January 6th hearings on Trump's failed insurrection.

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
As Bannon Eyes Jail, Top Trump Aide Folds In Riot Probe

Donald Trump’s former chief of staff Mark Meadows is now cooperating with investigators looking into the January 6th insurrection. His decision comes after Trump ally Steve Bannon was indicted for dodging investigators.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Maybe, he still could just be playing the clock to stretch it out a bit by pretending that he is going to cooperate but as soon as he gets asked anything he then claims Executive Privilege/5th.

Lucy and the football kind of game is something that should be expected at this point.

 

CunningCanuk

Well-Known Member
Maybe, he still could just be playing the clock to stretch it out a bit by pretending that he is going to cooperate but as soon as he gets asked anything he then claims Executive Privilege/5th.

Lucy and the football kind of game is something that should be expected at this point.

I wondered how many of those 6000 emails he handed over were from his spam folder.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
I wondered how many of those 6000 emails he handed over were from his spam folder.
Meadows already committed the crime by failing to show, he has something far worse to hide, his trouble is there were plenty of other people around too and a lot of documents. He's a candidate for "pocket immunity" for those things he testifies to, he can pull all the strings together as his chief of staff. Someone on the inside has already cracked, but different people were involved in different aspects of the coup and crimes. I'm pretty sure Jared has been quietly spilling his guts, or will for a deal, all of these assholes will cut anybody's throat to get away from doing time for their crime.

I expect some of these jerks will crack, squeal for a deal and blow the whole thing wide open. We basically know everything that happened before and after the election, just the details, documents and witnesses are required and witnesses will be plentiful as will the details and documents. Most of these people kept notes at the time and memorialized conversations to protect themselves and to use for a future book, especially the underlings.

They need an independent special counsel for this shit, some one with lot's of power and scope, members of congress are involved and I figure their report will have that recommendation in it, among other things. Take it out of Garland's hands and give it to a former republican patriot who hates their fucking guts and figures they are all a bunch of traitors. Pick a real fucking old fire breather who will put the fear of Jesus into them and get lot's of squeal deals from underlings.
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
Meadows already committed the crime by failing to show, he has something far worse to hide, his trouble is there were plenty of other people around too and a lot of documents. He's a candidate for "pocket immunity" for those things he testifies to, he can pull all the strings together as his chief of staff. Someone on the inside has already cracked, but different people were involved in different aspects of the coup and crimes. I'm pretty sure Jared has been quietly spilling his guts, or will for a deal, all of these assholes will cut anybody's throat to get away from doing time for their crime.

I expect some of these jerks will crack, squeal for a deal and blow the whole thing wide open. We basically know everything that happened before and after the election, just the details, documents and witnesses are required and witnesses will be plentiful as will the details and documents. Most of these people kept notes at the time and memorialized conversations to protect themselves and to use for a future book, especially the underlings.

They need an independent special counsel for this shit, some one with lot's of power and scope, members of congress are involved and I figure their report will have that recommendation in it, among other things. Take it out of Garland's hands and give it to a former republican patriot who hates their fucking guts and figures they are all a bunch of traitors. Pick a real fucking old fire breather who will put the fear of Jesus into them and get lot's of squeal deals from underlings.
To that last paragraph: yes!
 

captainmorgan

Well-Known Member
Stinky was right that there is a lot of voter fraud, by the GOP.


 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Jan. 6 Committee To Vote On Jeffrey Clark Contempt Charges

The bipartisan committee investigating the January 6th insurrection released a report recommending that former Department of Justice official Jeffrey Clark be held in contempt over his refusal to cooperate with a committee subpoena.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Media giants side with Bannon on request to release Jan. 6 documents
A coalition of media giants is siding with Stephen Bannon in his push for the release of documents pertaining to his contempt of Congress charges related to the House investigation in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

The media organizations — including The Washington Post, The New York Times, CNN and NBC News — filed a legal brief that opposes prosecutors’ proposal to shield documents related to Bannon’s contempt case, according to the Post.

Prosecutors are urging the Justice Department to issue a protective order on the documents, which reportedly includes more than 1,000 pages of witness testimony, grand-jury proceedings and others documents compiled during the discovery process in Bannon’s case.

They are arguing that releasing the documents would drum up publicity that could influence the jury selection process and intimidate witnesses before the trial even starts, according to the Post. In a previous brief, prosecutors reportedly wrote that Bannon’s past public statements “make clear that defense’s real purpose [is] to abuse criminal discovery to try this case in the media rather than in court.”

The former Trump White House adviser, however, is pushing for the materials to be released.

