The LED "Arms race".....

coreywebster

coreywebster

Well-Known Member
nfhiggs said:
Nice numbers corey!
Click to expand...
Cheers, I actually did the last bits last night, which I had left because it was larf. Turned out most of it was solid stuff so there may be a little more than what I quoted. Possibly as much as 39 oz when the last bit is dry, with probably 1oz of that been fluffy larf which I wont count. Will sort thorough it when ready and make sure I'm only reporting on dense buds. But no matter which way it goes its a personal record, the last lot that came from the cob side was 25oz and that was a record for me too so I'm literally chuffed to bits with this run. (Which is why I had to bring it up in the first place , I cant exactly go tell my neighbours or friends) :-P
 
Chip Green

Chip Green

Well-Known Member
I also feel, as of right now, for ME, that there are SO MANY options available , at times design ideas can become counterproductive to the end goal. I've been guilty of fruitless expenditures of brain power and time, over potentially unnoticeable gains. The war within... Its working great, so I should make it greater????

Okay at some level, it is legitimate, to strive to improve..... but it can get outta hand, especially for a new builder as I still consider myself...
 
hillbill

hillbill

Well-Known Member
Many of us have lights that are being surpassed by the latest gains in efficiency and cooling. They become a little obsolete all the time even though they are superior to anything other than the latest COB and board products. We may have hundreds or thousands of dollars of quality discreet diode panels or early COBs. These are for all practical purposes as efficient and powerful as ever but there will come a point for me at least when the benefits of the new quiet and powerful creations outweigh the costs of upgrading. Not there yet but reading the LED forum is dangerous!
 
Chip Green

Chip Green

Well-Known Member
Okay, so here's a discussion from 18mos ago(ish)….

How many of us are still running the same equipment we had at that point....
Dose not matter, if you have added additional, newer equipment, upgraded generations ect….
Are you (or someone else) STILL growing plants, with the components you had in SEP of 2017????
 
tstick

tstick

Well-Known Member
Not me. I started out with fluorescents back in the 70's....switched to MH in the 80's....switched to HPS in the 90s....switched to COBs in the last few years....recently bought a Nextlight (Samsung chips)...currently looking at some T5 fixtures (just because)....and also considering a CMH fixture....probably switch to lasers when the tech becomes available!
 
Rocket Soul

Rocket Soul

Well-Known Member
Id +1 on cmh
- very full and balanced spectrum
- easy to grow with
- beats its on paper performance in real life.
- good production per square foot.
 
hillbill

hillbill

Well-Known Member
hillbill said:
Many of us have lights that are being surpassed by the latest gains in efficiency and cooling. They become a little obsolete all the time even though they are superior to anything other than the latest COB and board products. We may have hundreds or thousands of dollars of quality discreet diode panels or early COBs. These are for all practical purposes as efficient and powerful as ever but there will come a point for me at least when the benefits of the new quiet and powerful creations outweigh the costs of upgrading. Not there yet but reading the LED forum is dangerous!
Click to expand...
My latest addition is a Northern Grow Lights Photon 180 Citizen COBs 3500k 90cri from the days before HLG going on 3 years and still use old Optic 120 and A51 SGS160, XGS190, RW75 (least used) and W90 COB. Different combos when needed but use just whites and run those bigger A51 Cree panels very low and 120 watts and 130 watts respectively. Some are 6 years old.

Still waiting to upgrade as these have been so good and such a change from HPS. I know I can pick up some efficiency so sometime maybe. Not a single problem from any of the fore-mentioned products. Passive cooling will a requirement when I do update.
 
Budies 101

Budies 101

Well-Known Member
The end game is simple to me...

A long florescent bulb with high end LEDs that retro fit into t5/t8's.

I bought some 140 lm/w bulbs and run them in my t5 or t8 I forget. I use 2 of the 4 bulbs because with 4 going I burned the plants...

