• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

Liberal censorship - We know you can burn a book, but can you light a kindle?

Red1966

Well-Known Member
I disagree. Anyone dumb enough to become "gay bashing racists" were going to anyway, regardless of what anyone says. People "on the fence" aren't swayed by such stupid bullshit, as they were smart enough to come to the fence in the first place
You don't know what "on the fence" means??????????.....lol....
 

Sand4x105

Well-Known Member
Perhaps you missed it but most of the US is frozen solid.
Ahh come on Ben... that's:
"Weather".... Not Climate.... unless it's like the coldest year ever on record... then it's still just the weather...
And a holy fuck coldest winter ever? Maybe a trend... but the climate...
Fast forward...
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
And yet you conveniently left out all the millions of dollars funneled to the federal govt by said energy companies in the form of PACS. Who has a bigger stake in this game? The NSF or ExxonMobil? And do you think a website withe the tagline "The No. 1 Source for Energy and Oil News" that pops up asking for a subscription to "Energy Insider" might be biased? Not to mention the fact that article is over 3 years old. Like I said, carbon-tax credits are bullshit. Still doesn't excuse us to drive a Hummer to pick up groceries. And how exactly does riding your bike instead of driving benefit the govt that makes billions off gas taxes? Edit: Seriously, people like you have no idea what "tyranny" is. Riding your bike ain't it. Being slipped Po-210 in your tea because you're a political dissenter is.
PACs don't fund research...FAIL
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
So money spent on political connections can't affect scientific research funded by said money? The NSF isn't the Federal Govt. And you didn't address the fact that the feds receive billions in gasoline taxes. What do they have to gain by diminishing those funds? And finally, you used the word "sheeple", portraying you as a partisan hack that thinks YouTube gives them real answers. Seriously, "sheeple"? How old are you honestly? Anything older than 16 and still using that word means you are an idiot. Sorry, but that's the truth. Attack data, attack people, use some numbers to bolster your point, but please don't use the term "sheeple". Unless you're an OWS supporter. I seem to remember them loving that retarded term.
Are you dense? PAC money isn't spent on scientific research.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
So 2012 and 2005 being two of the hottest years on record and 2000-2010 being the hottest decade on record isn't evidence, and one year the average temperature decreases and all of a sudden, NOPE! HOAX!!
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
[h=1]NASA Global Warming Stance Blasted By 49 Astronauts, Scientists[/h]
On March 28 the group sent a letter to NASA administrator Charles Bolden, Jr., blasting the agency for making unwarranted claims about the role of carbon dioxide in global warming, Business Insider reported.
"We believe the claims by NASA and GISS [NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies], that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data," the group wrote. "With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/11/nasa-global-warming-letter-astronauts_n_1418017.html
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
So 2012 and 2005 being two of the hottest years on record and 2000-2010 being the hottest decade on record isn't evidence, and one year the average temperature decreases and all of a sudden, NOPE! HOAX!!
When you can say the hottest decade in a billion years, it might mean something. On record (180 years) is a fucking joke. UB won't follow this because it's simple division, but here goes. Your "on record" represents 1/25,000,000th of this planet's history. Time to manufacture a new "cause" to champion, this one's as dead as a dodo.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
/s/ Jack Barneburg, Jack – JSC, Space Shuttle Structures, Engineering Directorate, 34 years
/s/ Larry Bell – JSC, Mgr. Crew Systems Div., Engineering Directorate, 32 years
/s/ Dr. Donald Bogard – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 41 years
/s/ Jerry C. Bostick – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 23 years
/s/ Dr. Phillip K. Chapman – JSC, Scientist – astronaut, 5 years
/s/ Michael F. Collins, JSC, Chief, Flight Design and Dynamics Division, MOD, 41 years
/s/ Dr. Kenneth Cox – JSC, Chief Flight Dynamics Div., Engr. Directorate, 40 years
/s/ Walter Cunningham – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 7, 8 years
/s/ Dr. Donald M. Curry – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Leading Edge, Thermal Protection Sys., Engr. Dir., 44 years
/s/ Leroy Day – Hdq. Deputy Director, Space Shuttle Program, 19 years
/s/ Dr. Henry P. Decell, Jr. – JSC, Chief, Theory & Analysis Office, 5 years
/s/Charles F. Deiterich – JSC, Mgr., Flight Operations Integration, MOD, 30 years
/s/ Dr. Harold Doiron – JSC, Chairman, Shuttle Pogo Prevention Panel, 16 years
/s/ Charles Duke – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 16, 10 years
/s/ Anita Gale
/s/ Grace Germany – JSC, Program Analyst, 35 years
/s/ Ed Gibson – JSC, Astronaut Skylab 4, 14 years
/s/ Richard Gordon – JSC, Astronaut, Gemini Xi, Apollo 12, 9 years
/s/ Gerald C. Griffin – JSC, Apollo Flight Director, and Director of Johnson Space Center, 22 years
/s/ Thomas M. Grubbs – JSC, Chief, Aircraft Maintenance and Engineering Branch, 31 years
/s/ Thomas J. Harmon
/s/ David W. Heath – JSC, Reentry Specialist, MOD, 30 years
/s/ Miguel A. Hernandez, Jr. – JSC, Flight crew training and operations, 3 years
/s/ James R. Roundtree – JSC Branch Chief, 26 years
/s/ Enoch Jones – JSC, Mgr. SE&I, Shuttle Program Office, 26 years
/s/ Dr. Joseph Kerwin – JSC, Astronaut, Skylab 2, Director of Space and Life Sciences, 22 years
/s/ Jack Knight – JSC, Chief, Advanced Operations and Development Division, MOD, 40 years
/s/ Dr. Christopher C. Kraft – JSC, Apollo Flight Director and Director of Johnson Space Center, 24 years
/s/ Paul C. Kramer – JSC, Ass.t for Planning Aeroscience and Flight Mechanics Div., Egr. Dir., 34 years
/s/ Alex (Skip) Larsen
/s/ Dr. Lubert Leger – JSC, Ass’t. Chief Materials Division, Engr. Directorate, 30 years
/s/ Dr. Humbolt C. Mandell – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Program Control and Advance Programs, 40 years
/s/ Donald K. McCutchen – JSC, Project Engineer – Space Shuttle and ISS Program Offices, 33 years
/s/ Thomas L. (Tom) Moser – Hdq. Dep. Assoc. Admin. & Director, Space Station Program, 28 years
/s/ Dr. George Mueller – Hdq., Assoc. Adm., Office of Space Flight, 6 years
/s/ Tom Ohesorge
/s/ James Peacock – JSC, Apollo and Shuttle Program Office, 21 years
/s/ Richard McFarland – JSC, Mgr. Motion Simulators, 28 years
/s/ Joseph E. Rogers – JSC, Chief, Structures and Dynamics Branch, Engr. Directorate,40 years
/s/ Bernard J. Rosenbaum – JSC, Chief Engineer, Propulsion and Power Division, Engr. Dir., 48 years
/s/ Dr. Harrison (Jack) Schmitt – JSC, Astronaut Apollo 17, 10 years
/s/ Gerard C. Shows – JSC, Asst. Manager, Quality Assurance, 30 years
/s/ Kenneth Suit – JSC, Ass’t Mgr., Systems Integration, Space Shuttle, 37 years
/s/ Robert F. Thompson – JSC, Program Manager, Space Shuttle, 44 years/s/ Frank Van Renesselaer – Hdq., Mgr. Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters, 15 years
/s/ Dr. James Visentine – JSC Materials Branch, Engineering Directorate, 30 years
/s/ Manfred (Dutch) von Ehrenfried – JSC, Flight Controller; Mercury, Gemini & Apollo, MOD, 10 years
/s/ George Weisskopf – JSC, Avionics Systems Division, Engineering Dir., 40 years
/s/ Al Worden – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 15, 9 years
/s/ Thomas (Tom) Wysmuller – JSC, Meteorologist, 5 years

