Methodical, scientific approach to nutrients and nutrient formulations discussion

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
Uncle Ben, my plants have seen a complete turn around since I switched ferts to a complete nutrient. I have plants a couple weeks into flower in hempy, in soil and in straight hydro. They are all being fed Foliage Pro supplemented with a low dose of cal-mag (I use RO, my tap water is near 400 ppm) and now I'm introducing some FF soluble bloom booster which is 0-50-30 at 1/2 strength. Do you think that's a mistake? You've said you've gone all the way through flowering with nothing but Foliage Pro. My foliage is fantastic, no yellowing, no leaf drop, no spotting, my plants look like a fashion shoot compared to my previous efforts. But I would like to see more aggressive bud development than I have so far. I've got lots of clusters of flowers but I've seen faster bulking up in past grows. Is N suppressing flowering? A visit to my journal would be most welcome.:mrgreen:
If your leaves are holding green (your avatar doesn't suggest it on that platn) then continue doing what you're doing. Since I don't know what the NPK values of your salts are, I can't judge on whether it is too much N or what. Could be the genetics, low temps....
 

shnkrmn

Well-Known Member
If your leaves are holding green (your avatar doesn't suggest it on that platn) then continue doing what you're doing. Since I don't know what the NPK values of your salts are, I can't judge on whether it is too much N or what. Could be the genetics, low temps....

Noooo, not the plant in my avatar. That was grown in 2008 with Fox Farm. These are most of my current plants. They are on Foliage Pro (I believe you know these values :mrgreen:) and cal-mag.



 

bran1981

Well-Known Member
It happens to everybody. Why? Because folks don't take care of the leaves, instead relying on the bloom foods hype which induce leaf drop. If I had to guess, you switched to a low N food about the first - second week after flipping the 12/12 switch. Did you not?

BTW, see my (green) sig line. ;)

UB
I switched to Botanicare pro bloom that has a npk of 2.5-2-5 and calmag with ro water with a ph of 5.8 to 6.0 I have never had any issue with the leaves not staying green tho. My lights come on in an hour, I will take a pic.
 

bran1981

Well-Known Member
I switched to Botanicare pro bloom that has a npk of 2.5-2-5 and calmag with ro water with a ph of 5.8 to 6.0 I have never had any issue with the leaves not staying green tho. My lights come on in an hour, I will take a pic.
A little more info: room temp is 75 to 78 and water temp is at 65 now but it was in the fifties before yesterday. Also have been keeping the ppm at about 1,000 but just brought it down to about 800 to seeing a little burn showing up.
The plants in the first pic. aren't doing to bad but the plant in the second pic. looks like crap and they are from the same mother and on the same table. The third pic. is to show how green they all are and they are in there 6th week so far out off about 9 to 10 week plants. Another thing I have noticed is that my leaves seem to acually get greener in flower than they where in veg, but a lot darker green.
 

Attachments

GrowingfortheGold

New Member
Question: If I were to leave my dosage of foliage-pro in a cup and left it out for a couple days, the chlorine would evaporate? ...and I could use Beneficial Bacteria?
 

fatman7574

New Member
Fatman, you can make this as confusing as you wish. Me thinks there's enough of that to go around these parts with all the 2-3 part and supplements biz.

Upon inspection of foods designed for soil, you'll find about 8-10 elements no matter the brand. For an inert medium it should be 15-16, taking into account your water source.

Yes, a hydro food can be used in soil, all depends on the soil's short and long term charge, plant needs, leaching practices, etc. The following is an example of me using Dyna-Gro exclusively on soil, whereby the soil's nutrient charge was gone. This was only an experimental plant which was later destroyed, but that's beside my point. Notice the tiny, first juvenile leaves still attached to the lower part of the plant? That means I have my nutrition ditty spot on.






I gave you a link to Dyna-Gro. Look at their foods, they are one part and the application amounts are simply given, around 1/2 tsp/gallon.

