubt even grows pot let alone smoke it. I don't think he has ever posted in a grow thread. He's a troll and nothing more.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
budlover13 said:
LOL! Ignorance personified.
Click to expand...
i'll have the last laugh when "ron paul fucks turtles" makes it to google auto-fill :razz:

Windsblow said:
I would rather have sex with turtles than have sex with what you prefer.
Click to expand...
what, women?

oh, i see what you did there.

you tried to insult me by implying that i like to have sex with men.

which, in addition to being false, also intimates that you view homosexuality as somehow being inferior, or wrong.

some value system you employ there.

you reflect so well on the mormon religion. i bet your parents are mighty proud of you and your bigotry against gays.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Windsblow said:
This guy is the most mindless human I have ever run a crossed. Don't expect to hear anything real come out of his mouth unless it is about children. He's a disgusting racist.

I doubt even grows pot let alone smoke it. I don't think he has ever posted in a grow thread. He's a troll and nothing more.
Click to expand...
https://www.rollitup.org/attachments/gardening/1659141d1308700501-portland-area-gardening-cimg1989.jpg

just got these into the ground on the first day of summer.

now, as far as me being a "troll" goes, let's take a look at the definition of troll (we've done this before, remember?):

In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory...messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response.

so, your vile, hate-filled insults are somehow not inflammatory?

some reality you live in there.
 
Windsblow

Windsblow

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
https://www.rollitup.org/attachments/gardening/1659141d1308700501-portland-area-gardening-cimg1989.jpg

just got these into the ground on the first day of summer.

now, as far as me being a "troll" goes, let's take a look at the definition of troll (we've done this before, remember?):

In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory...messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response.

so, your vile, hate-filled insults are somehow not inflammatory?

some reality you live in there.
Click to expand...
Unlike you I do have a moral system. Somehow having no moral system is a better moral system than having a moral system? Do you hear yourself? Your circular logic is mind blowing.

Please I would love to hear more.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Windsblow said:
Unlike you I do have a moral system. Somehow having no moral system is a better moral system than having a moral system? Do you hear yourself? Your circular logic is mind blowing.

Please I would love to hear more.
Click to expand...
so, your point is that gays are immoral? :confused:
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
I'm starting to think Ron Paul does not really want to win himself...He knows that Fox News is not for him...He knows that his party leads does not want him to win..but yet he still made a choice to run under the Republican banner..If he was really serious about his movement and his cause wouldn't he run independent...he would have had a much better chance seeing that he won't even see the general election...IMO
 
budlover13

budlover13

King Tut
londonfog said:
I'm starting to think Ron Paul does not really want to win himself...He knows that Fox News is not for him...He knows that his party leads does not want him to win..but yet he still made a choice to run under the Republican banner..If he was really serious about his movement and his cause wouldn't he run independent...he would have had a much better chance seeing that he won't even see the general election...IMO
Click to expand...
i think he's got to sleep with the dogs and fight the fleas to have a chance in this two-party system(failure) that we have.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
tryingtogrow89 said:
What is it with gays being a priority with you?
Does your wife happen to have a penis, a nut sack, and testicles?
Click to expand...
civil rights for gay americans does rank right up there for me, but i think you may have missed something. or a whole lot.

if you read a few posts back, you will notice a certain poster attempt to portray me as gay in order to insult me.

i pointed out the bigotry behind this, at which point he declared that 'at least he has morals'.

so i posed the question of whether homosexuality was immoral.

that is when you showed up, apparently with no intent of reading or understanding the exchange within this thread.

capisce?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
budlover13 said:
i think he's got to sleep with the dogs and fight the fleas to have a chance in this two-party system(failure) that we have.
Click to expand...
ross perot stood a good chance at getting elected as an independent before he dropped out not but 15 years ago.

is submission to the two party system and status quo another value that ron paul lovers espouse?
 
budlover13

budlover13

King Tut
UncleBuck said:
ross perot stood a good chance at getting elected as an independent before he dropped out not but 15 years ago.

is submission to the two party system and status quo another value that ron paul lovers espouse?
Click to expand...
And have you seen the results of media coverage on Ross Perot during that election? The overwhelming public support until all the media slander? The media is powerful.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
budlover13 said:
And have you seen the results of media coverage on Ross Perot during that election? The overwhelming public support until all the media slander? The media is powerful.
Click to expand...
i thought ron paul was more powerful, according to you guys.

i mean, he will somehow give us all raises, surely he can employ chuck norris to deliver a roundhouse kick to the media.
 
budlover13

budlover13

King Tut
UncleBuck said:
i thought ron paul was more powerful, according to you guys.

i mean, he will somehow give us all raises, surely he can employ chuck norris to deliver a roundhouse kick to the media.
Click to expand...
If you can work it, i'll finance it to the best of my ability. He's not some all-powerful person that can fix everything. He's just honest.
 
tryingtogrow89

tryingtogrow89

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
civil rights for gay americans does rank right up there for me, but i think you may have missed something. or a whole lot.

if you read a few posts back, you will notice a certain poster attempt to portray me as gay in order to insult me.

i pointed out the bigotry behind this, at which point he declared that 'at least he has morals'.

so i posed the question of whether homosexuality was immoral.

that is when you showed up, apparently with no intent of reading or understanding the exchange within this thread.

capisce?
Click to expand...
All i know is you seem to have such a high emphasis on this matter, that is why i asked.
Gay marriage rights, seem to be a real home hitting issue with yourself.
moral high ground, or bigotry is besides the point.
A lot of your posts have such concern for this matter.
Homosexuality is really no ones business IMHO its a private personal matter, not a matter of national interests when, sorry if i offend you, there is far more important shit than gay marriage.
Besides the definition of marriage "a more or less durable connection between male and female lasting beyond the mere act of propagation till after the birth of the offspring." or "a union between a man and a woman such that children born to the woman are the recognized legitimate offspring of both partners."
Domt get me wrong, i believe that homo's or lesbos have the right to be with each other with the same legality of marriage, but it should not be labeled as marriage because its like these gay's want us to re write the meaning of what marriage actually means.
What ever happened to the good ol' days, when gays weren't all in your face about it?
This issue is stupid to bring to the table of national interests, when there truly are far more important matters at hand.
So when you always bring up gays, and gays, and more gays, it makes me wonder what and why that is personally your rebound and talking point.
 
Windsblow

Windsblow

Well-Known Member
Just to be clear... UB has brought up the GAy thing. I never once insinuated anything about his homosexuality. Him being GAY is not my business and I don't care where people put there penises. This guy does have sort of Gay on the brain for sure. If you read my post I was alluding to something entirely different but once again some people (UB) only hear what they want. I don't understand how people can scream equal rights for Gay's. WTF? Nothing is prejudicious about the current marriage laws. I can't marry a man and you UB can't marry a man. Both of us are equal under the law. Feelings don't equal rights and love is not legislative. We live in a bizarre world when we start using our erections as our moral, ethical and legislative compass. We live in a bizarre world.

Now back to reality. Ron Paul 2012
 
F

Flawed

Active Member
It's too bad RP wont ever get elected. I actually like his message, and it's about the only time I would vote repub. Last election he was always getting 3-5% of the vote, even with all the hype behind him. The 2 party system sucks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top