CrackerJax
New Member
The Govt. isn't owned by anybody. You start your entire premise with a falsehood and then expand upon the fault line..... rant, rant, rant, no focus or accuracy.
out.
out.
On Wealth Redistribution(Socialism)
- Thread starter bl33b
- Start date
TheBrutalTruth
Well-Known Member
Well by that definition MedoMao, I'm sure that you have more than enough. You really don't need money to be in the stock market, and if you were conservative with your "needs" and separated them out from your wants, you could easily survive in a little single room shack, and survive by eating just basic food. Perhaps you have too many luxuries...
Give me a break...
Who cares if they need it or not, clearly they decided that it is what they wanted and they worked to get it.
Of course, the problem is that the left is jealous of the assets and belongings that these people have attained, thinking that the wealth they represent needs to be redistributed.
Capitalism guarantees unequal outcomes of wealth
Socialism guarantees equal outcomes of poverty
Besides, on top of advocating a system where everyone is equally poor, you are also advocating a system where excellence, merit and determination are not rewarded.
Screw that.
Why don't you stop worrying about their business and worry about yours?
CrackerJax
New Member
Someone else's "private" wealth is not your business. That's pretty plain huh...
out.
out.
ChChoda
Well-Known Member
Isn't that the governments business?Someone else's "private" wealth is not your business. That's pretty plain huh...
out.
TheBrutalTruth
Well-Known Member
Versus the alternative that you want which would be a mediocrity ran by the lowest common denominator I think this system worked fairly well. Until the Socialists like you decided that the rich had too much money and passed income tax laws and thus screwed the rest of the working class over.
Yep, stupid socialists and their stupid income tax, that's what has screwed this country, because those million dollar houses, while they do represent extra consumption when they are constructed they also represent extra production adding jobs to the economy that would not be there if the wealthy were just content to live in a regular hours.
The paintings that they collect and pay $5K or $10K or $100K represent more wealth moving down to the brokers, artists, auctioneers, and so on and so forth.
The very fact that you people seem to think that fixed goods represent fixed wealth is ludicrous in the extreme. The goods are not wealth, they may have value, but they are not wealth. One only needs to look at the stock market or the housing market to grasp this. Housing and Stocks Collapsed destroying the value that was stored in the market, but the cash had already changed hands. The people that entered first at lower prices got to sell at higher prices, and received the money from the people that entered after them. The money that the stock market represents has already been given to other people. All that a person does by selling is agree to a reduction in value of the asset (not that in some cases it isn't justified) but there is no wealth created or destroyed, merely transferred.
Same with the mansions, private jets, vacation homes, and so on and so forth. It takes money, time and labor to build them and in the end that money is transferred to the people providing the time and labor to build them.
To argue that they don't need those houses is the equivalent of arguing that the workers that built them don't need those jobs. It's a stupid argument that makes no fucking sense in the long run, and the only logical conclusion from your arguments is that you want a system where stupid lazy fuckers like yourself do nothing but sit on their ass all fucking day whining about how life isn't fair, because they don't want to get off their ass and MAKE SOMETHING OF THEMSELVES.
CrackerJax
New Member
Only the I.R.S.'s business. Anything else gums up the works. One need only look as far as the real estate debacle brought to you by your friendly neighborhood fed's. Now they say they can fix it for us... uh huh. Next time just get out of the way.
out.
ChChoda
Well-Known Member
Bastards! Don't forget state taxes.Only the I.R.S.'s business. Anything else gums up the works. One need only look as far as the real estate debacle brought to you by your friendly neighborhood fed's. Now they say they can fix it for us... uh huh. Next time just get out of the way.
out.
CrackerJax
New Member
Using liberal logic (oxymoron?), if everyone would just work for the Govt., there wouldn't be any unemployment 
out.
out.
ChChoda
Well-Known Member
Paradox might be the word?Using liberal logic (oxymoron?), if everyone would just work for the Govt., there wouldn't be any unemployment
out.
CrackerJax
New Member
Ever notice how ling his posts stay up without responses? 
Finally someone forges ahead despite the drivel.....
out.
Finally someone forges ahead despite the drivel.....
out.