Religion Has Done More Bad Than Good

fish601

Active Member
But why put it there? That is the big part of this that does not make any sense. He did not have to do that. Really does God need a tree of knowledge?

If not for that one thing, the bible would not even need to have been written, because we would never would have had sin! That one tree undid everything and resulted in every single act of violence throughout our history, just that one tree has caused people to falsely burn thousands of women at the stake for being witches, enslaving entire races, the haulocaust, gay people, abortions, murders, theivery, murder, rape, everything!

Just that one tree is the reason for it all. So why would he put it there?

Unless he wanted to see us all suffer. Because we are talking about gods will. And it would not have been there if it was not his will.
with out a choice we wouldnt of had free will and without free will we would of just been robots. God wants us to choose him and he made it really easy
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
i am not capable of cracking them i am not even trying,, all this is doing is making me think how silly evolution is something that i once accepted and how right and well thought out the bible is NOW i know there are some very hard to understand scriptures but i believe there is enuf evidence to prove its the word of god and i just have to accept the hard to understand ones
I pretty much was pissed for a bit after seeing this, since I took it as a slap in the face for trying to have a civil discussion with you and you saying it is silly, especially after I took hours to try to help you see the science of the math and data collection practices using actual evidence and not just bs and yelling. But I think that I had misread it.

If not let me know so that I can take offense.

But if my re-reading of it is right, and you are just saying that you are more strengthened in your beliefs then all is good, and I am happy for you being satisfied and confident in them.

But here is my question for you, how do you feel about what I had said? And tell you what ask your preacher about it, and please report back on how he/she answered it.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
with out a choice we wouldnt of had free will and without free will we would of just been robots. God wants us to choose him and he made it really easy
But without that tree we would not be able to have free will? Wouldn't that just mean that we would not go to hell for our decisions?
 

fish601

Active Member
But without that tree we would not be able to have free will? Wouldn't that just mean that we would not go to hell for our decisions?

why didnt god just put the people who were going to believe in heaven and the ones that didnt in hell? why even be born why not go straight to heaven or hell? why even be made at all? why does any of this exist?

god wanted it that way and he is in charge
 

fish601

Active Member
I pretty much was pissed for a bit after seeing this, since I took it as a slap in the face for trying to have a civil discussion with you and you saying it is silly,
the thought of us forming out of a big bang and evolving sight is a roadblock to me.. how did our dna even know that with eyes we could see.. how did our dna know that with 2 eyes we could judge distance? how did we know there was color available? dont say mutation unless you can tell me what the chance of that is 1 in what? its impossable for that to of just envolved
and that is just an eye there are so much more amazing things about us ..




But here is my question for you, how do you feel about what I had said? And tell you what ask your preacher about it, and please report back on how he/she answered it
I dont ask a preacher because they will just tell me what they believe.. i want to know the truth.. just like i dont take scientist word (not that they are always wrong) but i like to hear all sides and form an opiniion based off all the information.
 

greenmama

Member
Have you ever heard of Zeitgiest? or Zietgiest; Addendum? You can watch these very impressive documentaries on google video for free. I recommend everyone watch this... It relates to religion, politics and moving into the future. Let me know what you think if you watch it.
 

sandmonkey

Well-Known Member
Have you ever heard of Zeitgiest? or Zietgiest; Addendum? You can watch these very impressive documentaries on google video for free. I recommend everyone watch this... It relates to religion, politics and moving into the future. Let me know what you think if you watch it.
I did.

Thought it was a rip-off of many other more in-depth documentaries, and actually serves the same system it claims to bash.
 

Nocturn3

Well-Known Member
fish601 said:
the thought of us forming out of a big bang and evolving sight is a roadblock to me.. how did our dna even know that with eyes we could see.. how did our dna know that with 2 eyes we could judge distance? how did we know there was color available? dont say mutation unless you can tell me what the chance of that is 1 in what? its impossable for that to of just envolved
and that is just an eye there are so much more amazing things about us.
I thought we'd already covered this, but it appears that you still don't get it. DNA doesn't "know" anything. The reason these mutations were so successful is because they were beneficial to the creatures involved. Natural selection took care of the rest.

