Organics ARE chemicals

doc111

Well-Known Member
I don't have time to read 11 pages of ramblings (even interesting ramblings) but I have to say something...

Everything on Earth is made up of chemicals, this is true. Some chemicals simply don't exist anywhere in the natural world.

To say that detrivores and microbes break organic amendments down into 'chemical fertilizer' is so, so far short of the big picture. It is really an insult to the soil food web and everything that is part of it.
When you force feed your plants with synthetic nutrients chelated with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, you have the burden of providing the plant with every component that it requires to sustain itself. You would also have to provide any other things that the plant maybe doesn't require, but which would accelerate growth and vigor. You have the burden of keeping things balanced.

Detrivores and microbes do so much more than break organic matter down into 'chemical fertilizer'. Aside from the primary components the plants require, they provide for things like anti-biotics, vitamins, amino acids, etc.
That was a pretty good post............up until the last part. Anti-biotics? Vitamins? Amino acids? I wasn't aware that beneficials provided these things. If you have a link or something to back that up I would be most interested in reading it. I think I know what you are trying to say but the way you've worded it seems very misleading to me.:-?
 

madodah

Well-Known Member
I feel this thread has probably confused more growers new to organics than it helps. To assume a majority of growers accustomed to using bottled supplements of any type for NPK values would actually be interested in the actual science, much less the soil food web, would be highly speculative. Instant gratification regardless of consequences seems to be the general motivation for most cannabis growers, with simple research to gain knowledge considered superfluous. To assume most have any consideration for environmental preservation, soil or anything else, blasphemy.
 

Spanishfly

Well-Known Member
hey guys sorry i missed the fun.. i heard spanishfly was acting like a stuck up spaniard again.. what a princess he must be
You only heard??? Didn´t make the effort to read the thread then??

And who you calling a Spaniard???? Sure hope it wasn´t me.
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
I feel this thread has probably confused more growers new to organics than it helps. To assume a majority of growers accustomed to using bottled supplements of any type for NPK values would actually be interested in the actual science, much less the soil food web, would be highly speculative. Instant gratification regardless of consequences seems to be the general motivation for most cannabis growers, with simple research to gain knowledge considered superfluous. To assume most have any consideration for environmental preservation, soil or anything else, blasphemy.
Organics is a bit confusing to most, no thanks, in part, to all of the inflated or bogus claims made by snake oil salesmen and hucksters in both the medical mj and food industries. Chemistry, biology, botany are subjects most people I knew either slept through or just simply did poorly at. I was always interested in this stuff so I took all the classes and read all the books on these subjects that I could. It's complicated, confusing, and we still don't know everything. As far as modern science has brought us, we are just beginning to understand the symbiotic relationships between plants, fungi, and bacteria. Learning the basics of how a plant functions would go a long way to dispelling many of these myths. Unfortunately most people only care about results. Results are indeed important but I like knowing the "hows" and "whys' and I believe it has made me a much better gardener as a result. Happy growing to all and keep it green!:weed:
 

Spanishfly

Well-Known Member
Epsom Salt is a mineral.

Named after the town it was originated: Epsom, England

And Salt: Because it bares a resemblance to Salt

It is NOT a SALT
OH YES IT IS !!!!!!!!!!!

A salt is formed when an anion combines with a cation.

There are trillions of compounds that come into this category - copper sulphate, silver nitrate, calcium carbonate, ammonium sulphide are all salts, as indeed is sodium chloride, the salt we sprinkle on our food which is referred to as COMMON SALT.

And Epsom salt - magnesium sulphate, Downonwax, which is indeed yet another salt.

The ignorance in this forum is reaching a new low.
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
OH YES IT IS !!!!!!!!!!!

A salt is formed when an anion combines with a cation.

There are trillions of compounds that come into this category - copper sulphate, silver nitrate, calcium carbonate, ammonium sulphide are all salts, as indeed is sodium chloride, the salt we sprinkle on our food which is referred to as COMMON SALT.

And Epsom salt - magnesium sulphate, Downonwax which is yet another salt.

The ignorance in this forum is reaching a new low.
Yeah! You came back to share some knowledge! Thank you!:clap:
 

Spanishfly

Well-Known Member
You came back to share some knowledge!
Time some was injected.

And I am still waiting for someone to actually define the term CHEMICAL without which this thread disintegrates into complete nonsense.

What is a CHEMICAL, anyone ????
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
Time some was injected.

And I am still waiting for someone to actually define the term CHEMICAL without which this thread disintegrates into complete nonsense.

