ttystikk
Well-Known Member
No, that doesn't follow.
My thoughts on the 2016 US presidential election
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
The NEW Republican; SAY you're for the environment, but for damn sure DON'T ACT on it!
BWAHAHAHA!
Who let you out of forth grade? Cuz, you are NOT smart enough to be a fifth grader!
StillNotGOP
Well-Known Member
Trump says that on day one China will be declared a currency manipulator.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
No, science sold me that reality through empirical evidence and scientific consensus..
I'm sure you don't want dirty air and water, but guess what, that's what you're going to get when president Trump eliminates the EPA and the FDA. You hate regulations now, but wait until your family starts eating suspect fish and drinking contaminated water like the Americans in Flint.
"Just stop it with all that global warming stuff."
"Just stop observing reality."
StillNotGOP
Well-Known Member
Republicans care about the environment. That's why we created the EPA in 1970 while Democrats were lynching blacks in the south. Earth has experienced much hotter temperatures than what we have been seeing. All of the empirical data and models have been debunked. Man made global warming does not exist.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
If that's the best you can manage in rebuttal, I rest my case.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Pseudo science [EDIT: AND revisionist history!] running apeshit. Pleeeeeeeese shut up, you've got every last thing wrong!
The worst part is that you're too wrapped up in your silly little world that you never think to wonder why someone might have filled you THAT full of bullshit.
Meanwhile, the rest of us are following the money.
Genius.
Last edited:
londonfog
Well-Known Member
We will soon have a SCOTUS that will lean heavy right. The court can revisit and say it is very much constitutional. Trump is very much for stop and frisk as is Rudy Giuliani and Chris Christie...to think one of them may very well be our new Attorney General.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Then why do republicans support abolishing the EPA?
Agreed, but none, ever, because of the kinds of increases in manmade carbon dioxide that we see today
No, actually all of the scientifically corroborated models they follow today are accurate within a few percentages, on account of going by the verifiable data, since that's exactly how science works
President Trump, the leader of your party, on the EPA @1:30:
doublejj
Well-Known Member
this would be bad for recreational pot...
heckler73
Well-Known Member
The simple answer is "no".
Do you know what the price of steel was 10 years ago?
londonfog
Well-Known Member
It sure would, amongst various other things...but Hooray Trump won. fucking idiots
Justin-case
Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
No idea
Justin-case
Well-Known Member
heckler73
Well-Known Member
It was more. I happened to be a manager at that time and had to arrange purchases of said product in YUUUUGE quantity. I saw steel rise 3x in a year! Yet, that didn't stop us. Labour always costs more, regardless.
You (i.e. America) have a good $1/ft for structural to go before that becomes an issue in the grand scheme. If Americans reopen those foundries and start pumping it out again, the economy will be more than happy.
I, for one, would be glad to see America become exceptionalist again in that regard. It would mean higher quality product. You, I presume, have not a firm grasp of that metric, yet.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
It was more. I happened to be a manager at that time and had to arrange purchases of said product in YUUUUGE quantity. I saw steel rise 3x in a year! Yet, that didn't stop us. Labour always costs more, regardless.
You (i.e. America) have a good $1/ft for structural to go before that becomes an issue in the grand scheme. If Americans reopen those foundries and start pumping it out again, the economy will be more than happy.
I, for one, would be glad to see America become exceptionalist again in that regard. It would mean higher quality product. You, I presume, have not a firm grasp of that metric, yet.
