Standing O..Bernie Sanders!

desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
How many SOS's have had technology?

This shit gets made up as they go.

A millennial witch hunt desertdumdum<hug>
Click to expand...
The technology part is irrelevant. If Hillary had 100 file cabinets in her basement full of every piece of correspondence during her tenure, the result would be the same. She was briefed on the proper handling of information. She signed the NDA acknowledging that she understood the legal requirements about handling classified information. If somebody else had diverted government email to a non-government server they would already be in jail.

<edit> if the choice is between Hillary and Bernie, then Bernie is the obvious choice, so we agree on that point.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
The technology part is irrelevant. If Hillary had 100 file cabinets in her basement full of every piece of correspondence during her tenure, the result would be the same. She was briefed on the proper handling of information. She signed the NDA acknowledging that she understood the legal requirements about handling classified information. If somebody else had diverted government email to a non-government server they would already be in jail.
Click to expand...

 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
Yeah, that's fucked up. I don't support the military industrial complex, and neither does Sanders, regardless of your belief he does based on his vote to fund the troops fighting in the Iraq war

If you were in his position, would you vote to defund the war, even though you know it won't amount to ending the war, it would only amount to more attacks against you politically, or vote to fund it, knowing it will be funded anyway, with or without your vote?

Politics is an art, just like negotiation and economics. It's not an exact science like math and physics. You're holding Sanders to a black and white standard while dismissing the necessary gray area required for compromise and progress.
Click to expand...
Republicans hate compromise. It implies that there are other valid views besides theirs. Therefore the black and white thinking, to keep the fooled in line.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
Is Hillary the only SoS in history to have no classified correspondence? More than 30,000 emails deleted because they were "private". LOL.

If Hillary is not indicted, it will be another blow to the rule of law in the US. One set of laws for the peons, no laws for royalty.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/clinton-signed-nda-laying-out-criminal-penalties-for-mishandling-of-classified-info/

The NDA signed by Hillary:
http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/HRC-SCI-NDA1.pdf
Click to expand...
does it make you sad that no one likes your post, george?

and just why did you study to be a cop at napa JC by the way?
 
FauxRoux

FauxRoux

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Click to expand...
While I admire your distaste for government and complete unwillingness to compromise your moralality.....If your going to go so far as to call Bernie sanders a rapist you could at least offer an opinion of something better. It's easy to shoot things down, but without an alternative suggestion its about as meaningful as my tottler refusing her green beans. I mean... I would be happy to make her an alternative but I'm not going to guess until she's into it, and ice cream for every meal isn't an option.

Not GOP said:
Sounds like it could be a reason to support Donald Trump as well
Click to expand...
Just stop. You have been found to be deficient. Now go sit in the corner and think about all the stupid things you've said and write im sorry on the board 100times. Troll:dunce:
 
Not GOP

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
FauxRoux said:
Just stop. You have been found to be deficient. Now go sit in the corner and think about all the stupid things you've said and write im sorry on the board 100times. Troll:dunce:
Click to expand...
Couldn't help but notice that instead of showing how it's not true, you instead call it stupid. That seems to be your reponse for a lot of things you can't refute.
 
FauxRoux

FauxRoux

Well-Known Member
Not GOP said:
Couldn't help but notice that instead of showing how it's not true, you instead call it stupid. That seems to be your reponse for a lot of things you can't refute.
Click to expand...
The sad part is even your rebuttles are just a copy paste of what others say.....and their just as invalid in the context you use them as the crap you quote from politicians.

That must be hard for you. But then again...ignorance is bliss.
 
Last edited:
Not GOP

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
FauxRoux said:
The sad part is even your rebuttles are just a copy paste of what others say.....and their just as invalid in the context you use them as the crap you quote from politicians.

That must be hard for you.
Click to expand...
People quote politicians all the time. You posted that it's stupid to assume Trump is not controlled by corporate money and outside interests. How so?
 
FauxRoux

FauxRoux

Well-Known Member
You really need to stop infering things that arent said. I said teump IS corperate interest and private money.

How is this so hard for you?

People do quote politicians. But it helps to know why what they say is meaningful and IF its true. You just parrot shit and decide what it does or doesnt mean....just like in your last post with me.
 
Not GOP

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
FauxRoux said:
You really need to stop infering things that arent said. I said teump IS corperate interest and private money.
Click to expand...
So because he's a successful business man and has money that automatically discludes him from being a good president? Most people could argue the exact opposite
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Not GOP said:
So because he's a successful business man and has money that automatically discludes him from being a good president? Most people could argue the exact opposite
Click to expand...
he;ll be even more successful once he hits six bankruptcies instead of a mere five.
 
FauxRoux

FauxRoux

Well-Known Member
Believing paety lines as opposed to actually takimg the time to look into someone history and judge them by their actions is stupidity beyond words.....hell there's even a quote of Trump readily available online from the 90's I belive, saying how if he ran for president he would run as a Republican as they would be dumb enough to vote for him and he would probably win.
 
Not GOP

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
FauxRoux said:
Believing paety lines as opposed to actually takimg the time to look into someone history and judge them by their actions is stupidity beyond words.....hell there's even a quote of Trump readily available online from the 90's I belive, saying how if he ran for president he would run as a Republican as they would be dumb enough to vote for him and he would probably win.
Click to expand...
what? I can't understand your post. check it, and then try again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top