UB
Ben when your wrong your wrong. Now your back tracking and trying to change your tune. You need to go back and read the Dyna-Gro literature and give up on your rigidness on the defining of soil or hydroponic fertilizers. If you want to judge what a fertilizer is principally designed for ie inert grows hydroponic in a non organic soil or a media containing organic matter ie Humus, peat, compost etc, just look at the nitrogen types and ratios. I explained that fully. I am sure others will benefit by it whether you ck choose to r or not. To put it very simple for you Ben if it contains any urea it is only for soil. If it contains more than 15% of its nitrogen as ammonical nitrogen it is not designed exclusively for hydroponics in inert medias but is an attempt to produce both a nutrient for nutrient depleted soil grows and hydroponic. It is a very, very widely spread fact in the hydroponic industry that that inert media non humus or organic media hydroponic nutrients should NOT have over 15% of its nitrogen supplied as ammonical nitrogen. PERIOD. That is how you are supposed to determine what the nutrient are formulated for, not by counting how many elements are in the formulation. That is simply ludicrous.

As far as your continued soil formulations have 8-10 elements and inert 15-16. Dyna-Gro themselves explain why their preparations have all the elements as supplied by hydroponic formulas. Because many soils are nearly inert. The way the agricultural industry is going it will not be much longer before the vast majority of the commercial agricultural soils will soon be inert. The commercial agricultural industry is already spraying secondary nutrients and trace nutrients in huge quantities now because their is too little tilth to the soil to to contain the humus to provide storage of those those nutrients through out a full growing season. Times are a changing Ben.

It is in plain english in the posting you yourself put up wrongly believing it supports your 8-10 versus 15-16 out dated opinion. There are many, many soluble fertilizers on the market made exclusivly for soil that have 12 to 13 and even many with 15 elements Ben. I think your a bit dated on fertilizers now being formulated and are too buzy looking at fertilizers being as they have been for decades. The majority of the fertilizer manafacturer are behind the curve in their formulations.
 

fatman7574

New Member
Question: If I were to leave my dosage of foliage-pro in a cup and left it out for a couple days, the chlorine would evaporate? ...and I could use Beneficial Bacteria?
Dilute it with some water your going to put it in any way and it will dissipate over night.

Or dilute it and use an airstone an most if not all wil be gone in 4 to 6 hours.
 
This is the most confusing thread to me , sorry I just don't want to mix my own nute mix ....

please recommend some products and discuss there use with different water types (RO /Tap) and perhaps some

discussion on concentration used in different stages of plant growth ....

I have read most of the links that have been posted , but could you simplify ....

I have collected some posts from Al B. and Heath Robinson and would like your comments....

Thanks U B I've been trying to locate a source for Dyna-Grow F Pro but after FatMans posts I'm confused ...

Here are the posts, thanks in advance O. F. D.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Heath Robinson....

https://www.rollitup.org/hydroponics-aeroponics/149998-heaths-flooded-tube-vertical-54.html#post3053154

I will go into detail about nutrient concentrations because it seems to be an area which a lot of growers don't fully understand.

I have seen quite a lot of bad advice from experienced growers who advise to "increase the nutrient concentrations until you see tip burn and then back off slightly" I will try explain why this is bad advice.

Nutrient salts can cause harm to plants if they are in high enough concentration in water or soil. This effect is mainly indirect by pulling moisture out of roots and reducing the uptake of water and nutrients to affected plants. This is the cause of tip and edge burn of leaves, if the nutrient concentration was maintained, slow growth, nutrient deficiencies, wilting and eventual death of the plant would occur if the problem is not corrected.

This is the reason why, Water movement in plants is a factor of osmotic pressure and capillary action. Osmotic pressure is defined as water flowing through a permeable membrane in the direction of higher salt concentrations. Water will continue to flow in the direction of the highest salt concentration until the salts have been diluted to the point that the concentrations on both sides of the membrane are equal.

A good example of this is pouring salt on a slug or snail, the salt concentration outside the slug is highest, which causes the water from inside the slug's body to cross the skin membrane. The slug becomes dehydrated and dies.
For osmosis to occur, water must move from a more dilute (the nutrient solution) to a more concentrated compartment (the plant). If you were to water your plant with sea water the plant would wither and die as the salt water now extracts water from the plant instead of replenishing it. So basically high levels of salinity will lead to high concentrations of salt in the plant tissues which will severely damage metabolic processes.

here is a grow chart which will help explain why there is no advantage to feeding your plants high nutrient concentrations.

notice on the chart that there is a deficient zone where the plant is not meeting its needs and growth is poor. A low zone where the plant is growing but lacks all the necessary nutrients to sustain good growth and yield.

