This is what I wrote:
...As many of you may already know, the lawsuit compassion first vs. AZ was settled in court on January 16th, 2012. Dispensaries will open soon.
There is one part of the law that we all share in common as patients and caregivers…the infamous DHS 25 mile rule for having your own cultivation and providing yourself with medication. Many disabled patients, low income patients, etc. will be an unable to afford the inflated costs of the medication from dispensaries, and forcing them to seek it elsewhere. According to the suit filed by compassion first, that 25 mile rule MAY bare some merit for another lawsuit to have this overturned as well. I spoke with an attorney involved in the compassion first suit, and they eluded that it was a conflict of interest for them to handle the case. They said their clients are happy with the 25 mile rule. OF COURSE THEY ARE!
Under Arizona constitution, its equal privileges and immunities clause similarly mandates that: "No law shall be enacted granting...PRIVILAGES or immunities which, upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citizens or corporations." Arizona constitution, Article 2-13.
Not sure, but it sounds like if a dispensary sets up shop within a 25 mile distance of you, patients and caregivers will then be denied the PRIVILAGE to grow their own meds. Instead the PRIVILAGES to cultivate will be given to a dispensary and force patients/caregivers to buy at whatever cost, if they want their meds. This doesn't sound "equal" to me.
Anyone well versed in constitutional law and the DHS regs, pls let me know if this may have merit. Thanks