Of course they don't . They'd rather irradiate because it's a "proven method", and they have no studies on such things to guide them while they fly by the seat of their pants. One of them even shipped without a seal in place, and I don't think they all vacuum pack either. Long live pseudo standards..
I tend to doubt that the mold becomes problematic while it sits in storage or goes through shipping. I'm thinking it's a problem already and they're reliant upon some game of russian roulette testing while playing pass/go. They cut off their "controlled environments" by the time they cut the plant down. PNP had their recall because their vault is a bank safe and banks haven't had a need to refrigerate money.
It's quite simple, as with any perishable good, when we produce our own at home, it stays in the refrigerator until it lands in our papers. This preserves the terpenes. We don't leave it in a 150g bag on the table for a month, or a day, and ship it across the country in the back of hot vans. I'd refuse anything that went through that automatically and just out of common sense.
Fact is they really shouldn't be shipping it through standard mail or vending machines. It ought to be kept refrigerated, or in fact frozen. It'd be a hell of a lot better than milled and irradiated. But they're just a bunch of johnny come late-lies with their heads up their assholes sure in the fact that their shit don't stink.
Anyway, there are also such things as "oxygen scavengers", which are little packets of iron and salt that rust. You also see those in beef jerky bags and MRE's. MRE's can last 4 to 6 years but they're not generally regarded for their explosive flavor. Their marketing says the science is in and those rust packs help keep them fresher/better tasting.
Oxygen, and its exposure to it, is known to be one of the prime factors in the degradation of THC. Heat and Light being the others. Right now it's plain to that their procedures demonstrate a perfect ignorance of that, perhaps by will in some cases and in others not.
It would be tremendously interesting if random samples from customers, for each LP, and I think by requirement every single returned and refused sample from customers, were tested after enduring that round trip, which must all be seen as a part of their process.
Their manufacturing process and responsibilities towards their clients don't end when they throw it in the back of a van, but their quality control certainly does. Peace naturals claims to be withholding samples for longer term testing to better assess its condition overtime. They kept it in a hot vault and it went bad/had a recall. Now they said the problem was what? That the vault was hot, and now they'll be refrigerating that vault to ensure the viability of their samples long term.
Think about that. That's their control for the crap that they're sending you, and they're not treating it to the same conditions as the crap that they're sending you, because if they did, it would fucking fail, and they'd have another recall. But what about the crap that they're sending you??? It's cool, they say, because you probably smoked it anyway?? Holy fuck! I repeat, Holy Fuck!! "It's a good will thing. We're really just doing this for ourselves". Hollly ffffuck! And their so called control then becomes a biased, unrepresentative, and irrelevant sample. Stop letting them confuse such samples as "standards". The only real standard is whether or not it's something you'll use or not, but this program flips that around on you. Here's your dinner, bitch. Eat it.
Now, I'm sure they'll chime in, if this argument picks up steam to the extent that they can't ignore it, and declare that they do test returned products and pretend like it answers the first challenge too. So I'll be really clear. What I'm saying they need to do is to have a third party place mock orders where they get the packet and take it right to testing facilities and see how it compares to what they said was on the label from the batch. They can sample the whole damn batch that way and verify the accuracy of the marketing label, as well as consistency over time, including the worst case conditions of clear across the country in the hottest weather possible, and even with the full variety of potential couriers that they may normally use.
If it's being degraded in shipping, as I'm damn sure it is, then guess what? It's an unreliable and inconsistent product that doesn't meet any significant "standards". Let's stop dancing around it and call it the crap it is. This is how you can prove it.
BTW, come to think of it, what the MMPR appears to be lacking are clear provisions for punitive measures for when they fail the requirements of their licensing as LPs. Where is the accountability? Clearly we haven't seen any yet.