Now the important part, you will notice if you look at the sufficient and high zones that there is no advantage to feeding your plants at higher concentrations than is needed. Notice also that growth and yield suffers sharply once the plant is over fertilised. If you feed your plant until it is toxic and showing signs of tip burn and you back off slightly you are still in the excess zone and your yields will suffer to some degree.

I have found that the sufficient zone for marijuana is in the range from an Ec of 1.0 to 1.6 I personally run in at an EC of approx 1.2 and never exceed 1.4

I hope that helps explain why I do what I do.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Al B. Fuct says

(https://www.rollitup.org/hydroponics-aeroponics/198817-nutrient-question.html)

I use Canna 2-part nutrients. My standard mix is 375ml "part A" and 375ml "part B" in a 100L reservoir. Should yield a tank at 1300-1500ppm depending upon residual mineral salt content of the make-up water.

Fertiliser composition is represented by a three figure expression like 10-10-10, 5-10-5, etc. The figures represent the ratios of the principal elemental nutrients N (nitrogen), P (phosphorus) & K (potassium) to one another.

Cannabis prefers a high ratio of N to P & K for vegging, i.e. 20-10-10, 10-5-5, etc. In both examples, N exists in twice the amount compared to P & K. 20-10-10 would have twice as much N, P & K as 10-5-5.

For flowering, cannabis needs a high P nutrient such as 10-20-10, 5-10-5, etc. Note that the figure for P is greater than those for N & K.

Avoid extremely high P nutes like 10-50-10 (African violet food). There's too much P for the N & K and this has been known to cause what looks like an N deficiency in cannabis. You can use P based 'bloom boosters' (such as Canna PK-13-14) in late flower (week 6 of flowering, use for 1 week only), but stick with a more moderate P ratio for weeks 1-5 and 7-8. You may want to stop using nutes altogether in flowering weeks 7-8. The plants will store right on 2 weeks worth of nutes anyway.

I'm not sure of any established optimal NPK for flowering, but I do know that 10-50-10 African violet food has given many ppl grief. I'd stick to a 1:2:1 ratio, i.e. 5-10-5, 10-20-10 or thereabouts for flowering. Some ppl use P & K based 'bloom boosters' (such as Canna PK-13-14 and imitators) for 1 wk only in week 6 of flowering, which in addition to usual flowering nutes, can yield a very high P number. You can P burn badly with P boosters, so start with 1/4 the mfr recommended dosing and use it for only 1 week in wk 6.

I've recently rebuilt my op with 125L tanks for each of my 820mm square flood trays, each which hold 23 plants. It previously had 100L tanks. These days, with the bigger tanks, ppm stays constant all the way to the minimum water level, which is whatever it takes to fill the flood tray to the overflow and still keep the pump submerged.

With the smaller tanks, as water level dropped, the ppm would rise slightly each day. I mix for 1400ppm; by day 4-5, the tanks would bump up as high as ~1500-1600ppm with about 70% of tank volume remaining. Adding water of course dropped the ppm back to 1400. However, filling the tank to the top would yield often as low as 900ppm, the difference between 1400 and 900 being what the plants had eaten. In this case, the plants were using a certain percentage of the water faster than the percentage of the nutes. I stop adding water when the meter says ~1100ppm.

The larger tanks stay right on 1400 as water level drops. The volume of water is apparently better matched to the nutrient consumption rate. If I refill with water, the ppm will drop, by a somewhat lesser amount than with the smaller tanks.

I'm happier with the consistent 1400 and am learning to live with looking at a half-empty tank- if there's enough to keep the pump submerged on flood, all is well. I'm resisting the urge to top tanks for the entire 2 weeks if possible. If air temps are warm, evaporation increases, forcing me to add some water, but I don't totally refill the tanks.
 

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
....To put it very simple for you Ben if it contains any urea it is only for soil.
Well, duh....and Dyna-Gro does not add urea to their formulations. http://www.dyna-gro.com/Website%20pdf%20Files/competitive_analysis.pdf
FYI, which I've repeated dozens of times in posts, it takes microbial action to change the urea into a nitrate form. Having said that, urea is often used a a N source in fertilizers for foliar applications. I like urea sources because it does a couple of things for me relative to my water quality - it drops my pH and is slow release. If doing large applications, I use UAN or Urea/Ammonium Nitrate.

If it contains more than 15% of its nitrogen as ammonical nitrogen it is not designed exclusively for hydroponics in inert medias but is an attempt to produce both a nutrient for nutrient depleted soil grows and hydroponic.
What's your point? Sounds like a solution for both hydro and/or soil.

