• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

LMFAO. Weather channel founder to sue Al Gore for 'global warming fraud'

Dankdude

Dankdude

Well-Known Member
One reason I don't buy into all the Global warming theory is because most of the predictions are based off of "Computer Models". As anyone knows when it comes to programing, if there is even one line of code, or one wrong symbol in the machine language, then it is flawed. I have yet to see a perfectly written program.

Besides I refuse to run around like "Chicken Little" screaming that "The Sky Is Falling".

 
We TaRdED

We TaRdED

Well-Known Member
I couldn't find it on the internet to watch. If you find a link that I can easily watch it from then I will.

Med, you have to understand a few things. I am NOT pro pollution, I am pro green. I could bet my life that I am more energy efficient than you. I recycle pretty much everything that can be recycled, from my milk containers to my cans from canned goods.

I'm not saying that we shouldn't be aware the effects we are having on the environment. Rather, I'm saying co2 is not the catalyst to this 'global warming' scare tactic. People should be more concerned with smog than co2. Are there things we should concern our selves with? Yes, of course, we are limited to a finite amount of resources so we have to keep a balance. I could go on saying what I think we could do to improve the earth but its not going to change anything. ~lol~


.
 
blonddie07

blonddie07

Well-Known Member
Pollution is another thing, but to lie to people saying that WE are creating this problem, and it is overheating our earth is the most STUPIDEST thing ever. If you really believe this, either you havnt done research, or your just really old and lazy to believe anything else.

Its the perfect item to tax. Somthing that will always be there, and somthing that almost everything creates. Co2. Thats like taxing people for Movement. "every 1 foot you walk, its 15 cents please. Thank you"

6 billion even 10 billion humans can no way in hell EVER raise the temps of the earth. Unless there was a nuke war.
 
We TaRdED

We TaRdED

Well-Known Member
blonddie07 said:
Pollution is another thing, but to lie to people saying that WE are creating this problem, and it is overheating our earth is the most STUPIDEST thing ever. If you really believe this, either you havnt done research, or your just really old and lazy to believe anything else.
Click to expand...
blonddie07 said:

Its the perfect item to tax. Somthing that will always be there, and somthing that almost everything creates. Co2. Thats like taxing people for Movement. "every 1 foot you walk, its 15 cents please. Thank you"

6 billion even 10 billion humans can no way in hell EVER raise the temps of the earth. Unless there was a nuke war.
Click to expand...


Its the perfect item to tax. Somthing that will always be there, and somthing that almost everything creates. Co2. Thats like taxing people for Movement. "every 1 foot you walk, its 15 cents please. Thank you"

~LOL~ Imagine that, having to pay a tax on your co2 contribution from breathing.... Not only would we have to pay taxes for everything we buy, but for breathing too.... As a note, man only creates ~3% of the total co2 emitted from earth.

Another thing that sucks is that commercial trucks can not run off biodiesel, and the price of fuel over hear is 5 dollars a gallon. When is the monopoly going to end?

6 billion even 10 billion humans can no way in hell EVER raise the temps of the earth. Unless there was a nuke war.

Its all relative, I'm not even sure if a nuke war would make a noticeable difference in global warming. People tend to forget that only 30% of the earth is land, and a lot less of the 30% is populated. I guess what I'm saying is that I don't know how many nukes it would take to globally change the earths temps even by 1/2 a degree for a year. I'd imagine it would take enough to destroy the earth population(in its entirety) 10 times, or more.........

RON PAUL REVOLUTION

~PEACE~
 
medicineman

medicineman

New Member
too old and lazy to believe anything else.

Well, now that you've described me, I guess I should just shut up, But I'll Not. Humans are responsible for a portion of the global warming. Since I am too old and lazy to look any further, you all might as well write me off as a lost cause. ~LOL~. I'm not kidding, I'm old and lazy, and I believe the above, sorry.
 
blonddie07

blonddie07

Well-Known Member
medicineman said:
too old and lazy to believe anything else.