What is a CHEMICAL, anyone ????
Chemicals are everything! We are surrounded by chemicals. The air we breathe, the water we drink and the food we eat are all chemicals. For some reason there is a negative connotation with the word and most people often equate "chemicals" with something man made or harmful. We are nothing more than a mass of sentient chemicals.:eyesmoke:
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
Here is wiki's definition of a Chemical Substance::leaf:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_substance




Definition
Chemical substances (also sometimes referred to as a pure substance) are often defined as "any material with a definite chemical composition" in most introductory general chemistry textbooks.[2] According to this definition a chemical substance can either be a pure chemical element or a pure chemical compound. However, there are exceptions to this definition; a pure substance can also be defined as a form of matter that has both definite composition and distinct properties.[3] The chemical substance index published by CAS also includes several alloys of uncertain composition.[4] Non-stoichiometric compounds are a special case (in inorganic chemistry) that violates the law of constant composition, and for them, it is sometimes difficult to draw the line between a mixture and a compound, as in the case of palladium hydride. Broader definitions of chemicals or chemical substances can be found, for example: "the term 'chemical substance' means any organic or inorganic substance of a particular molecular identity, including - (i) any combination of such substances occurring in whole or in part as a result of a chemical reaction or occurring in nature"[5]


I thought they did a pretty good job. :clap:
 

Spanishfly

Well-Known Member
So is water a CHEMICAL? - OK it has a definite chemical composition.

So the thread title - Organics are Chemicals means absolutely nothing. This one is getting into silly arguments about semantics - time to go and grow some mega bud.
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
So is water a CHEMICAL? - OK it has a definite chemical composition.

So the thread title - Organics are Chemicals means absolutely nothing. This one is getting into silly arguments about semantics - time to go and grow some mega bud.
Absolutely water is a chemical! A vital one, but that is for a different thread.;-) The title refers to styles of growing. One takes advantage of organic waste products from decaying plant and animal matter, utilizing the naturally occurring phenomenon of symbiosis. This is where beneficial microbes and fungi live in and on/around the roots. These complex communities perform specific functions which have some benefit to each other such as breaking down organic molecules into inorganic forms the plant can use, in exchange the plants provide sloughed off root cells and secretions of sugars and proteins which feed the microbes. In nature these things mostly work in a natural harmony, but indoors, in containers, we are trying to mimick nature in an efficient manor. Our crops grow quickly and require massive amounts of nutrients compared to many other plant species. It can be difficult and messy to maintian a true organic style of growing, but certainly it can be done especially if a gardener really knows what he/she is doing. Indoors, I prefer using both organic and "chemical" methods because I have better control and can quickly fix any deficiencies. I don't have a lot of time to be preparing a lot of teas and all the stuff that goes along with true organic gardening. Outdoors, I wouldn't even consider using chemicals, er synthetic.............inorganic chemical compounds for fertilizers. lol! :weed: Here is a little article that talks about the Rhizosphere and how the uptake of different ions affects the pH of the Rhizosphere. Fascinating stuff. :sleep: J/K. It's not that long at all. :lol:


http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/e/jel5/biofilms/rhizosphere.html
 

Matt Rize

Hashmaster
i said "salt". lololol. i have actually learned A LOT from this so called troll thread. if this is how troll threads go, we need more of them. anyone ever use "pepper"? ;)
This guy, lol. Pepper, yes, in my horticultural oil infusions. Black peppercorn, pink peppercorn, white... they all work.
A serious answer to a non-serious question ;)
 

Matt Rize

Hashmaster
I understand that petroleum is technically organic, but in the context of a horticultural discussion, it is not. It basically comes down to semantics. Organic chemistry is different from organic horticulture, despite the fact that the two are linked.

I agree that it is mostly a personal preference thing. I think a healthy plant is a healthy plant, my focus is environmental sustainability. Heavy metals are a legitimate concern though. Ingesting/inhaling them can't be good for you (Same reason I avoid eating fish.), especially for those with health issues. My experience lays with outdoor gardening (Not cannabis. Only on my second grow.) and as far as that goes, organic is better for the long-term viability of soil and reduces the need for fertilization, but more important than the organic/chemical debate are proper cultural practices.
Finally, someone with common sense around here. Way to acknowledge what this all means in reality.
 

sk'mo

Active Member
I see your point... Quite clearly in fact. It can be difficult to find truly sustainable methods, but sustainability is more the goal than the reality. Even for myself - I can't even start to make compost until next year and when I do, I can't use kitchen waste because I might end up with a bear in my back yard. Right now I can't really do any of the sustainable practices I've written about yet, but it's all good, I do what I can, where I can, when I can.
Everyone has their own set of circumstances. It would be unfair to expect people to do things that would be impractical in their situation or know things which they have yet to learn. Does this mean that we may inadvertently do harm? Yes. But if we as growers can produce a product that is healthier for people by looking closely at what goes into it, whether chemical or organic, haven't we done our part?

Humus Joe,

No argument here, just a discussion of ideas. I think the education part of it comes from others who read these threads and build their own thoughts on the subject and hopefully read up on the points presented. This is why I came to this site - I wanted to find out if "cannabis specific" fertilizers were actually better than say PlantProd, so I came, I lurked, I learned (and still do).

I think the lack of basic plant knowledge stems (No pun intended.) from the fact that for a lot of rookies, this is the first plant they've grown, and the hydro industry tries to imbue weed as some very unique plant unlike any other and that only their products work. This leaves new growers over-complicating something relatively easy with things like 80 part fertilizers when they ought to simply focus on the basics, like how a plant grows, or reading a book on gardening.