Regarding the evolution of eyes, I refer you, again, to the wiki article. Since there is little chance of you reading it, and even less chance of you comprehending it, here's a video that you may be able to digest a bit more easily.


fish601 said:
I dont ask a preacher because they will just tell me what they believe.. i want to know the truth.. just like i dont take scientist word (not that they are always wrong) but i like to hear all sides and form an opiniion based off all the information.
That's a good approach, in theory. However, you seem to have some real problems processing any information which is contrary to your beliefs. You also have a lack of understanding of science, and scientific methodology, which leads you to approach problems from the wrong end.

I think it's just easier for you to believe than it is to actually learn.
 

pinkus

New Member
Have you ever heard of Zeitgiest? or Zietgiest; Addendum? You can watch these very impressive documentaries on google video for free. I recommend everyone watch this... It relates to religion, politics and moving into the future. Let me know what you think if you watch it.
i thought it was excellent... don't know how it could be construed as sand monkey did.
 

sandmonkey

Well-Known Member
Because Peter Joseph is pushing forward the same agenda as the men behind the curtains.

His 1st part about Horus, Mithra, etc. is full of more errors than historical/mythical accuracy.

The part about 9/11 is just a crappy rip-off of Loose Change.

The third part about the Federal Reserve was just a way to shift the blame and our hate to a transient government body.

In short, this "documentary" is for people new to conspiracy theories; who think that by watching this crap they've now gotten such secret knowledge and know the whole truth.

Gimme a f'in break.
 
P

PadawanBater

Guest
the thought of us forming out of a big bang and evolving sight is a roadblock to me.. how did our dna even know that with eyes we could see.. how did our dna know that with 2 eyes we could judge distance? how did we know there was color available? dont say mutation unless you can tell me what the chance of that is 1 in what? its impossable for that to of just envolved
and that is just an eye there are so much more amazing things about us ..

I dont ask a preacher because they will just tell me what they believe.. i want to know the truth.. just like i dont take scientist word (not that they are always wrong) but i like to hear all sides and form an opiniion based off all the information.

Fish, do you read the stuff we type on this thread?

We've been over the eye, and this entire concept you keep bring up of taking the conclusion of our reality - us existing - then backtracking from there.. It's OBVIOUS why you have a hard time grasping the theory of evolution, and that's not me being condescending or anything at all to you.

Imagine flipping a coin, it lands heads, then you say "see, there is absolutley NO WAY that coin could have come up tails!" - that is exactly what you're doing with evolution. You believe in the creation story. You believe that's how we came to be how we are today, that's why you cannot see any other possible outcomes to our existence. To you, creation is the answer and evolution is impossible... in your own words.
 

pinkus

New Member
Because Peter Joseph is pushing forward the same agenda as the men behind the curtains.

His 1st part about Horus, Mithra, etc. is full of more errors than historical/mythical accuracy.

The part about 9/11 is just a crappy rip-off of Loose Change.

The third part about the Federal Reserve was just a way to shift the blame and our hate to a transient government body.

In short, this "documentary" is for people new to conspiracy theories; who think that by watching this crap they've now gotten such secret knowledge and know the whole truth.

Gimme a f'in break.
some people ARE new to any theories that contradict the line toted by the elite.

people are NOT going entertain much beyond that at their meal of alternate knowledge.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
In the end all conspiracies have one fatal flaw of logic. They all take for granted that these intricate plots are continued year in and year out, ppl passing secret knowledge and power. All quite complicated and flawed.
Humans just can't usually pull that sort of thing off for long.

So as opposed to deep plotting and masterminding for centuries of hidden control, it's more likely to be just like the cops kicking in the door on D.C. Mayor Barry standing in a hotel room with a crack pipe.
 

fish601

Active Member



We've been over the eye, and this entire concept you keep bring up of taking the conclusion of our reality - us existing - then backtracking from there.. It's OBVIOUS why you have a hard time grasping the theory of evolution, and that's not me being condescending or anything at all to you.

Imagine flipping a coin, it lands heads, then you say "see, there is absolutley NO WAY that coin could have come up tails!" - that is exactly what you're doing with evolution. You believe in the creation story. You believe that's how we came to be how we are today, that's why you cannot see any other possible outcomes to our existence. To you, creation is the answer and evolution is impossible... in your own words.
nothing can create everything? big bang

how did we know sight was available and how did we know it took an eye to see it? go back to the beginning of the development of an eye.. why start to develop something that was useless.. it took time for it to envolve into a working eye.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Just because you find a gap in our scientific knowledge (before the big bang), doesn't mean it's time to insert a 2000 year old myth as the answer.