Ammonium phosphate, an ammoniacal source of N, is often included in hydroponic foods, witness GH.

It is a very, very widely spread fact in the hydroponic industry that that inert media non humus or organic media hydroponic nutrients should NOT have over 15% of its nitrogen supplied as ammonical nitrogen. PERIOD.
The question is, is it a matter of efficiency or the health of the plant if the hydroponic food contains more than your magical 15% of ammoniacal N? We all know that the nitrate form is readily absorbed, that's not the issue. My question is what happens to the ammoniacal form of N when applied to the root zone? Is it broken down into NH3 and phosphate ions and uptaked.....what happens?

That is how you are supposed to determine what the nutrient are formulated for, not by counting how many elements are in the formulation. That is simply ludicrous.
May be ludicrous to you, but not to the pros. Most plants requires the 15-16 elements, that's all I'm saying. Argue it with a Dyna-Gro tech or Cornell University.

As far as your continued soil formulations have 8-10 elements and inert 15-16. Dyna-Gro themselves explain why their preparations have all the elements as supplied by hydroponic formulas. Because many soils are nearly inert. The way the agricultural industry is going it will not be much longer before the vast majority of the commercial agricultural soils will soon be inert. The commercial agricultural industry is already spraying secondary nutrients and trace nutrients in huge quantities now because their is too little tilth to the soil to to contain the humus to provide storage of those those nutrients through out a full growing season. Times are a changing Ben.
Peat sources may dwindle, but a bag of typical potting soil contains alot of humus, in some form or fashion. I don't think that is gonna change anytime soon. Folks like Schultz use a slow release food called Polyon, a product I buy in large quantities.

There are many, many soluble fertilizers on the market made exclusivly for soil that have 12 to 13 and even many with 15 elements Ben.
And who may they be?

This is the most confusing thread to me , sorry I just don't want to mix my own nute mix ....
Yep, quite useless for the everyday stoner that just wants to open a bottle and plop a dollop of this and that into his root medium.

If you really want to get anal about all this (without all the confusion), which is the direction this thread is taking, then you start with a water analysis and try to understand how it inter-relates with fertilizers and plant requirements. I have not found anything more concise than this series on water quality and plant nutrition. Take an hour and read these PDF files backwards and forwards and you'll be light years ahead of Johnny Potseed. I didn't take the chance they might go down, I printed them out. ;)
http://www.staugorchidsociety.org/culturewater.htm

Also, guys like Heath mean well and are doing a fine job, but he is not giving you all the caveats on such issues as E.C. and how they inter-relate to other factors. You need to look at your alkalinity index, EC, TDS, waste ions, etc. Again, this explains it well: http://www.staugorchidsociety.org/PDF/IPAWaterQuality.pdf

UB
 
Thanks Ben .....

I'm getting a water analysis ....

Will Up Date ....

Downloaded those PFD's you recommended ...

I had read them ..

They are about media culture ...

I'm growing in Hydroton ....

A lot of us are just ,incredibly awesome , everyday stoners ......

I'm not going for a degree here ....

I Just want the best ......

I can do with what I have .....
 

fatman7574

New Member
Well, duh....and Dyna-Gro does not add urea to their formulations. I never said they did Ben. Quit trying to side track by starting new arguments. http://www.dyna-gro.com/Website pdf Files/competitive_analysis.pdf
FYI, which I've repeated dozens of times in posts, it takes microbial action to change the urea into a nitrate form.

Wooh there fellow. Ask 100 people what microbial cation means and those few who do not say I do not know will likely say bacteria action. The term is not even a accepted scientific term as it is so braod and meaningless sa to be unusable. Here is a coomon definition: "A minute life form; a microorganism, especially a bacterium that causes disease. Not in technical use." An enzyze is microscopic to say the least. I really doubt that you even know how urea is broken down. You likely just read that it takes microbial action and you left your knowledge base at that low a level.

More specifically:

It takes water and urease to turn urea to nitrate not bacteria. Urease is an enzyme not a bacteria. It is not present in water, air or chemical nutrients. It is present in soil, animal and human intestines and is also present in some plants. I have not read of it being present in MJ plants.

