if I may say it another way also, if I have seen something beautiful and I want to share that with you, do I describe it to you, or do I point to it and you discover it for yourself, or not. Do you see that the description is not the described? And I am off to bed, Thank you for sharing.my parents tried but that wore off when i got a car and moved into the garage, then that was the entirety of my life from 03-05 when i was dod property, but since, no ive been on retirement since i was 26, im 29 now, 3 years of doing whatever the hell i want and receiving a paycheck every month, which should actually post into my acct in 2 hrs 20 min.. then its wafflehouse time
What are you looking for?i dont see what im looking for.
pointing and allowing for individual discovery would have a deeper impactif I may say it another way also, if I have seen something beautiful and I want to share that with you, do I describe it to you, or do I point to it and you discover it for yourself, or not. Do you see that the description is not the described? And I am off to bed, Thank you for sharing.
No, not at all. And not now either. AND thank you for stopping by, actually I am off to bed unless there is anything pressing for you that matters that you would like to inquire into togetherFirst psychadelic experience right now Landmark?
Then I would not want to interfere with that.pointing and allowing for individual discovery would have a deeper impact
...the non-physical locales are like receptors for a plus or a minus. I'll use the term 'bubble' here to get a point across, not to claim that people are in a 'bubble'. I 'see it' as bubbles that are in constant contact but yet glance off of each other in polarity.Is one pointing to everything/nothing?
For those interested...as a consideration
there is a center, "a me", that me is brought about through experience, images, stories. That center creates barriers about itself, through thought, by conditioning..."i am a_____",
"i believe ____", "i dont believe in_____", " i will never_____", "people are_____". So that center operates when in contact with another, constantly judging, assessing, evaluating, it exists in a world of morality, good/bad, right/wrong, justify/blame, it dominates/avoids domination. It is a reaction to life happening now, in the present moment. Being a reaction, can that center ever be in relationship, for where I am the other is not.
Can we meet in a totally new way?
In every case I can imagine, it is by being in nearly the same place at exactly the same time.Lets begin here,
How do we meet each other?
And one discovers the beauty of music there also...look for self, never find - outside, or inside. In between, that's where the heat is Beyond the split.
Has imagination, knowledge, thought brought us together? Or has it created a division, a 'me' imagining, a 'me' thinking, a not 'me'?In every case I can imagine, it is by being in nearly the same place at exactly the same time.
The trouble is that the word "meet" is prone to serious semantic differentiation. I used the most common meaning of "meet" to answer the question, If however you define "meet" in a lesser but still valid meaning, for instance "arrive at a consensus", the answer changes.
In order to advance the discussion out of the uselessly vague, I would ask you to supply what you mean in this instance by words that have an unfortunate tendency toward vagueness - the sort of vagueness that can affect outcome to the point of complete paradox. And who wants that!? cn
when there is no polarity?...the non-physical locales are like receptors for a plus or a minus. I'll use the term 'bubble' here to get a point across, not to claim that people are in a 'bubble'. I 'see it' as bubbles that are in constant contact but yet glance off of each other in polarity.
"morphing us?"
Wu wei (simplified Chinese: 无为; traditional Chinese: 無爲; pinyin: wúwéi, variantly written in Chinese: 無為 is an important concept of Taoism (Daoism), that involves knowing when to act and when not to act. Another perspective to this is that "Wu Wei" means natural action - as planets revolve around the sun, they "do" this revolving, but without "doing" it; or as trees grow, they "do", but without "doing". Thus knowing when (and how) to act is not knowledge in the sense that one would think "now" is the right time to do "this", but rather just doing it, doing the natural thing.when there is no polarity?
The question is vague enough to make an effort to answer fraught with unreliability.Has imagination, knowledge, thought brought us together?
How can "knowledge etc." create a division? This question is also too vague, too enamored of mirage semantics, to be honestly answered.Or has it created a division, a 'me' imagining, a 'me' thinking, a not 'me'?
and yet you did precisely that. I ask plainly and directly: Clarify your terms.Not stepping over the request for a definition of the word meet,
Not having a description available, I cannot assign a "beyond".isn't that what were looking at, beyond the description?
Sir or Maam, I am not interested in what your after. I am not here to provide you with more wise beautiful information, insight. I am here to discover, together. You want the description, when the fact is there for you to see. You are not willing to look, for yourself, maybe one has not explored that as a possibility? If information is what your after please pass over this thread, it will be of no use to youThe question is vague enough to make an effort to answer fraught with unreliability.
How can "knowledge etc." create a division? This question is also too vague, too enamored of mirage semantics, to be honestly answered.
and yet you did precisely that. I ask plainly and directly: Clarify your terms.
Not having a description available, I cannot assign a "beyond".
As for what we are looking at ... I do not know what we are looking at.
I am straining to detect wisdom or beauty in the things you are asking. A forum like this is a purely verbal medium, and depends on clarity to convey any sort of useful or wise or beautiful information. If your motive to post here has owt to do with wisdom andor beauty, you will stop responding to questions with questions, unless the questions in question serve the definite purpose of clarifying in your mind what I am saying. Such questions are emphatically not vague.
Yes i am, i act like an idiot quite often and laugh about it, or not, and clean up whatever mess there is to clean up after it is seen that one has behaved so. Do you see yourself in the mirror? That you suffer your own judgement?Your a fuckin IDIOT son what a waste of time.