At some point we will buy bulbs that do 180+ lm a watt for 5-10 bucks and stuff them in T5's T8's. You can buy these lights on craigslist for 50 bucks. You will be able to build lights as good as we make them today for less than 100$ and they will grow the same. In fact I don't understand why it's taking so fing long for someone to talk to a builder in china and get they to put lm301 b's in a florescent light bulb. There are a few but they charge like 50 bucks or more and they're still not the best chips.
 
PSUAGRO.

PSUAGRO.

Well-Known Member
Yes, retrofit bulbs would be ideal for affordable entry.....problem is those end-cap drivers aren't matching dedicated ones like mw, which hampers system efficiency. Also bypassing fluoro ballast loses the fixtures ul/etl certs.......if that matters.
 
Budies 101

Budies 101

Well-Known Member
PSUAGRO. said:
Yes, retrofit bulbs would be ideal for affordable entry.....problem is those end-cap drivers aren't matching dedicated ones like mw, which hampers system efficiency. Also bypassing fluoro ballast loses the fixtures ul/etl certs.......if that matters.
Click to expand...

Yes, but the point is at some point people will start manufacturing these lights with LED in mind as LED have and are further taking over. Thus we will get fixtures for dollars and bulbs for dollars.
 
TEKNIK

TEKNIK

Well-Known Member
Retrofit tubes are not good for 2 reasons, they can not heatsink enough so you get fast light decay, the drivers also get far too hot for this reason and cause reliability issues, A 5 meter reel of good constant voltage strip will outperform a retrofit tube, you could make 4 tubes from one reel
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Two comments;
1. Cost is the new frontier; anyone can build a 70% efficient light but it will be extremely expensive. Getting the cost down for a given level of performance is going to be the new standard to beat going forward.

2. Never rule out a big tech innovation that changes the game or how it's played. LED is just as susceptible to such black swan events as any other tech. I should know, I'm working on one myself... :cool:
 
Chip Green

Chip Green

Well-Known Member
When there are new innovations released, indeed things can change. What does not change, is the usability of the now "obsolete" tech. I did my first few builds with Gen1 Bridgelux EB strips, two years ago. Every piece is still running, in perpetual garden setups. As new options emerge, it takes nothing away from the productivity of the old. Since I'm not compulsive about minor gains in efficiency, still riding on the initial investments in emitters, is plenty satisfying.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Chip Green said:
When there are new innovations released, indeed things can change. What does not change, is the usability of the now "obsolete" tech. I did my first few builds with Gen1 Bridgelux EB strips, two years ago. Every piece is still running, in perpetual garden setups. As new options emerge, it takes nothing away from the productivity of the old. Since I'm not compulsive about minor gains in efficiency, still riding on the initial investments in emitters, is plenty satisfying.
Click to expand...
Yep, just like an old car- it's paid for!
 
Thundercat

Thundercat

Well-Known Member
Chip Green said:
When there are new innovations released, indeed things can change. What does not change, is the usability of the now "obsolete" tech. I did my first few builds with Gen1 Bridgelux EB strips, two years ago. Every piece is still running, in perpetual garden setups. As new options emerge, it takes nothing away from the productivity of the old. Since I'm not compulsive about minor gains in efficiency, still riding on the initial investments in emitters, is plenty satisfying.
Click to expand...
This is what I've been thinking through this whole thread and many of the LED threads. Some of these guys are constantly chasing the newest most efficiant gear. I really think its laughable.

I totally get the massive jump in efficiancy that happens between HPS and LED. That makes enough sense in the long run.

If your current lights were kick ass and awesome yesterday, they still will be tomorrow even if there is a more awesome light too.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
It also pays to keep in mind that much of the march of advancement has to do with reduced cost for the same tech. That doesn't change performance at all.
 
Thundercat

Thundercat

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
It also pays to keep in mind that much of the march of advancement has to do with reduced cost for the same tech. That doesn't change performance at all.
Click to expand...
Reduced cost for the same tech is the correct direction. Getting over 3.0 efficacy is great and all, but not if the light costs 9x what an HPS does. But if the market gets the 2.3-2.5 range down to $1/w on prebuilt fixtures, then you will see a massive shift towards LED.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top