...How plant grows in the woods naturally is a great starting point...
My hort professor said the same thing. "Think of how it grows in nature."

I guess I'm getting off on a bit of a tangent here. I think we've come to a bit of an agreement on some points, though: The terms 'Organic' and 'chemical' have different meanings when applied to horticulture and chemistry respectively; Neither Organic or Non-Organic(?) practices can truly claim superiority to the other, as the choice to grow either way is personal, and a healthy plant can be produced by either method, which is always the goal; The terms 'organic' and 'sustainable' are not synonymous; Heavy Metals are a concern, and as growers, we ought to try and limit their presence in our buds where possible; Epsom salt may or may not be a salt:-P.

Am I right?
 

Matt Rize

Hashmaster
Chemistry, biology, botany are subjects most people I knew either slept through or just simply did poorly at.
That is what I studied. Sleeping through class... oh man... not at my school. Classes were <20 students and sleeping was way off limits.
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
I see your point... Quite clearly in fact. It can be difficult to find truly sustainable methods, but sustainability is more the goal than the reality. Even for myself - I can't even start to make compost until next year and when I do, I can't use kitchen waste because I might end up with a bear in my back yard. Right now I can't really do any of the sustainable practices I've written about yet, but it's all good, I do what I can, where I can, when I can.
Everyone has their own set of circumstances. It would be unfair to expect people to do things that would be impractical in their situation or know things which they have yet to learn. Does this mean that we may inadvertently do harm? Yes. But if we as growers can produce a product that is healthier for people by looking closely at what goes into it, whether chemical or organic, haven't we done our part?

Humus Joe,

No argument here, just a discussion of ideas. I think the education part of it comes from others who read these threads and build their own thoughts on the subject and hopefully read up on the points presented. This is why I came to this site - I wanted to find out if "cannabis specific" fertilizers were actually better than say PlantProd, so I came, I lurked, I learned (and still do).

I think the lack of basic plant knowledge stems (No pun intended.) from the fact that for a lot of rookies, this is the first plant they've grown, and the hydro industry tries to imbue weed as some very unique plant unlike any other and that only their products work. This leaves new growers over-complicating something relatively easy with things like 80 part fertilizers when they ought to simply focus on the basics, like how a plant grows, or reading a book on gardening.

My hort professor said the same thing. "Think of how it grows in nature."

I guess I'm getting off on a bit of a tangent here. I think we've come to a bit of an agreement on some points, though: The terms 'Organic' and 'chemical' have different meanings when applied to horticulture and chemistry respectively; Neither Organic or Non-Organic(?) practices can truly claim superiority to the other, as the choice to grow either way is personal, and a healthy plant can be produced by either method, which is always the goal; The terms 'organic' and 'sustainable' are not synonymous; Heavy Metals are a concern, and as growers, we ought to try and limit their presence in our buds where possible; Epsom salt may or may not be a salt:-P.

Am I right?
Great post and I'd agree with everything but that last part; Epsom salt is definitely a salt! lol!:-P
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
That is what I studied. Sleeping through class... oh man... not at my school. Classes were <20 students and sleeping was way off limits.
I went to public school and while it was a pretty good one we didn't have any crazy ass nuns with rulers smacking the sleeping student's desk, sending him through the acoustic panels on the ceiling! lol!:o It was pretty laid back for the most part and if a student wasn't interesed in his/her own education then most of the teachers, especially in the science dept., just said fuck it and focused on the ones who actually wanted to be there. :bigjoint:
 

Heisenberg

Well-Known Member
Nice discussion guys. I've learned a few things, mostly that I should have given the first post better context. I suppose the idea of organic vs other is pretty played out in this forum, which is why I was uninterested in going there. I suppose somewhere in the medical section would have been a better place to post.

As I stated in pretty much every post, I did not intend a VS thread. I just wanted potential patients who never messed with cannabis before to be informed about what organics really involve, which is essentially nothing different than non-organic in terms of safety of the final product. I suppose what I was trying to say is, you don't need to spend extra money on organic bud for the sake of your health. Do it because you like the taste, you like the philosophy, you like the experience, but not because you think it's healthier.

If I am wrong about the health issue, I am the type of person who changes my mind when presented with evidence. So far, no one has really touched on the subject.
 

Matt Rize

Hashmaster
If I am wrong about the health issue, I am the type of person who changes my mind when presented with evidence. So far, no one has really touched on the subject.
What about safety from the patient/gardener perspective? Wanna do a "whoops spilled my products all over myself" test: organic plant based tea vs synthetic gardening products.

I'll pour my AACT tea all over myself, undiluted of course. You pour your "food" on yourself, undiluted of course, and that includes pH up/down...

First one to call an ambulance looses ;)

OR, we an each chug a gallon of un-diluted solution. Mine would be, again, an AACT from plants/soil. Yours can be an undiluted mixture of your veg/flower/boosters/pH adjsuters... not sure why anyone would ever drink plant food, but kids do crazy things.
 
Top