romney knows hurricane clean up

FreedomWorks said:

Why did you quote me before posting that graph?

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

to demonstrate that you are ignoring evidence that does not suit your hypothesis.

Click to expand...

FreedomWorks said:

Show me the average temperatures in America from the 1930s in comparison of how hot it has been for the past ten years. Your 1987 graph proves nothing.

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

yep, it's all just a hoax cooked up by scientists for measly research grants.

ignore the big oil companies hiring faux scientists, don't follow that money. follow the more piddling and insignificant amount of money, it will lead you right to the iran-syria border.

Click to expand...

NLXSK1 said:

I think you are confusing scientists with saints.... LOL!!! Flounder...

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

not even your paid faux scientists are peddling that "it's a hoax" bullshit anymore, kiddo.

Koch Brothers-Funded Climate Scientist Says He Was Wrong, Global Warming Is Real And Man-Made


http://www.disinfo.com/2012/07/koch-brothers-funded-climate-scientist-says-he-was-wrong-global-warming-is-real-and-man-made/

Click to expand...

NLXSK1 said:

Gee, you found another one...

Funny thing is science is not based on consensus even if there was such a thing about the topic.

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

more lies from the floundering fuckwit.

Report: 97 percent of scientists say man-made climate change is real


http://content.usatoday.com/communities/sciencefair/post/2010/06/scientists-overwhelmingly-believe-in-man-made-climate-change/1#.UJMhMN1km2k

Click to expand...

NLXSK1 said:

That report was debunked years ago. Many of the scientists on the list later came out and said that they were misrepresented.

Climate change is real. How much man's influence on it is really the only debate.

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

no citation whatsoever on your part, just more lies from the floundering fuckwit.

move on, kiddo.

Click to expand...

Well, yes. If I was told that, say, 97 percent of dentists agree that chewing Trident is better for your teeth than chewing bubble gum, that would make perfect sense. Trouble is, the idea that “97 percent of publishing climate scientists agree” human activity has created an out-of-control global warming crisis is a myth.To cop the immortal words of Rowdy Roddy Piper in the B-movie classic “They Live”: I have come here to chew bubble gum and debunk this myth … and I’m all out of bubble gum.
One of the most commonly cited studies of the “97 percent” was conducted by a University of Illinois professor and a graduate student who asked the following questions to 10,257 Earth scientists working for universities and government research agencies:
Q1. When compared with pre‐1800s levels, do you think that mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?”
Q2. Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?
They received responses from 3,146 people, of which only 5 percent self‐identified as climate scientists. To get to the magic 97 percent in the affirmative to both questions — in the answers to questions even many skeptics would answer “yes” — the study’s authors had to whittle down the survey to a paltry 79 “climate scientists,” defined as those who also have “published more than 50 percent of their recent peer‐reviewed papers on the subject of climate change.” The National Academy of Sciences survey is similarly skewed.
So, bottom line: A handful of “qualified” scientists asserting “fact” is not what it seems. Yet the enviro-left still clings to this fraudulent “argument by authority” nonsense.
Now that we’ve established the fraud of the “97 percent,” let’s move on the the Australian coverage — which features a new study entirely based on the fraud. Read it all yourself, but I love this quote best:

“[AGW Skeptics] will say science doesn’t work by vote, it’s about facts.”
​

Wait a minute? I thought the votes of 79 carefully screened climate scientists was supposed to be determinative? I guess that’s the case … except when it’s not. I’m confused. Doesn’t science work, not by vote, but by the examination of facts to test hypotheses? I think they teach that in middle school. By this “voting” standard, “American Idol” is science!
And let’s not even get into the meat of this Australian survey — which is of 200 “pedestrians” in Perth. Quite the sample. I really hope it’s not just people pulled off the street in front of local pubs.
So, the take away from this ridiculous study and article is this: If you push the lie that “97% of publishing climate scientists agree that global warming is a direct consequence of the burning of fossil fuels by humans” to random passersby in Perth … they will tend to believe your lie, your argument to “authority.”
In other words, bad science plus bad polling gets the results the warmists want. What a surprise! A good gig, if you can swing it.
Look at Climate Change Reconsidered and Climate Change Reconsidered: 2011 Interim Reportfor peer-reviewed rebuttals to climate alarmism. And for B-movie fans, here’s the classic “They Live” clip about chewing bubble gum, if you haven’t already clicked through.

Click to expand...

NLXSK1 said:

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/sciencefair/post/2010/06/scientists-overwhelmingly-believe-in-man-made-climate-change/1#.UJMld8XA-31


Debunked...

They used a false subset of scientists mostly not involved in climate change science to make up a bullshit 97% statistic that they continuously parade around for the uninformed...

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

are you on crack?

they only took the opinions of those who were climate scientists who had more than 50% of their peer-reviewed studies in the field of climate science.

that makes them mostly involved, not "mostly not involved" as you claimed. you stupid lying sack of shit.

you just debunked that in the same way you proved that iran is landlocked, you floundering fuckwit.

try again, kiddo.

Click to expand...

NLXSK1 said:

yes, they ended up with 79 scientists in their study and concluded that 97% of them answered 2 biased questions in a way that they could say they all agreed.

It was bullshit, is bullshit and will continue to be bullshit.

Only someone who desperately wants to believe in global warming would eat this shit up.

Congrats on being in favor of spending other people's money in your agenda to save the world... Fucking parasite....

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

awwww, are you all butthurt and angry that i caught you in yet another lie?

so sad.

here's the lie, yet again, for everyone to see...

• “climate scientists,” defined as those who also have “published more than 50 percent of their recent peer‐reviewed papers on the subject of climate change.”
  
  
  ​

  
  
  ​

• scientists mostly not involved in climate change science​

  
  
  ​

how does it feel to get caught in yet another lie, kiddo?

does it feel bad to see your bullshit getting called out for what it is?

Click to expand...

beenthere said:

No lies here dipshit, it's opinion not fact!

Click to expand...

beenthere said:

No lies here dipshit, it's opinion not fact!

Click to expand...