Bannon was indicted by a federal grand jury last month on two counts of contempt of Congress for failing to appear at a scheduled deposition in October before the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. He pleaded not guilty to both counts.

If the prosecutors ultimately impose the protective order, journalists would be barred from viewing the documents, the Post noted.

In their brief, attorneys representing the media companies said the proposed protective order was “overbroad” and would restrict what information the public is able to access in relation to the case, the Post reported.

The media giants are also arguing that the order would infringe on the First Amendment by forbidding Bannon and his lawyer from talking with the press about the proceedings.

The media organizations’ brief on behalf of the former White House adviser represents an alliance between two unlikely partners, considering Bannon often lambastes the "mainstream media."

Bannon in January 2017, after then-President Trump was inaugurated, said “The media should be embarrassed and humiliated and keep its mouth shut and just listen for a while.” He also called the press the “opposition party.”

Judge Carl J. Nichols, who was appointed by Trump in June 2019, is presiding over the case, according to the Post.

ABC News, BuzzFeed News, CBS News, Dow Jones & Co., which is the publisher of the Wall Street Journal, Gannett Co., the Los Angeles Times, NPR, ProPublica, E.W. Scripps Co., Gray Media Group and Tegna Inc. are also included in the brief, according to the Post.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Cheney warns of consequences for Trump in dealings with Jan. 6 committee
Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), the vice chairwoman of the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, suggested Wednesday that former President Trump could be held responsible for any falsehoods exchanged with the panel.

“President Trump continues to make the same false claims about a stolen election with which he has misled millions of Americans. These are the same claims he knows provoked violence in the past. He has recently suggested that he wants to debate members of this committee,” Cheney said.

“This committee's investigation into the violent assault on our Capitol on Jan. 6 is not a game. When this committee convenes hearings, witnesses will be called to testify under oath. Any communications Mr. Trump has with this committee will be under oath. And if he persists in lying, then he will be accountable under the laws of this great nation and subject to criminal penalties for every false word he speaks.”

Cheney’s comments came at a business meeting where the panel forwarded its second referral for criminal contempt to the full House, in this case for Jeffrey Clark, a former Justice Department official who was central to Trump’s efforts to pressure the department to act on his baseless claims of voter fraud.

If Trump, like Clark, failed to appear before the committee following a subpoena, a contempt report would detail all the exchanges between him and his attorneys and committee staff. If he appeared, he could face charges if he lied to congressional investigators. It’s the same charge his confidant Roger Stone, now also subpoenaed by the committee, faced before being pardoned by Trump.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member


 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Trump DOJ official to plead the 5th -- and Capitol riot committee will 'hang it around his neck'

Trump DOJ official to plead the 5th -- and Capitol riot committee will 'hang it around his neck'
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Here’s Everything Trump Did After Testing Positive For Covid

“Donald Trump is a textbook narcissist with no regard for anybody but himself. Today we’ve learned that the depths of his selfishness and disregard for others were even deeper than previously known,” says Chris Hayes on Trump’s reckless behavior after testing positive for Covid.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Former DOJ Official Jeffrey Clark to Plead the 5th Amendment for Crimes he Committed w/Donald Trump

In a stunning turn of events, former top Department of Justice official Jeffrey Clark indicated through his attorney that he is prepared to invoke his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination. Here is why he undoubtedly has a right against self-incrimination for the conspiratorial crimes he committed with Donald Trump designed to corruptly overturn the result of the presidential election. Also, the fact that a former DOJ official needs to plead the 5th makes clear that the Department of Justice MUST criminally investigate one of their own former officials. To fail to do so would be a gross example of cronyism and governmental corruption.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
'Something Went On That's Illegal': Former Trump DOJ Official To Invoke Fifth Amendment

Rep. Bennie Thompson, chair of the January 6th Committee, talks with Rachel Maddow about what it means that former Trump DOJ official Jeffrey Clark now says he plans to invoke the Fifth Amendment in his testimony in the committee's investigation, and how the committee can tell they've hit a sore spot in Donald Trump's scheme to overturn his 2020 election loss.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
'Something Went On That's Illegal': Former Trump DOJ Official To Invoke Fifth Amendment

Rep. Bennie Thompson, chair of the January 6th Committee, talks with Rachel Maddow about what it means that former Trump DOJ official Jeffrey Clark now says he plans to invoke the Fifth Amendment in his testimony in the committee's investigation, and how the committee can tell they've hit a sore spot in Donald Trump's scheme to overturn his 2020 election loss.
fuck yeah...taking the fifth IS SAYING "i did something wrong, that would get me in trouble if i tell you about it..."
 
Top