Urea to Ammonia (ammonification):
NH2-CO-NH2 + H2O with the action of uerase enzymes goes to NH3 + NH2-COOH which goes to NH3 + CO2. NH3 is ammonia gas not Nitrate. (NO3)

The ammonium ion (NH4+) can be broken down by bacteria (Nitrosomonas) to form nitrite (NO2), which is then broken down by another type of bacteria (Nitrobacter) to form nitrate (NO3). This conversion of ammonia to nitrate and nitrite is called "nitrification."

Ammonium nitrate to nitrite:
2NH2 + 2O2 + 2NO2 Goes T0 2NO2- + 4H+ + 2H2O
Nitrite to nitrate:
2NO2 + O2 Goes TO 2NO3-
Having said that, and being wrong urea is often used a a N source in fertilizers for foliar applications. Urea is occasionally used as a nitrogen source for foliar applications. It might even be usable on Pot? I like urea sources because it does a couple of things for me relative to my water quality - it drops my pH and is slow release.

It is true a long-range effect of all ammonium based nitrogen fertilizers is to lower soil pH. Urea, diammonium phosphate, and nitrogen solutions, when first applied, greatly but temporarily increase soil pH in the zone of application. Ammonia is released and can “burn” germinating seeds or seedling roots in the area of fertilizer placement. In the eventual conversion of NH4+ to NO3-, however, an acid residue is formed and thereby the long range effect is a lowering of pH as the alkalinity buffers are used up and can no longer maintain the pH.

Regular urea is not slow release, per say, as in moist soil media at a temperature above 60 degrees F it takes only about three to five days for the complete conversion of urea to ammonium. Perhaops you consider 5 days slow release in soil. Most people would no consider 5 days in soil slow release.

There are slow release UREA sold though:
· Urea-formaldehyde (UF) (38-0-0). Released by microbial degradation.
· Isobutylidene diurea (IBDU) (31-0-0). Released by soil moisture and particle size.
· Sulfur coated urea (SCU) (36-0-0). Release rate controlled by coating thickness.
· Plastic coated fertilizers (various formulations). Release dependent on temperature and coating thickness.

If doing large applications, I use UAN or Urea/Ammonium Nitrate.
I am sure tha will work fine in most soils but it has nothing to do with the majority of inert soil less grower's needs.

So it takes bacteria to covert NH4 (ammonia) to nitrite and then nitrate. So you use a mixture of nitrogen sources in your soil grows. Ok, that means the Dyna-Gro products are fine for soil, more so than inert media (soil less) hydro and aquaculture. There has been no disagreement about what works in soil. I am concerned more with formulations for inert media hydroponicsand DWC/Bubbleponics as are the majority of MJ growers.

Urea is not used in those formulations and it is very well known by expereienced inert medo ia soil less hydro growers that levels of ammonium need to be maintained in their nutrients. at levels below those used in most soil nutrient formulations. That should not be considered arguble.

So please quit avoiding your blunders and antiquated baseless opinions by talking about what works in soil. The issue is that the high levels of ammonium nitrogen in Dyna_pro nutrients cause problems in inert (soil free) hydroponc systems. PERIOD. I have no doubt that Flora-Bloom and the other soluble Dyna-Gro formulations work well in soil. I am arguing that they work better with less problems in soil beacause the ammonical level is not that great an issue with soil grows where dolomitic lime is typically present and where the bacterias need to convert it to nitrite and nitarte are usually very abundant.

So you do not half to spell it out and add more confusion here is the speal on ammonium in soils. applications:

Ammonium nitrogen (NH4+) carries a positive charge and is adsorbed onto soil particles. In this chemical form, leaching of nitrogen does not occur; however, NH4+ is changed to the NO3- form by bacteria. This process occurs rapidly (beginning within 2 to 3 days) as the soil temperature climbs above 50°F. Complete conversion from NH4+ to NO3- occurs within about a month of application.

This implies that Ammonium nitrogen is a slow release fertilizer in soils not urea. This is another indicator that Dtyna-Gro fertilizer regardless of it containinf 12 to 15 elements is seesntially DESIGNED FOR SOILS but may be used in hydro if you are qilling to deal with the adverse sise effects of all the ammonium nitrogen.. Period. Put that all in your pipe and smke it Ben. Please try to learn from this and not repeta the same ludicrous statements and mistakes and side tracks again.

