The 2021 State of the Union, go Joe!

Was Biden's State of the Union Speech Great


  • Total voters
    16

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
To summarize an entire group of people is exactly discrimination. To assume that I want women barefoot in the kitchen is idiotic.

The attacking illustrates how willing anyone is to actually having a discussion.

Relax, smoke a joint and move on. I didn't know I would trigger everyone by saying to keep tabs on him. He is a POLITICIAN. for fucks sake, you cant trust any of them.

Back to work so I can have 40% of my pay stolen by the government!
And we should just trust that you are a real person.

Screen Shot 2021-04-30 at 11.57.31 AM.png

Impressive, you've already earned over $200k this year huh.

It must be nice to have all those employees/customers that make your work possible with all their government funded educations.
 

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
To summarize an entire group of people is exactly discrimination. To assume that I want women barefoot in the kitchen is idiotic.

The attacking illustrates how willing anyone is to actually having a discussion.

Relax, smoke a joint and move on. I didn't know I would trigger everyone by saying to keep tabs on him. He is a POLITICIAN. for fucks sake, you cant trust any of them.

Back to work so I can have 40% of my pay stolen by the government!
Please stop paying taxes and stay off our roads
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
What was she even doing there, she is not a senior party member and nobody of consequence. An example of republican "leadership" and a sad joke, she should have been the last person invited. I'm surprised they didn't have Matt Gaetz give the rebuttal speech, she's still supporting him and that shows the level of her judgement, that and the Anglo Saxon caucus idea.
isn't Matt Gaetz party leader now? i mean he's one the front page every morning now with the same Trumpian hijinx..so he must be.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
No, it isn't. We're not treating them badly. We're not making them suffer because of the color of their skin or their religion or their sexual preference. We're not writing laws to disenfranchise them.

We simply don't give a shit what they think because what they think are that whites are superior, that women belong barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen, that gays should still be stoned to death and that blacks shouldn't vote and still be property.

There's a distinct difference between the two.

Again, that you are completely clueless as to which is which tells everybody exactly which group you are in.
+rep:clap: bravo!

it's amazing how simple this all really is.

given the choice (and it's already happened/happening) Big Corp will break for the 70% over the 30%- any day.

after all, who do you think spends $1k yearly at Apple to have the purple one?

1619799245790.png

they'll do anything for their Board Room penny or Holy Grail- The Split.
 
Last edited:

topcat

Well-Known Member
To summarize an entire group of people is exactly discrimination. To assume that I want women barefoot in the kitchen is idiotic.

The attacking illustrates how willing anyone is to actually having a discussion.

Relax, smoke a joint and move on. I didn't know I would trigger everyone by saying to keep tabs on him. He is a POLITICIAN. for fucks sake, you cant trust any of them.

Back to work so I can have 40% of my pay stolen by the government!
Enjoy the pavement you drive on, clean, running water and sewage treatment, oh yeah, fire protection, just for starters. Rave on, socialism!
 

CapnBligh

Member
Enjoy the pavement you drive on, clean, running water and sewage treatment, oh yeah, fire protection, just for starters. Rave on, socialism!
I don't mind paying for those at all. Those are great and necessary things. That isn't a construct of socialism, that is a fair society. Everyone should be protected and safe. Sheesh, nice jump there buddy.
 

mooray

Well-Known Member
I don't mind paying for those at all. Those are great and necessary things. That isn't a construct of socialism, that is a fair society. Everyone should be protected and safe. Sheesh, nice jump there buddy.
I don't know why people fight the socialist angle so hard, or...I guess I do, it's because they're binary and have trouble reconciling something they like with something they don't like, when they're in the same category. It's not hard though, it's just...a little is good, but more is too much.

Anyway, start by realizing that no economic system has ever existed in its true form. In practice, there hasn't ever been a true system of capitalism, socialism, or communism. The services topcat described are unquestionably socialist aspects that exist within a mostly capitalist hodgepodge. The only issue is how hard people want to work to deny the reality of it .
 

topcat

Well-Known Member
I don't mind paying for those at all. Those are great and necessary things. That isn't a construct of socialism, that is a fair society. Everyone should be protected and safe. Sheesh, nice jump there buddy.
But, but, taxes! See how your "fair society" schtick goes over with your Republicon friends. It's good to have a buddy.
 
Top