Scott Walker...F##K Yeah

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You know nothing about me.
As usual you make shit up and sling it around hoping some will stick.

Quote me saying any of that crap.
don't have to.

all i have to do is ask you if you support legislating into law common sense measures that would keep high powered semi automatics with high capacity magazines out of the hands of the unfit.

do you plan to vote for the people who will legislate limits on high capacity magazines? plan to vote for the people who will legislate truly universal background checks? plan to vote for the people who will legislate laws pertaining to locking up guns when not in use? plan to vote for people who will legislate laws against bringing your mentally deranged kid to the gun range for target practice?

you tell me. you don't strike me as the liberal type.

:lol:
 

AlecTheGardener

Well-Known Member
don't have to.

all i have to do is ask you if you support legislating into law common sense measures that would keep high powered semi automatics with high capacity magazines out of the hands of the unfit.

do you plan to vote for the people who will legislate limits on high capacity magazines? plan to vote for the people who will legislate truly universal background checks? plan to vote for the people who will legislate laws pertaining to locking up guns when not in use? plan to vote for people who will legislate laws against bringing your mentally deranged kid to the gun range for target practice?

you tell me. you don't strike me as the liberal type.

:lol:
Bucky, it takes me personally less then 1.25 seconds to complete a magazine change on my AR-15. 1.25 seconds will not save many lives.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It is certainly easier than having an honest debate.
an honest debate would involve you cretins dropping the "i care about kids" tact and just admitting that you are religious nanny state collectivists who can't stand seeing women have the freedom to control their own bodies and medical decisions.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
You keep telling yourself that, those of us old enough have heard it time and time again. Then the impossible happens and whoops, eight years of a Republican in the White House.

I'm an anti-theist, my disgust and position on partial birth abortion has nothing to do with religion. Anyone defending it is a piece of shit of the highest order. You can argue 12 weeks, 20 weeks, whatever, that shit is heinous.
more heinous than this when you don't have the money?..to put this burden on the taxpayer?

The average cost of raising a child born in 2013 up until age 18 for a middle-income family in the U.S. is approximately $245,340 (or $304,480, adjusted for projected inflation), according to the latest annual "Cost of Raising A Child" report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.Aug 18, 2014
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Bucky, it takes me personally less then 1.25 seconds to complete a magazine change on my AR-15. 1.25 seconds will not save many lives.
loughner was taken out when he went to change his mag.

many kids escaped certain death at the hands of lanza when they fled the room between mag changes.

and not everyone is gonna be as skilled or quick at changing a mag as a former military vet.

and besides, if it even saves one life, isn't that what these women-controlling righties want? to save the lives of innocent kids?

or is that just their pretense?
 

AlecTheGardener

Well-Known Member
loughner was taken out when he went to change his mag.

many kids escaped certain death at the hands of lanza when they fled the room between mag changes.

and not everyone is gonna be as skilled or quick at changing a mag as a former military vet.

and besides, if it even saves one life, isn't that what these women-controlling righties want? to save the lives of innocent kids?

or is that just their pretense?
I see your point! It is a bit silly to talk about saving lives and then turn your nose up at legislation that would result in less death.

Hypocrisy.

However I suspect this falls under liberties as some would suggest in their arguments.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I see your point! It is a bit silly to talk about saving lives and then turn your nose up at legislation that would result in less death.

Hypocrisy.

However I suspect this falls under liberties as some would suggest in their arguments.
yep, the price of freedom.

the price of freedom is a perfectly good argument to use when you're talking about hundreds of school children dead at the hands of a gunman with a high capacity semi automatic that they can obtain without a background check.

but the price of freedom is unacceptable when a woman has a late term abortion after suffering health issues that threaten her life.

freedom: for men with guns, not women with health issues stemming from their pregnancy. even if that pregnancy was caused by rape.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
You think there is no dirt the mainstream media has not hammered? Her being dead broke was just a blip for a few days, let Biden start hammering that little bit of unreality and it will matter again. Any little gaff of hers that was overlooked will be magnified. We'll get to hear that the death of Stevens didn't really matter. Just about anything that can be taken out of context will be and used against her.

Study after study shows the negative campaigning works, why do you think Clinton is immune to this?
what study after study?

:lol:
 

AlecTheGardener

Well-Known Member
what study after study?

:lol:
Hatred and annoyance results in a larger reaction then those who are comfortable and complacent.

Tell someone that the U.S. has an estate tax, little reaction.

Tell the same person that the U.S. has a 'death tax,' bigger reaction, likely more requests for explanation.

Carl Rove runs his life on negative campaigning, he prefers that pubs run negative campaigns because he thinks they are more effective. They are.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
If we knew them all they wouldn't be skeletons would they?

Whatever they are, you'll dismiss them, so don't worry about any of that nonsense.
kinda the same way you dismiss rawn pawl's newsletters and nanny state collectivism (see HR 7955) or rend pawl's plagiarism and coordination with the white supremacists at A3P?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You still pretending anyone believes or cares what you have to say? cute, but pathetic.
when rend pawl seeks the nomination, how much attention do you think he will get for the favct that he coordinated with the white supremacists at A3P?

how much attention do you think he will get for speaking out against civil rights, like you do?
 
Top