topcat
Well-Known Member
The excuse used by both Sinnerma and Munchin of bipartisanship is disingenuous at best. Last month they both voted for a "carve out" of the law in order to raise the debt limit, but not protections of voting, or spending that would benefit their constituents. Priorities, right? "Going nuclear" happens all the time, just not for good stuff. It's saved for appointing judges and such.