January 6th hearings on Trump's failed insurrection.

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
No they cannot be. If they were, then Joe could call the conservative justices in have them shot and issue pardons. It would be a suicide pact with Trump!
the law is the law, and it was written by lawyers...just because something is an obviously RIGHT answer doesn't mean for one second it is the correct answer...
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
It is so gross. You have to wonder if it was someone who was just so worked up that they had to take a dump. I know that according to at least a couple books/movies out there burglars will find themselves needing to crap during a break-in. Or were they just actual shit heads that thought they were sending a message.
Since you brought it up..remember when that astronaut tried to kill her rival? She had a fix to drive straight through without stopping- diapers..ummmm, back in 2007.

Captain Nowak, 43, was wearing a trench coat and wig when she was arrested early Monday morning. She told the police she had worn diapers on the journey so that she would not have to stop to use the restroom so she could arrive in time to meet Captain Shipman’s flight at the airport.

.

Know before you go or go before you go. Truckers do piss bottle.
 
Last edited:

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
the law is the law, and it was written by lawyers...just because something is an obviously RIGHT answer doesn't mean for one second it is the correct answer...
I has to be logical at least, if they ruled that Trump could pardon himself, then Joe could haul them in shoot them in the head and write his own pardon. Joe wouldn't do it, but Trump would! Donald has not issued any pardons for anybody who could be a witness against him over J6. Flynn, Stone and Bannon were pardoned in exchange for services and because he had to or they would rat him out. Bannon only got his at the last moment, Donald didn't trust him as much as Stone and Flynn, Bannon was involved in J6 because he had to be or Trump would not have pardoned him and he must have something on Donald or Donald would have screwed him over the pardon, it's all transactional with these guys.

Corrupt pardons are a no, it is a crime to take a bribe or favor for one, or have them as a coconspirator in criminal activity. Not much has been ruled by the SCOTUS on pardons because before Trump nobody needed to, nobody abused it like Trump and Obama didn't abuse it at all, he followed an established legal like process that Trump ignored.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
I has to be logical at least, if they ruled that Trump could pardon himself, then Joe could haul them in shoot them in the head and write his own pardon. Joe wouldn't do it, but Trump would! Donald has not issued any pardons for anybody who could be a witness against him over J6. Flynn, Stone and Bannon were pardoned in exchange for services and because he had to or they would rat him out. Bannon only got his at the last moment, Donald didn't trust him as much as Stone and Flynn, Bannon was involved in J6 because he had to be or Trump would not have pardoned him and he must have something on Donald or Donald would have screwed him over the pardon, it's all transactional with these guys.

Corrupt pardons are a no, it is a crime to take a bribe or favor for one, or have them as a coconspirator in criminal activity. Not much has been ruled by the SCOTUS on pardons because before Trump nobody needed to, nobody abused it like Trump and Obama didn't abuse it at all, he followed an established legal like process that Trump ignored.
i'm not talking about trump pardoning himself...that's a joke that will never stand...i'm asking are the pardons he probably dispensed to greene, gaetz, meadows, graham et al legitimate, seeing as how they were issued by a criminal to criminal co-conspirators, to cover crimes they were still actively participating in?
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
i'm not talking about trump pardoning himself...that's a joke that will never stand...i'm asking are the pardons he probably dispensed to greene, gaetz, meadows, graham et al legitimate, seeing as how they were issued by a criminal to criminal co-conspirators, to cover crimes they were still actively participating in?
Like I said, much of pardon law has not been tested, there was no need. Jack would probably challenge them, if he had evidence, Garland would need to approve. This would set future precident so expect the SCOTUS to proceed with caution, it makes new law. If they were ensnared in a J6 conspiracy Trump was part of and pulled out a pocket pardon, there would be a problem!
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
They will break the ice with indicting Trump over the documents, it's an easy case and he will go down long before the indictments or trials over J6. I think Jack's focus is now on J6 and on other political players, Donald and his cronies are in the bag. Mark Meadows is the keystone, turn him and conspiracy central falls apart for several conspiracies involving lots of people including elected officials other than Trump.


John Dean makes prediction about DOJ filing charges against Trump

37,022 views Dec 18, 2022 #CNN #News
Former Nixon White House counsel and CNN contributor John Dean discusses the January 6th House select committee's potential criminal referrals to the Department of Justice of former President Donald Trump and his allies. #CNN #News
 
Last edited:

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
They will break the ice with indicting Trump over the documents, it's an easy case and he will go down long before the indictments or trials over J6. I think Jack's focus is now on J6 and on other political players, Donald and his cronies are in the bag. Mark Meadows is the keystone, turn him and conspiracy central falls apart for several conspiracies involving lots of people including elected officials other than Trump.


John Dean makes prediction about DOJ filing charges against Trump

37,022 views Dec 18, 2022 #CNN #News
Former Nixon White House counsel and CNN contributor John Dean discusses the January 6th House select committee's potential criminal referrals to the Department of Justice of former President Donald Trump and his allies. #CNN #News
Oh sure NOW he makes a prediction..sorry predictor window has been closed on Trump & Co.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
This gif is riveting; pretty seamless, I can't tell where his breathing begins and ends. When was that? Jutting out his bottom teeth looking like a gorilla or local militia..all that heavy breathing I'm surprised he didn't hyperventilate.
Lucky find and not sure when. I searched “that man angry” and scored that bit o’ hyperventilation.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
It's pretty fresh; I haven't seen but so him..can you imagine living with that thing?
I have decided I won’t even try. The way he strings words together for pure violations of reason would be like replacing my roll of Charmin with an angle grinder. It would impel me to spend the night considering unusual modes of very leisurely homicide, and to rent the de rigueur country house with a soundproof basement.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
I'm confused. If it's 10:30AM MST then it's 12:30PM EST.. Where is this meeting? I feel like playing wack a mole trying to find and only seeing old footage..did the time reschedule? Am I wrong about time?

Jesus already..I want live footage not stream later!
IM not sure what time it was supposed to start. I was not paying that close attention, figured if I missed it I could just rewind to the start.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
I have decided I won’t even try. The way he strings words together for pure violations of reason would be like replacing my roll of Charmin with an angle grinder. It would impel me to spend the night considering unusual modes of very leisurely homicide, and to rent the de rigueur country house with a soundproof basement.
You do live in the desert..I try to imagine how far in..said you had a neighbor who was planning on moving..perhaps to your country house with soundproof basement?

The desert has mines and all sorts of hiding places..we're gonna start J6!
 
Top