Well, now that you've described me, I guess I should just shut up, But I'll Not. Humans are responsible for a portion of the global warming. Since I am too old and lazy to look any further, you all might as well write me off as a lost cause. ~LOL~. I'm not kidding, I'm old and lazy, and I believe the above, sorry.
Click to expand...

I respect the fact that you want to choose want YOU want to believe! Thats awesome!

I'm not going to force anyone to believe anything.. I will just present the situation, and you do your own research... but since your old an lazy.. fuckk that :)

:peace:
 
Johnnyorganic

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
We TaRdED said:
So, in your words johnny, whats your opinion on the subject after reading this thread? Do you think GW is mostly bullshyt or just as Al Gore described?:mrgreen:

RON PAUL REVOLUTION

~PEACE~
Click to expand...
Both side are wrong. It's difficult to pin the responsibility on one person or party.

There is no doubt climate change is occurring. The question is: What causes climate change?

Many on the left are trying to hold our love of the environment hostage to push the globalist agenda. Man Made Global Warming = An Anti-American and anti-capitalist scam.

The right should acknowledge the importance of protecting the environment and act on that. The right should pressure Detroit to make some dang fuel efficient cars. The right should be support sustainable energy as part of a new energy policy.
 
ccodiane

ccodiane

New Member
The market should acknowledge the importance of protecting the environment and act on that. The market should pressure Detroit to make some dang fuel efficient cars. The market should be support sustainable energy as part of a new energy policy. The right, and the left, should remove obstacles and lower taxes.
 
Johnnyorganic

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
ccodiane said:
The market should acknowledge the importance of protecting the environment and act on that. The market should pressure Detroit to make some dang fuel efficient cars. The market should be support sustainable energy as part of a new energy policy. The right, and the left, should remove obstacles and lower taxes.
Click to expand...
It should, but I think some government encouragement could not hurt. In reality, the market should have taken proper steps in 1973, when OPEC declared war on us by embargo. This is not the first time we've been squeezed over oil.
 
ccodiane

ccodiane

New Member
Johnnyorganic said:
It should, but I think some government encouragement could not hurt. In reality, the market should have taken proper steps in 1973, when OPEC declared war on us by embargo. This is not the first time we've been squeezed over oil.
Click to expand...
If it ended with just government encouragement, maybe, but that's like having a thief over for tea. Odds are good you'll be out more than just tea. Free markets are encouraged by profits, as it should be. If the market, us, demand a car with better fuel mileage, be damned if we don't get it. The only thing keeping the market from supplying the consumer with their demands, more often than not, is government regulation.

And really, what is a profit? A salary paid to investors.
 
Johnnyorganic

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
ccodiane said:
And really, what is a profit? A salary paid to investors.
Click to expand...
It looks like many of us benefit from the 'obscene' profits.
If you're wondering why driving to work has gotten so expensive, you might want to peruse your pension fund's investments. That's because speculation by institutional investors pouring money into the commodities market may be largely to blame for spiking oil prices, according to testimony on May 20 before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs.
Click to expand...
Are Pension Funds Fueling High Oil? : Business Week
Financial managers responsible for millions of Americans' retirement benefits told U.S. lawmakers who are increasingly blaming speculation for record fuel prices that they are not to blame. Congress has zeroed in on institutional investors as the culprit for the $4-plus ($1.05 a liter) gas prices smothering businesses and consumers.
Click to expand...
US pension funds warn that crackdown on oil market speculation could hurt retiree benefits - International Herald Tribune
 
ccodiane

ccodiane

New Member
Hear, hear. And that's not even mentioning our fondness for warm meals and hot showers.

The most telling flaw of government and their business savvy, or lack thereof, is their tendency to vilify businesses for making "obscene" profits whilst, at the same time, truly obscene losses are merely subsidized, and often encouraged.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top