Official 2016 Presidential Election Thread

you are wrong. thats the problem. In america fried chicken and watermelon ARE racist. Thats how stupid these bedwetting commies are.
god forbid you have them both at the same time.
And jesus if you do it in black face...
 
No that is not the problem. The problem is we let the Royalists do that to us, and then pass it on to the Fregengi, all blown out of proportion. See what I mean. I was born and raised in the Deep S. Those are are common table foods for all.

There is no connotation that I've heard. That is all the Racist North. The war was not won, up there. That was not the war.

The North won the right to keep their racism without the Consent Decrees on their States. The USA is racist only in the original 13 Colonies, down the coast to Georgia, as a matter of fact.

But, here you pass it to an International Forum as if it were fact. THAT IS THE PROBLEM.

Don't pass on the Royalist pap. Don't be part of the problem, yourself.

Let us have some proportion shall we? Population might give us a clue.

[TABLE="class: wikitable"]
[TR]
[TH]Year[/TH]
[TH]Population[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]1625[/TH]
[TD]1,980[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]1641[/TH]
[TD]50,000[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]1688[/TH]
[TD]200,000[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]1702[/TH]
[TD]270,000[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]1715[/TH]
[TD]435,000[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]1749[/TH]
[TD]1,000,000[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]1754[/TH]
[TD]1,500,000[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]1765[/TH]
[TD]2,200,000[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]1775[/TH]
[TD]2,400,000[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="class: wikitable"]
[TR]
[TH]Years[/TH]
[TH]Number[SUP][6][/SUP][/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]1620–1700[/TH]
[TD] 21,000[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]1701–1760[/TH]
[TD]189,000[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]1761–1770[/TH]
[TD] 63,000[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]1771–1780[/TH]
[TD] 15,000[/TD]
[TH]Total[/TH]
[TH]287,000[/TH]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

< 10% slaves

Total Population 31,183,582

[TD="colspan: 2"]
Total - 1860 CENSUS​
[/TD]

[TD="width: 50%, bgcolor: #000000"][/TD]

[TD="width: 50%"] Free Colored Persons [/TD]
[TD="width: 50%"] 476,748 [/TD]

[TD="width: 50%"] Total Free Population [/TD]
[TD="width: 50%"] 27,233,198 [/TD]

[TD="width: 50%"] Total Number of Slaves [/TD]
[TD="width: 50%"] 3,950,528 [/TD]

[TD="width: 50%"] Slaves as % of Population [/TD]
[TD="width: 50%"] 13% [/TD]

[TD="width: 50%"] Total Number of Families [/TD]
[TD="width: 50%"] 5,155,608 [/TD]

[TD="width: 50%"] Total Number of Slaveholders [/TD]
[TD="width: 50%"] 393,975 [/TD]

[TD="width: 50%"] % of Families Owning Slaves [/TD]
[TD="width: 50%"] 8% [/TD]


So, the North won the War, but the South killed Lincoln and nutted the VP, also with threats. So the race problem was created, not solved. The Civil was was not about race only about States Rights. And many slaves even by 1860. And as many free of it as were positioned as slaves.

Now only 13% of population and only 8% of families owned slaves. This never was a Slaver country. The horror was the South decided to secede over it for some reason. I guess they thought France would be sure to back 2 countries. They forgot I guess about the standing French - English war.


We won that war. But the politics of race were created then, not before. But, today what is the population? Still 13%.

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html

Black or African American alone, percent, 2012 (a) 13.1%

More population growth under slavery. A fact.
 
Canna Sylvan said:
I wonder if we're just slaves to our mental conditions? Autism comes from the Greek root, auto, meaning self. Hence why I'm an individualist. My hippy self is often at odds. Can I be the world's first "Republican Atheist" hippy?
Click to expand...

Sounds like a Libertarian... do you have a lot of money that you don't want taxed? What do you despise about Dems and their policies?
 
Padawanbater2 said:
In a little over 3 years, we will have a new president, since the media is already reporting on this, I thought we might as well, too.

So who would you like to see in the running? Who is simply bullshitting themselves? Who do you want to win?
Click to expand...

I would vote for a streetcar named Desire if Monsanto was the running mate.

Else, who cares? Have you not see enough of the Bait yet, to understand the Switch?
 
Moldy said:
Sounds like a Libertarian... do you have a lot of money that you don't want taxed? What do you despise about Dems and their policies?
Click to expand...


for me it's the total lack of understanding when it comes to economics and human nature. The fact that the ends justify the means, lack of integrity and history of racism are also reasons to despise.

I despise the religious right/ moral majority too. Anyone who feels I should live by THEIR rules, when what I do affects no one else, gets on my list. I'm an equal opportunity hater.
 
Moldy said:
Sounds like a Libertarian... do you have a lot of money that you don't want taxed? What do you despise about Dems and their policies?
Click to expand...

Libertarians for Life aren't considered "real" Libertarians. Obama is for partial birth, which is flat out 100% murder.
 
Canna Sylvan said:
You're so Democrat, you want everyone monitored. That's so awesome.
Click to expand...

no, i'm simply not so naive that i think the most powerful intelligence apparatus in the world is gonna be left to collect cobwebs.

now cue echelon to come blather something about drones.
 
UncleBuck said:
no, i'm simply not so naive that i think the most powerful intelligence apparatus in the world is gonna be left to collect cobwebs.

now cue echelon to come blather something about drones.
Click to expand...

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Which part of that are you against? Surveillance and spying are forms of searches and seizures.
 
Canna Sylvan said:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Which part of that are you against? Surveillance and spying are forms of searches and seizures.
Click to expand...

checking the numbers i've called against known terrorist numbers does not seem unreasonable.
 
echelon1k1 said:
is that all you think is being done? cool story bro...
Click to expand...

their plan to bust drug dealers or whatever it is that nonthinkist was crying about the other day is a joke, there's a better chance of being struck by lightning than getting busted for growing pot here.

now go ahead and mouth fart an acronym salad to impress us all with your big brain.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top