Science has accurately gotten us to the point of origin. Outside of a primitive allegorical book which you think is true, because the book says its so :roll: (this is critical thinking?), Religion has NO answers to anything. Yet, you give it EQUAL footing.

The problem isn't with science The problem lies with you.

Just because you don't have the XYZ of an equation worked out, doesn't mean inserting ABC is correct.
 

snail240

Well-Known Member
Marry was a whore get over it! How can she be a virgin with all them fine sheep around? Who knew all she had to do was where a wool rug on her back to create gods sun. Jesus was the sun of a sheep hence why all the people that beleive in him follow blindly.
 

edwardtheclean

Well-Known Member
i dont think it is religion, its humans using it as an excuse, Christ is the man, but that does not mean that christians are all ok, same with islam, islam could be peaceful but the uneducated people that take it way to serious make it all a mess, i am a christian, but i would never tell a muslim he would go to hell or anything, i dont beleive it,
i think any smart person would agree that there are good people and bad people.
i think the catholic church is a joke, but i dont tell my best friend he is following a fools path, because people could say the same to me, and a story from the crusades say that the muslims were actually way more merciful than the christians, like i would know tho, but my point is, if every one followed what their religion says to do, then the world would be a great place, but instead, people fight over the "holy land", does anyone really think God cares about a small piece of land???? i doubt it, anyways, i know that i was raised to respect people and their beliefs, i think most americans are raised that way, am i wrong????
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
I dont ask a preacher because they will just tell me what they believe.. i want to know the truth.. just like i dont take scientist word (not that they are always wrong) but i like to hear all sides and form an opiniion based off all the information.
I can appreciate this. But that begs the question why go to church at all?

the thought of us forming out of a big bang and evolving sight is a roadblock to me.. how did our dna even know that with eyes we could see.. how did our dna know that with 2 eyes we could judge distance? how did we know there was color available? dont say mutation unless you can tell me what the chance of that is 1 in what? its impossable for that to of just envolved
and that is just an eye there are so much more amazing things about us ..
Yeah this is hard to get. But remember when we were talking about forensic study, you start at the present and continue to work backwards in time with the evidence that you have.

So we start with what we have, two color eyes. The reason why they are in the front of the face and not the sides is so that we can judge distance. You need two eyes to really get good perspective (Because one won't give you the depth). Put something small in front of you in the middle and close one eye and then the other. Having two eyes gives you a much better view of small objects and where to handle them. We covered the color part, because it is easier to see predators and prey in the jungle so we would survive better.

Interesting fact if you were not already aware. Land animals have developed the location of their eyes based on where they are in the food chain. If you see eyes on the side of the head it almost always (I say almost again because there may be somethign somewhere, but I doubt it) are the prey animals. They use the side eyes to track animals trying to flank them and since they don't need to worry about depth perception to eat grass or leaves it works well. Predators (meat eaters) almost always have eyes in the front of the head so that they can have that depth view when in battle.



Ok anyways sorry.

So we move back through evolution and get more and more primitive eyes colorblind, ect.

Eventually we need to figure out why we have eyes, so more it turns into a study of where they eye developed.

Here is a good cut/paste from:http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/01/1/l_011_01.html

The simple light-sensitive spot on the skin of some ancestral creature gave it some tiny survival advantage, perhaps allowing it to evade a predator. Random changes then created a depression in the light-sensitive patch, a deepening pit that made "vision" a little sharper. At the same time, the pit's opening gradually narrowed, so light entered through a small aperture, like a pinhole camera.

Every change had to confer a survival advantage, no matter how slight. Eventually, the light-sensitive spot evolved into a retina, the layer of cells and pigment at the back of the human eye. Over time a lens formed at the front of the eye. It could have arisen as a double-layered transparent tissue containing increasing amounts of liquid that gave it the convex curvature of the human eye.

