You realize that Obama didn't go out and collect 6 million muslims from all over and put them in concentration camps and gas them for the purposes of ethnic cleansing right?I admit the use of Hitler stirs up emotion, especially when you mention dead Jews.
Hitler didn't kill 6 million Jews! The people did!
Obama didn't kill any Muslims! The people did!
And I never said Obama was some incarnation of Hitler.
I did not say we are in a Nazi State committing genocide either.
The concept I'm trying to bring across is very linear.
Are we closer to the ideals of Benjamin Franklin, or Adolf Hitler.
Your attempt to discredit the parallels, without justly weighing them.
Hell, I have more animosity towards Jews(Zionist) then Obama.
I could have swore the Nuremberg trials really happened, but I must have imagined them.Still trying to figure out how that was "legal."
I didn't vote for Obama, so what do you want me to do? Kill him?I blame you, and I blame me. This vessel elects it's leadership, therefore the crew is to blame.
If your only tool is a hammer, every problem is handled like a nail.I didn't vote for Obama, so what do you want me to do? Kill him?
He is a political figure, everything is fair game.Does it bother you that you're comparing Obama to Hitler for a hypothetical problem that doesn't exist yet? Or is that fair game now?
Ok. But this thread is comparing him to Hitler for not solving a problem that doesn't actually exist yet. Is that reasonable?He is a political figure, everything is fair game.
Not like other political personalities have been compared to Hitler and worse.
I haven't proposed anything hypothetical.Does it bother you that you're comparing Obama to Hitler for a hypothetical problem that doesn't exist yet? Or is that fair game now?
clearly....I haven't proposed anything hypothetical.
I'm afraid you may have failed to grasp the main concept of this thread.
No, I think your poll took care of that.In fact, the idea is that you are the first to directly compare Obama to Hitler, and are the one continuing to do so.
Very sensible decision you made there. Well done.My use of Hitler, was to propose a polar opposite to Franklin.This was to make a scale for the voting process.
I went with the option where we weren't on the path to committing genocide on 6 million jews.The question I put forth, is where would you put us on that scale.
Just heading towards it. Got it. Yeah, don't think we are on the path to killing 6 million jews.I did not propose that we were on either end of said scale.
I see. And you think this is a real problem?Rather that the scale was tilting and we were sliding in that direction of a "Gestapo" society.
If it were legal there wouldn't have been war crime tribunals and executions of convicted criminals.It was legal in germany, because it is what the majority wanted, therefore it was legal for them. I guess.. Might be a bit historically incorrect, but you get the gist.
Was is legal to invade Iraq in 91'?If it were legal there wouldn't have been war crime tribunals and executions of convicted criminals.
Says he who picked Benjamin Franklin "freedom."This thread has proven something though. 66.67% of people voting in this poll so far are retarded.
I didn't like the question. So I too refrain from voting. Even though I have my suspicions Obama might be a tyrant. First there needs to be proof of his Kenyan citizenship. Then I'll vote for MTV.because there was no option for "i like turtles", i chose "none of the above" by refraining from voting.