No Bush sent troops to Iraq when he should have finished the war in Afghan....Most everyone supported the war in Afghan..not Iraq....Obama had to finish our first war..Man you guys are funny..No worries most people see right thru you
I wear mine like a badge of honor..Simple means that what I'm saying is the truth and "THEY CAN"T HANDLE THE TRUTH" lol .....but you know we going to plus +rep each other back...
Continue to insult us. Continue to polarize us. Continue to straw man us. And of course, continue to -rep us. It does NOT make you right.
I smell a rep war, not picking sides.
You're right - it doesn't matter. In the real world, and in my profession, ethos matters very much. I have to remind myself that this is the internet and it is not way reflects or manifests daily reality. And I love argument and debate in real life, but again, I must remind myself that this is the internet - argument and debate do not take place. Instead, it's belittling and an obsession with winning. I have to constantly remind myself that arguing on the internet is like racing in the special olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded.
Dude you shouldn't have said that because my cousin has down syndrome, so offended right now.
Post reported! LOL! Not really.
Sorry. Double post.
Nope. I refuse to encourage the rampant abuse of elite members by becoming elite myself. Since the debacle two weeks on this section, 4 or 5 thoughtful, polite individuals have been run off or banned and you and Cracker have suffered no repercussions. Why can't you just allow us to have our opinions? Why must you insult us? You and Cracker use such a high and mighty tone, berating EVERYTHING we add to the discussion. Here's how the dialogue occurs here:
This is a declarative statement, so you shouldn't have any trouble backing it up with some facts. As we all know personal attacks are against RIU policy, so I for one would like to know, who is it who systematically bulliest those on the left, until they are forced to leave the forum (assuming I understood your words correctly).
Well, I never said you insulted me directly. I said you were insulting. But the insult was indirect and a direct reference to another member's complaint about me.
But keep up the whining. It's very entertaining!
Indirect insults are thrown around all the time on here, Johnny. Liberals are pussies, republicans are stupid, etc...... It's commonplace. Direct insults should be reciprocated with -rep, but I did NOT insult you. I didn't even know who gave the guy -rep. He said he had received -rep from numerous people because of comments that I thought would be acceptable for certain others on this forum. I believed him because, as you proved, certain elites do give -rep because of other people's positions. So I gave him +rep to help him out. I then said that anyone who gives -rep because of bitterness or a chip on their shoulder is DISLIKED by me. DISLIKED!!!!!!!! If this doesn't apply to you, then so be it. So what's your fuckin' problem? I'm not allowed to dislike shit?
That bold section of your post is a blasted lie. Here is the quote to which you responded.
Anyone doubting me is free to follow this link directly to the -repped quote.
What's wrong with saying "I dislike -rep given due to bitterness and a chipped shoulder"? I do dislike it. If it happens, I dislike that it happens. I also dislike broccoli. If you like broccoli, will you -rep me?