January 6th hearings on Trump's failed insurrection.

rkymtnman

Well-Known Member
If that can be done he should do it. I suggest instead of JB reading them, hire Rudy to read everything on his cameo account.

Rudy will do it, he needs the money.
after i posted that, i bet alec baldwin reading them as trump woudl love to get back at trump for his recent shooting comments. lol.

but then you'd turn it into a comedy when it's not.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

I figure they gave Trump about 3 weeks of delay, meanwhile there are a ton of witnesses to go through, all are racking up big legal bills and most are not that rich, some are even desperate. There are many minions with pieces of the puzzle and desperados like Rudy who need to make a deal, in short there is a ton of evidence. They will get the documents, I doubt if the SCOTUS will hear the case and if they do it will be fast tracked. Not everybody is gonna turn down subpoenas, plenty will show up and testifying in public, one day the rats will be running and squealing. An independent special counsel is required to prosecute the 1/6 insurrection and events leading up to it, it was a criminal conspiracy if there ever was one.

We haven't heard much about the FBI's efforts in this area yet, I'm sure they've collected a lot of information and have had interviews with some of the key players.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Insurrection Defendant Gets 41 Months in Prison. But What of the Cases that are Set for Trial?

Judges are beginning to dole out stiffer sentences for insurrectionists, with Judge Royce Lamberth just sentencing defendant Scott Fairlamb to 41 months in prison. As reported by the Washington Post, at sentencing, Judge Lamberth commented that defendant Fairlamb was "smart to plead guilty rather than going to trial." However, there is a counter argument to the judge's observation.

Although more than 100 insurrection defendant's have pleaded guilty, there are between 30 and 40 defendants whose cases are set for trial. And more trials are being set every day. The fact that Donald Trump remains uncharged gives these defendants an additional argument to make at trial that they would not have if Trump was indicted. This video explores that argument and what the Department of Justice can do to defeat it.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Scrambling Trump’s Last-Ditch Effort To Stop WH Docs From Reaching Jan. 6 Committee

A federal appeals court has temporarily barred the release of Trump White House records to the January 6th Committee. Meanwhile, the probe is still getting closer to Trump with a slew of new subpoenas this week. MSNBC’s Dr. Jason Johnson is joined by Matt Miller, the former Chief Spokesperson for the Justice Department, and Betsy Woodruff Swan, National
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon indicted by federal grand jury for contempt of Congress
The indictment is a first: No one has been prosecuted for contempt of Congress when executive privilege was asserted.
If convicted, Bannon could face up to a year behind bars and a fine of up to $100,000.

The fact that the Justice Department was willing to charge him with criminal contempt, despite an assertion of executive privilege, may help persuade other reluctant witnesses to agree to cooperate with the committee's investigation.

Obtaining a conviction for any crime requires proof of acting with improper intent, and Bannon may have a strong defense in arguing that he was acting on the advice of his lawyer not to testify. Some federal courts have ruled that good faith reliance on the advice of counsel is a complete defense in a criminal contempt action.

The record of successful prosecutions for contempt of Congress is a slim one. The authority was widely invoked during the anti-communist hearings of the 1950s, but many of those cases ended either in acquittal or dismissal on appeal.

The last Justice Department prosecution of a contempt referral came in 1983, during the Superfund investigation in the Reagan administration. Former EPA official Rita Lavelle was charged with contempt but her case, too, ended in acquittal.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
One of the talking heads (Neil Cathcha or however it is spelled) had a really interesting point. In 20+ years in federal court Garland has not had a decision overruled by the SCOTUS ever. Meaning his shit is tight and if he did this it is unlikely to be able to get trolled away by these propagandists.

https://apnews.com/article/steve-bannon-donald-trump-congress-mark-meadows-subpoenas-70fcf59323df874b4a0def1f4c1222ccScreen Shot 2021-11-12 at 4.13.37 PM.png
MARKS, Miss. (AP) — Steve Bannon, a longtime ally to former President Donald Trump, was indicted Friday on two counts of contempt of Congress after he defied a congressional subpoena from the House committee investigating the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.

The Justice Department said Bannon, 67, was indicted on one count for refusing to appear for a deposition and the other for refusing to provide documents in response to the committee’s subpoena. It wasn’t immediately clear when he would be due in court.

Attorney General Merrick Garland said the indictment reflects the Justice Department’s “steadfast commitment” to ensuring that the department adheres to the rule of law.

Each count carries a minimum of 30 days of jail and a sentence of up to a year behind bars.

Bannon’s attorney did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. AP’s earlier story follows below.

MARKS, Miss. (AP) — The chairman of the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection said Friday that he will be recommending a contempt vote against former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows after he defied a subpoena and failed to show up for a deposition Friday.

“I will be recommending a contempt of Congress effort toward him next week — the same thing we did for Steve Bannon. We’ll probably do several more,” Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., said at an event in his home state.

The House voted last month to hold Bannon, an adviser to former President Donald Trump, in contempt after he similarly defied a committee subpoena to talk about his role in the violent attack. Meadows had been in discussions with the committee since his subpoena was issued in September, but his lawyer said Friday that Meadows has a “sharp legal dispute” with the panel as Trump has claimed executive privilege over the testimony.