In regard to bacteria conversion of amminical nitrogen for use in inert media (soil free)hydroponics consider the ammonical nitrogen is typically very slow to be converted to nitrite then nitrate and usually it takes at least five weeks for the changes to take place. This is due to chemical hydroponic nutrients not having the nitrosomonas and nitrobacter solutions present when initialy mixed from a cocentrate and RO or even tap water if it has been chloronated. (Dyna-Gro even insures those bacteria are notpresent in their fo nutrients a by adding chlorine to there formulations. Go figure! Another indicator ithey are soil preferential formulations.

Then for the people who regularly use chlorine or H2O2 the bacteria is never going to be present at large enough levels to make anything but negligible conversions. It also means for those who change their reservoir(s) at least once every two to three or even four weeks the conversion to nitrate is negligible.

This means when the ammonical nitrogen is taken up by the roots (during low light seedling conditions and during budding) the roots will dump every day a bunch of H+ ions. As nearly no hydroponic formulations supply enough alkalinity (buffers) to handle this amount of H+ (acid) the nutrient pH drops substantially daily.

It is a simpy fact that 3 pounds of lime to counter the acids from a pound of urea or ammonium nitrogen. Does tha give you any idea what will be needed to neutralize the acids in a hydroponic reservoir. Yepper 3 ppm of carbonate alkalinity per each ppm of ammonium nitrogen. So considering Dynagrow uses at laest about 1/3 ammonium nitrogen that means the carbonate level (alkalinity) would have to be equal to the total nitrogen and that is for there formulas with low percentages of ammonium nitrogen. Hydrponoic systems don't have dolomitic lime present as most soil grows do. Once again this means the Dyna-Gro fertilizers are formulated more for soil than for inert media hydroponics or aquaponics such as DWC and bubbleponics, NTF etc. PERIOD.

I am not saying Dyna-Gro is exclusively for soils, just that it is obviously better suited for soils than inert hydro and aqua culture so quit with your ludicarous baseless arguing and side tracking about your soil grows.


What's your point? Sounds like a solution for both hydro and/or soil.

Dooh, that's is what I have been saying, but you first started saying no it is hydroponic. Then you back tracked and said well it is hydroponic but it can akso be used on soil. Now you have finally said sorta it is both. If that is the case you out dated opinion about defining the difference between soil and hydro is the number of elements is now out the door also. Hopefully you now see that was a ludicrous argument right from the start.

Ammonium phosphate, an ammoniacal source of N, is often included in hydroponic foods, witness GH.

No it is not often used. It is seldom used in that fashion unless for some of fthe wall raeason a manfacturer wants to formulate a fertilizer high in phosphorus but not high in potash.

Ben they simply do that as a cheap way or raising the pkphorus without also raising the potash, as the only other cheap way is to use phosphoric acid. That would just lower the pH immdial telly instaed of later when the ammonaical nitrogen is taken up and HT+ ions are realsed by the roots.

The typical way to set the phosphorus level is to use MonoPotassium phosphate. However it is 21% Phophorus and 25% Pottasium. If they want to raise the Phosphorus and not the Potassium they add a bit of Mmmonium Phosphate but it is never used as a main source of Phosphorus as as too much ammonium would be added.

Look at the percentage of ammonium nitrogen in realtion to the total nitrogen Ben. You will not find an inert media (soil free) chemically based hydroponic formulation from GH or AN with anywhere near 15% yet alone over 15%.

The question is, is it a matter of efficiency or the health of the plant if the hydroponic food contains more than your magical 15% of ammoniacal N? Yes, It is Ben. We all know that the nitrate form is readily absorbed, that's not the issue. My question is what happens to the ammoniacal form of N when applied to the root zone?

Is it broken down into NH3 and phosphate ions and uptaked.....what happens? Your wrong again Ben.

Ben you are loosing it again by trying to jump ahead and by trying to ignore the simple chemistry of the nitrogen cycle and plant nitrogen uptake. It is now even obvious you do not even know what ammoniums formulas is yet alone the formula for ammonium phospahe. AmmoniumPhosphate is (NH4)3PO4 How did you come to believe this would produce NH3 ammonia gas again by adding it to water? Ok by adding urea to soil that has natural enzymes you can get ammonia gas. Adding it to soil you will get NH4 iand in about five weeks it will all be converted to Nitrate NO3 and the phophorus will become available. In a water reservoir that was was covered above and I would not suggest any growers hold his breath waiting for a conversion to either NO3 (nitrate) or to NH3 which will never happen.




