skunkdog
Well-Known Member
your lucky his nut are nt white, and u dont have to put sun cream on them
your lucky his nut are nt white, and u dont have to put sun cream on them
Few breeds seem to have the propensity to grab onto something and hold on in the manner pits do. Why is that? Because, none of these breeds were bred to handle large, AGGRESSIVE cattle. I ask again, how many of you pit owners have handled cattle, especially uncut bulls? If you haven't, if you've just watched them from the other side of the fence, then I'll suggest you try getting up close and personal with an animal that is not Daisy the dairy cow (which can still be a rough animal to handle, they will knock you about with their heads quite easily). Speaking of hard heads, would you say pits don't have them? They surely are copiously muscled, and with mighty big jaws to go along with, to boot.
You've found the single video of the single comparison that seems to be available. However, are you going to use this to say that a cocker spaniel's attack is going to have the same results as that of a pit? I don't think we can take the results from three representatives of their breeds as the end-all be-all in definitive science, do you?
This is the thing people are failing to appreiate, on an overall level, and it's really rather like fishkeepers who are so surprised that their fish ate that other fish and it wasn't "supposed" to. Of course, any dog is going to bite. But that Chihuahua that's so foul-tempered? It's going to barely break the skin. Put that aggression and personality into an animal with a relatively massive head and neck, what do you think is gonna happen?
The current situation as it stands now does not negate how the breed came to be in the first place, and frankly I fail to understand why anyone would insist that dog breeds were not bred for specific traits. I mean, what else is the point of breeding? There's a reason why pit bull breeds are called what they are. The only thing modern breeders seem to be doing now, with the exception of those who breed actual working dogs, is to breed for type and conformation. We're not talking about individual dogs here, we're talking about breed types and making generalizations. For every instance of exception one can come up with, another can refute.
So, if I understand you correctly, you're saying that Ridgies were not bred for guarding the farm, the stock, or for hunting lions, yes? If so, then why is it also known as the African Lion Hound? Why were they selected in the manner they were? Pick any other breed or breed type, and explain how it came to be if it weren't because it was being bred for a purpose.
If so, then why are terriers even called terriers? Why would border collies, when not presented with animals to herd, still feel the need to herd, even to the point of dangerous behaviors such as "herding" passing cars? Just because an individual within a breed does not display all breed characteristics does not equate to that breed NOT being bred for those very characteristics. I think you're really way off base in that assertion.
You didn't really read my post thoroughly. You're already on the defensive about your dog, and honestly you should be. You should be, specifically because of his size and power, on the lookout for any of these traits that might make him a dangerous animal. You're reading a bias where it doesn't exist, unless you're reading that comment about a nip from a pit being a little like a taste from a great white as a "bias". Personally, I DETEST allowing any dog to lick me. It makes my skin itch and it's just fucking creepy when they sneak the lick in, especially on the back of my leg.
Excuse me? I don't think you are anywhere close to knowing me well enough to draw any sort of comparison, even one like that.
well, I'm a bit behind now, but I'll go by what I scanned over:
i know that MOST pits are nice, sweet dogs, just like most goldens, labs, collies, etc.
however, when a pit has a bad day, and/or decides to attack. They finish the job. i was attacked by a golden once, it was lost and scared and it bit me when I tried to meet it (I figured, hey, it's a golden, they're ALWAYS nice, right?) but anyway, I booked it to the nearest pickup and jumped into the bed. The golden was content with that.
When pits attack they finish the job, they break bones, tear flesh, they destroy things.
It's also true that by the numbers, pits attack FAR more than almost any other dog. Goldens and Labs make up a huge number of the dogs in america (close to 200k) and together they bite more people than pits. But pits don't stop attacking until they've finished the job. a bite from a golden or lab is just that, a bite.
if a pit bites you it's going to bite again, and again, and again.
and THAT is a factor of the DOG BREED. not the owner, not anything else, it's just how they are. when they attack, they KILL.
I did a google search for "killed by retriever" and "killed by pitbull"
the retriever stories were all about retrievers getting killed except for a couple dogfights.
the pitbull stories were about pits killing people and dogs.
difference.