In fact, eyes corresponding to every stage in this sequence have been found in existing living species. The existence of this range of less complex light-sensitive structures supports scientists' hypotheses about how complex eyes like ours could evolve. The first animals with anything resembling an eye lived about 550 million years ago. And, according to one scientist's calculations, only 364,000 years would have been needed for a camera-like eye to evolve from a light-sensitive patch.
Wow just found this try it (directions below picture):


Close your left eye and stare at the cross mark in the diagram with your right eye. Off to the right you should be able to see the spot. Don't LOOK at it; just notice that it is there off to the right (if its not, move farther away from the computer screen; you should be able to see the dot if you're a couple of feet away). Now slowly move toward the computer screen. Keep looking at the cross mark while you move. At a particular distance (probably a foot or so), the spot will disappear (it will reappear again if you move even closer). The spot disappears because it falls on the optic nerve head, the hole in the photoreceptor sheet.
Also I found that if you look at it about a foot from the screen and simply turn your head in a 'no' way with one eye closed you lose sight of it too (kind of disapears).



Anyway.

Did you know?
Like some other lizards, the Asian water dragon has a light sensitive spot located on top of its head known as the "parietal eye".

The light sensitive spots can be found in nature. Now most will have a more delevoped form as well. But you figure that you can feel the suns rays on your skin right, that would be a good place for the mutation to begin very early on. The mutation would allow just a sensitivity to light that would move to the next step, pigment cup.


Flat worms have this pigment cup.



Then Pin hole sight:

Pinhole eyes, in which the size of the pigment aperture is reduced, have better resolution than pigment cup eyes. The most impressive pinhole eyes are found in the mollusk genus Nautilus, a member of a cephalopod group that has changed little since the Cambrian period.
Ok the rest is pretty followable from there. So we got the eye development down.



Life:

If you can follow down to the eye, the next step is to get to the first lifeforms. We discusses this before. Basically it comes down to a bunch of factors that this planet had going for it. We are a good distance from the sun without being too far. So we are not too hot or too cold. Then you have a collision with another planet that spins off the moon (or moon is huge compared to its planet) this slows the spin rate to create the 24 hour day, and no crazy storms.

Then also this keeps our planet's crust/core from fully forming (like mars) into one mass so we get plate techtonics, This means that we get volcanoes that heat up water, and nasty checmicals in the air. This mixing with water, chemicals, temperature, lightning, oxygen, ect all created a brew for the earliest particles that made the first life on our planet to form.

This has been done in lab experiments http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/05/ribonucleotides/


So now we have life that through billions of years evolved to today.

So how did the earth form:

Basically our solar system was all a bunch of hurdling rocks gravitating around our star (that is hurdling through space). And those rocks bumped more and more int eachother until planets where formed.


http://ircamera.as.arizona.edu/astr_250/Lectures/Lec_22sml.htm

Here is a more readable one that I linked the other day: http://geology.about.com/od/nutshells/a/aa_earthbirth.htm


So then through the math that I had talked about earlier, we can follow the paths of these different solar systems and things in space to one central point. For that central point to be there that would mean that they had to of all at one point been apart of eachother. Right now the most scientific reason is the big bang theory. I think eventually it may somewhat be replaced, but the thing replacing it will still hold that is a point where one large explosion happened, but it could be something like that was one of many 'massive black holes' and there were several 'big bangs' which when you follow those back you find yet again one spot, on and on.



Anyway when you start from the info that we have, and real world examples, and math the timeline goes like this: Giant explosion that sent material out>> Material circles around the sun (large gravitational force that causes all debri to surround and rotate around it) >> material bumps into eachother and forms planets >>> planets collide and create moon and slow earths rotation allowing for plate techtonics and easier weather >>> weather mixed with several other factors shocked by lightning creates earliest particles of life >>> Life particles mix together and create earliest forms of life >>> Those mutate and combine to make newer more complex lifeforms >>> Lifeforms develop special advantages like light sensitive skin cells (seen today on some animals) >>> Those pigment cells develop further in lifeforms like flat worms that allows then to mutate into a more cave type depression to focus the light changes >>> Then more mutations form the pin hole eye >>> Eventually a skin is put over it (mussels) >>>> Turns into a lens (Octopus) >>> Evolution pushes water animals to develop into land life, where the eye is even more advantagous that in water so it further develops and speciallizes depending on the hunting paterns of the animal >>> Eventually humans evolve with color sight that allow them to see animals in the jungle.


And there you go, big bang to color sight.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
All things Christian spring from the Catholic Church. If it is in error, all derivatives have the same errors.
It all starts with the BIG lie. The BOOK was written by G*D. Once u swallow that one...the rest of the craziness follows in totem.
 
Top