May be ludicrous to you, but not to the pros. What are you changing subject to and ranting about now Ben. every time you get shown to be totally wrong you drean up a new argument or tray a diversion of some sort.

Most plants requires the 15-16 elements, that's all I'm saying.

No that is what I have been saying all along. Your argument has been that soil formulations do not need all 15-16 nutrients so therefore the Dyna-Gro nutrients are hydroponic but may be used with soil. You have gone from soil needs nothing but 8 or so nutrients as it already contains everything else already saying yes soil can be stripped so it can use the other nutrients (as I pointed out is what Dyna-Gro was saying in its add)to a totally new diversional argument that all plants need 15-16 elements nutrients. Argue it with a Dyna-Gro tech or Cornell University. Ben I have said that all along. Don't go getting silly in trying to divert things again.

Are you developing aAlsheimers or something. What I have said is ludicrous is your classifying whether a plants nutrient formulation is a soil formulation or a hydroponic formulation on how many elements is in its formulation.. That iopinion of your is what is is ludicrous

Peat sources may dwindle, but a bag of typical potting soil contains alot of humus, in some form or fashion.

Actually your pretty much wrong again. Humus is that portion of the soil that has fully broken down and is thus stable. It is the amorphous, ordinarily dark-colored, colloidal matter in soil, representing a complex of the fractions of organic matter of plant, animal, and microbial origin that are most resistant to decomposition. Humus is the organic, non-cellular, long-lasting component of soil. Meaning that any organic matter has reached its final state of decomposition. Nothing like compost or peat moss.

Compost is organic matter in a purposeful state of partial of decomposition. I provides nutrients and improves the texture of soil so that it breaths better. It contains small amounts of humus at best.

Peat moss does not contain nutrients but it absorbs nutrients both already existing in the soil and those added by you. The cell structure of sphagnum peat moss is large so it can absorb extra air and nutrients like a wick or sponge. By absorbing these important nutrients, peat moss then releases them over time as your plants need them. Otherwise, what happens is that important nutrients are lost through a leaching process and you’ll have to fertilize more or have plants that are not as healthy as they could be.

Humus and peat moss are nothing alike at all.

Peat moss pretty much does nothing put hold water and store nutrients. Peats mosses stable form makes it difficult to break down by microorganisms. If humic compounds had N or P, micro-oragnisms would try harder to attack them, but since they don't, they aren't worth the effort. Humus is non-cellular because everything else in the cell breaks down and gets recycled into other organisms, leaving the humus in the soil but no longer within a cell. ie fully digested. The term "humus" gets tossed around loosely by gardeners to mean the organic material that makes soil brownish, not all of which is humus. In nature, humus accumulates in soil because it lasts for hundreds or thousands of years."One more important attribute of humus should be listed, in addition to improving soil structure (or texture) and water retention. Humus has a high cation exchange capacity, which means it acts as a veritable storehouse for plant nutrients.

Idon't think that is gonna change anytime soon. Ben besides being wrong about implying humus and, peat moss and compost at are much alike is more evidence of your talking nonsence to try to avoid the real arguements you have lost due to a lack of knowledge and off beat opinions. Either that or your just side tracking again. I talked about commercial growing in commercial agriculture. Of course there is a samll amount of humus available in potting soil mixes made from such things such as composted manures and composted seage sludge. That does not mean the commercial agricultural system is going to use it. All across this country composed wastes are being hauled toland fills or eing incenerated be c cause the commercial agriculutural peoplw will not use it even though many times ar they are even offered monet to haul it away from its sources. Even many small farmers in gnore their live stock manures and just continue to depleted theor soils of tilth and humus by using nothing but chemical fertilizers. Youare either spending to much time stoned or do not read much other than sites on growing orchids and such. Your very far behind the curve Ben.

Folks like Schultz use a slow release food called Polyon, a product I buy in large quantities. Wow what part of left field did that come from.

There are many, many soluble fertilizers on the market made exclusivly for soil that have 12 to 13 and even many with 15 elements Ben. Just look around Ben and quit playing dumb. Hell even they cheap old standbyes for soil media pouse plant growers such as Rapid Grow, Sterns and Peters have sold for years water soluble fertilizers which contain everything as the full hydroponic formulas excepting for the magnesium sulfate and calcium. They are definitely soil formulations as they all contain a but load of urea and have either all ammonical nitrogen or a very large percentage.