That's not a good point. Being the stoners you guys are, you should know that the media only produces information that they think the public wants to hear.point is, you have to HUNT to find a story of someone getting killed by a lab/golden, whereas you can find PAGES of pit attacks without any effort at all, even though goldens and labs outnumber pits by a ridiculous margin.
PITS ARE MORE PRONE TO ATTACK AND KILL THAN OTHER DOGS.
there is no denying the numbers
You don't think the public would want to hear "Boy dies after wippet attack"?That's not a good point. Being the stoners you guys are, you should know that the media only produces information that they think the public wants to hear.
Then you must have not read my entire post that engendered the response. Or you would have caught that I have indeed handled them (though not owned a purebred). You're also getting something that isn't there with me--a disdain for the breed. That is not my own stance. I actually have a very strong disdain for Bulldogs whose faces have been so pushed in that they cannot breath, and whose bodies have been so scrunched up that they have intestinal troubles. However, I don't have a problem with the dogs themselves. I have a problem with the humans who have bred them for these traits.Of course I get defensive. He's like my son. (Until I actually have one of my own.) So when people talk about pits in a negative manner I feel they're attacking my moose as well. Huh? I didn't act, pretend, or insinuate that I knew you. I stated that if you've been around something you usually get a feel for it. Your opinion changes of it. Plain and simple.
well, I'm a bit behind now, but I'll go by what I scanned over:
i know that MOST pits are nice, sweet dogs, just like most goldens, labs, collies, etc.
however, when a pit has a bad day, and/or decides to attack. They finish the job. i was attacked by a golden once, it was lost and scared and it bit me when I tried to meet it (I figured, hey, it's a golden, they're ALWAYS nice, right?) but anyway, I booked it to the nearest pickup and jumped into the bed. The golden was content with that.
When pits attack they finish the job, they break bones, tear flesh, they destroy things.
It's also true that by the numbers, pits attack FAR more than almost any other dog. Goldens and Labs make up a huge number of the dogs in america (close to 200k) and together they bite more people than pits. But pits don't stop attacking until they've finished the job. a bite from a golden or lab is just that, a bite.
if a pit bites you it's going to bite again, and again, and again.
and THAT is a factor of the DOG BREED. not the owner, not anything else, it's just how they are. when they attack, they KILL.
I did a google search for "killed by retriever" and "killed by pitbull"
the retriever stories were all about retrievers getting killed except for a couple dogfights.
the pitbull stories were about pits killing people and dogs.
difference.
Can't you participate in a debate without the insults? After all, it IS against the rules to insult others on this site.I mean c'mon...are you retarded or just ignorant?
:
I gave you a verbatim quote of what I searched. i have no reservation that goldens bite more people. there's just too many of them. HOWEVER, pits not only kill more people, but per dog the attack rate is exponentially higher.Oh yeah... somehow the GOOGLE i use produced slightly different results.
( see how any side can spin a story their way)
Golden bites baby...
http://www.understand-a-bull.com/Articles/OtherBreedBites/2008/September/yellow lab bit toddler deemed not dangerous 0908.pdf
Lab Bites baby....
http://www.understand-a-bull.com/Articles/OtherBreedBites/2008/September/lab shepherd mix 0908.pdf
Husky mistakes newborn for toy ...eww that ones icky
http://www.understand-a-bull.com/Articles/OtherBreedBites/2008/September/husky kills infant 0908.pdf
I mean c'mon...are you retarded or just ignorant?
Pit bull attacks are much more media friendly...cuz pit bulls are sccaaaarrry.........oooooooooooohhhhhhhh
Nobody wants to hear about a lab biting grandma because then you have to be mad at the lab and then you would have to admit that...well you get my point this is ridiculous...
fdd----great thread
I asked a warranted question of someone who stated many...many...many...untrue facts and sorry..Can't you participate in a debate without the insults? After all, it IS against the rules to insult others on this site.
I think that is a good questionI mean c'mon...are you retarded or just ignorant?
fdd----great thread
I gave you a verbatim quote of what I searched. i have no reservation that goldens bite more people. there's just too many of them. HOWEVER, pits not only kill more people, but per dog the attack rate is exponentially higher.
pit bull attacks are more media friendly because pit bulls DEMOLISH people. LOOK AT THE NUMBERS.