Thompson had threatened contempt against Meadows in a letter to the lawyer, George Terwilliger, on Thursday, saying that if he failed to appear to answer the committee’s questions Friday it would be considered “willful non-compliance.” The committee would first have to vote on the contempt recommendation, then the full House would vote to send it to the Justice Department.

Meadows’ refusal to comply comes amid escalating legal battles between the committee and Trump as the former president has claimed privilege over documents and interviews the lawmakers are demanding.

The White House said in a letter Thursday that President Joe Biden would waive any privilege that would prevent Meadows from cooperating with the committee, prompting his lawyer to say Meadows wouldn’t comply.

“Legal disputes are appropriately resolved by courts,” said the lawyer, George Terwilliger. “It would be irresponsible for Mr. Meadows to prematurely resolve that dispute by voluntarily waiving privileges that are at the heart of those legal issues.”

As the sitting president, Biden has so far waived most of Trump’s assertions of privilege over documents. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan has backed Biden’s position, noting in one ruling this week that “Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President.”

The panel’s proceedings and attempts to gather information have been delayed as Trump appealed Chutkan’s rulings. On Thursday, a federal appeals court temporarily blocked the release of some of the White House records the panel is seeking, giving that court time to consider Trump’s arguments.

Still, the House panel is continuing its work, and lawmakers have already interviewed more than 150 witnesses so far as they attempt to build the most comprehensive record yet of how a violent mob of Trump’s supporters broke into the Capitol and temporarily halted the certification of Biden’s victory.

The committee has subpoenaed almost three dozen people, including former White House staffers, Trump allies who strategized about how to overturn his defeat and people who organized the giant rally on the National Mall the morning of Jan. 6. While some, like Meadows and Bannon, have balked, others have spoken to the panel and provided documents.

Meadows, a former GOP congressman from North Carolina, is a key witness for the panel. He was Trump’s top aide in the time between Trump’s loss in the November election and the insurrection, and was one of several people who pressured state officials to try and overturn the results. He was also by Trump’s side during much of the time, and he could provide information about what the former president was saying and doing during the attack.

“You were the president’s chief of staff and have critical information regarding many elements of our inquiry,” Thompson wrote in a letter accompanying the Sept. 23 subpoena to Meadows. “It appears you were with or in the vicinity of President Trump on Jan. 6, had communications with the president and others on January 6 regarding events at the Capitol and are a witness regarding activities of that day.”

Whether either Bannon or Meadows would face consequences will be up to the Justice Department, which has so far not said whether it will prosecute Bannon’s case. The panel has been been pushing the department to do so, but Attorney General Merrick Garland has made clear that his lawyers will make an independent decision.

The appeals court will hear arguments Nov. 30 in Trump’s separate case against the committee and the National Archives, an attempt to withhold documents from the panel. The arguments will take place before three judges nominated by Democratic presidents: Patricia Millett and Robert Wilkins, nominated by former President Barack Obama, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, an appointee of Biden.

Given the case’s magnitude, whichever side loses before the circuit court is likely to eventually appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Trump supporter who brought 11 Molotov cocktails to Jan. 6 rally pleads guilty
A 71-year-old Alabama man who allegedly brought firearms and 11 Molotov cocktails to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot pleaded guilty to weapons charges during a Friday hearing at a U.S. district court.

Lonnie Coffman's red GMC Sierra pickup truck, parked near the Capitol on Jan. 6, was found to contain hundreds of rounds of ammunition and a trove of weapons, including an assault rifle, a crossbow and stun gun. He was arrested on Jan. 6 after the rally and indicted on 14 counts in January.

Coffman pleaded guilty to two counts of possession of an unregistered firearm for the 11 Molotov cocktails — a cooler of jars filled with rags and ignitable substances — and to unlawfully carrying a pistol without a license in Washington, D.C.

But the rest of his charges were dropped as part of the plea agreement with the Department of Justice.

Coffman, who has been in custody since his arrest on Jan. 6, faces a separate charge in Alabama for possession of 12 additional jars filled with ignitable substances in his house.

Coffman is an ardent support of former President Trump, and his truck contained a handwritten note quoting Abraham Lincoln about overthrowing "the men who pervert the constitution."
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Steve Bannon indicted by federal grand jury
“Since my first day in office, I have promised Justice Department employees that together we would show the American people by word and deed that the department adheres to the rule of law, follows the facts and the law and pursues equal justice under the law,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement announcing the indictment.

“Today’s charges reflect the department’s steadfast commitment to these principles.”
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Steve Bannon indicted by federal grand jury
“Since my first day in office, I have promised Justice Department employees that together we would show the American people by word and deed that the department adheres to the rule of law, follows the facts and the law and pursues equal justice under the law,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement announcing the indictment.

“Today’s charges reflect the department’s steadfast commitment to these principles.”
halle-motherfuckin-goddamn-lua...it's about fucking time
 
Top