LOL
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
When you can say the hottest decade in a billion years, it might mean something. On record (180 years) is a fucking joke. UB won't follow this because it's simple division, but here goes. Your "on record" represents 1/25,000,000th of this planet's history. Time to manufacture a new "cause" to champion, this one's as dead as a dodo.
There's no good reason not to transition to alternative energy sources. It's inevitable either way you cut it, there's nothing you can do about it
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It is a political manipulation of science to promote fears and take more power and control from the people.
says the idiot who fell for the skewed polls conspiracy, the "iran is landlocked" lie, and thinks forest fires cause global warming.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Well, they don't work for big oil, so I'll try to discount their work because they once talked to a guy who ate dinner in the same restaurant as a guy who TOOK EVANGELICAL DONATIONS.
no, they work very closely with roy spencer, who has taken an evangelical pledge on global warming, believes in creationism, and is the official climatologist of the rush limbaugh show.

christy, spencer, and mcnider are a laughing stock among their peers and their work has been consistently torn apart as retarded, shoddy science.

14 point romney lead.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
And yet you conveniently left out all the millions of dollars funneled to the federal govt by said energy companies in the form of PACS.

Who has a bigger stake in this game? The NSF or ExxonMobil?

And do you think a website withe the tagline "The No. 1 Source for Energy and Oil News" that pops up asking for a subscription to "Energy Insider" might be biased? Not to mention the fact that article is over 3 years old.

Like I said, carbon-tax credits are bullshit. Still doesn't excuse us to drive a Hummer to pick up groceries. And how exactly does riding your bike instead of driving benefit the govt that makes billions off gas taxes?

Edit: Seriously, people like you have no idea what "tyranny" is. Riding your bike ain't it. Being slipped Po-210 in your tea because you're a political dissenter is.
well, he thinks rush limbaugh proteges, the heartland institute (exxonmobil funded), and discredited australian conspiracy websites are good sources, so not sure why he wouldn't think "oilprice.com" is a good one.
 
Top