Yep, quite useless for the everyday stoner that just wants to open a bottle and plop a dollop of this and that into his root medium.

If you really want to get anal about all this (without all the confusion), Ben the only confusion is coming from your insane inability to admit to be wrong on any or almost all fronts in this particular discusiion. and in trying to twist the topic so as to try to duck all your blunders. Learning nor teaching is is being anal. Your crap about things being confusing is just that as you are causing any confusion that exists through your attempts to save face after your continual blunders.

I will no longer dispute your insane, ludicrous statemenst, lack of basic knowledge of nutrient chemistry and refusal to admit when your wrong.

UB
You all have a good night folks. fatman
 

jberry

Well-Known Member
this has been a great thread, i had to read all the way through once i started...

Fatman, you are one smart cookie... much respect, you are one of the most well informed people on this site that i have come across so far... keep the info coming buddy!
 

fatman7574

New Member
seriously?

2-1-3 isn't good for flowering? I'm kinda confused you actually telling me I should have more N for bloom than K?

I would boost the nitrogen, calcium and magnesium.

I mix my own and use this is what I use for inert hydro as far as the major nutrients:

Bloom

PPM

Nitrogen 242
Phosphorus 86
Potassium 378
Magnesium 98
Calcium 194
Sulfur 130

As can be seen the ratios are not 3-1-2 but close and I think more ideal that the 3-1-2 ratio. 2.8-1-4.4 So basically close enough to say 3-1-4 with high calcium and magnesium.

Nitrate is easily leached out of soil but you can not leach a fertilizer from a nutrient resrvoir so the nitrogen ratio to potash can be lower than the Dynagrow 3-1-2. 3-1-3 would be better than 2-1-3 though.

If you can get this Calcium Nitrate and some Magnesium sulfate I would add this to your present formulation. If you have say a gallon of 100X concentrate this is what you would add to it. Basically it is just Cal-Mag as sold by Botanicare, except they also add some iron chelate.

ppm
Nitrogen 90
Magnesium 40
Calcium 117
Sulfur 53
Ounces
Calcium Nitrate 7.7
Magnesium Sulfate 5.4
Volume of Stock Solutions 1
Dilution Rate 100


That will get you up to about 3:1:3 with the extra Calcium and Magnesiun generally used during budding. Many people also like the extra Potash during budding so as to keep a better ionic balance when the plants starts taking up ammonical nitrogen and thereby dumping H+ ions.
 

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
Soo Ben, does that mean your saying that foliage pro is a good fert. for ponics?
Yes

Thanks Ben .....

I'm getting a water analysis ....
I hope it is from your extension agent. You'll get tech advice too should you have any questions.

Downloaded those PFD's you recommended ...
Sweet success...

I had read them ..

They are about media culture ...
Basic principles is what you're after. I used to grow orchids in lava rock using a soil designed food, Peters. This was hydro, soil-less, just not automated. I injected salts into my water system and watered manually. When I switched back to organics the plants did alot better. Why? Because these organics (osmunda fiber and fiber bark) contained elements plants need, that the foods were not supplying. Now, if I had used a complete food like Dyna-Gro in an inert rock, I would have done much better.

A lot of us are just ,incredibly awesome , everyday stoners ......

I'm not going for a degree here ....
Techno babble aside, that's what I mean. Most of the info here is not applicable, or practical if you will.

Fatman, you are one smart cookie... much respect, you are one of the most well informed people on this site that i have come across so far... keep the info coming buddy!
.....enter a forum puckering up dood.

seriously?

2-1-3 isn't good for flowering? I'm kinda confused you actually telling me I should have more N for bloom than K?
Think outside of the (forum) box. It's leaves that produce bud, not your nutes. You need to support leaf production and maintenance up until harvest for maximum production. This goes against the typical forum paradigms, mis-given concepts where for some oddball reason yellowing, non-productive leaves is a good thing.

Regarding the 2-1-3, you'll just have to read your plants. I was thinking you were in veg, was also thinking of the multitude of cannabis specific "grow" foods that always have more K than N, which I never have understood. Results are always the same, peeps whining about yellowing leaves and premature leaf drop. You should use a 1-3-2 for a flowering food where the K is twice that of the N. Fine as long as you don't get the premature leaf drop thingie.

UB
 
Top