January 6th, 2021

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Poor Mitch, duped by a predictable moron with an IQ of 78... Mitch wanted Georgia and that was all, but Donald screwed him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
McConnell: Trump Tricked Me Into Backing His Coup (nymag.com)

On November 9, a senior Republican explained what was then the Republican Party’s consensus posture toward President Trump’s refusal to accept the election results. The quote, given anonymously to the Washington Post, became instantly notorious: “What is the downside for humoring him for this little bit of time? No one seriously thinks the results will change.”

Needless to say, that explanation looks even worse now. McConnell and his allies are trying to launder their reputations. McConnell’s excuse is contained within a deeply reported New York Times narrative account of Trump’s election challenge. Apparently, McConnell was duped by Trump and his wily son-in-law:
more...
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
New Reporting Shows White House Role In Directing Trump Mob To Capitol

Jim Rutenberg, writer-at-large for the New York Times, talks with Rachel Maddow about new reporting from the New York Times that the January 6th Trump rally was not meant to end in a march on the Capitol until the Trump White House took over the planning.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Trump should know you can't get something for nothing. Oh wait, that is what he has been selling all along. Even then, $3 million out of $170 million does not seem like a bad deal. that is unless you already spent all that money on administrative fees. Got to pay off loans, you know. Also, you would think you could write off the $3 million as a failed business expense.
Trump, former impeachment lawyer argued over fees: report
Former President Trump and his ex-impeachment lawyer Butch Bowers argued over legal fees in a dispute that compounded disagreements about the defense team’s strategy, Axios reported on Tuesday. The conflict resulted in Bowers, along with four other attorneys, reportedly leaving the team over the weekend and the Trump team announcing David Schoen and Bruce L. Castor Jr. as the new leading attorneys for his defense on Sunday. The disagreements highlighted the challenges the 45th president faces in forming a legal team to argue against his second impeachment.

Sources familiar with conversations between Trump and Bowers, who was connected with the former president through Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), told Axios they quarreled over the price of compensation over several phone calls. The initial agreement was that Trump would pay Bowers $250,000 for his individual services, which “delighted” the former president, a source told Axios. But Trump did not realize this figure did not include funding for more lawyers, researchers and other legal fees.

When Bowers came back with a $3 million budget, Trump and his team grew angry, despite the fact that he had raised $170 million for legal defense spending as his team had already prepared to separately fund audiovisuals, a rapid-response team and a legislative liaison.
Trump's team reportedly believed the case to be fairly simply after only five GOP senators rejected an effort by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) to declare the looming trial unconstitutional. "I think there was some problems getting money for it, but it wasn't [just] that,” Graham said, according to Axios. "Just too many cooks in the kitchen." Senior adviser Jason Miller confirmed to The Hill his comments to Axios, calling the former legal team “no longer relevant.”

“We have our lawyers in place, we have a solid team, and we're looking ahead," Miller said.
Schoen, one of the current defense attorneys, told Fox News’s Sean Hannity that he plans to argue that convicting Trump of inciting the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol would jeopardize free speech in general. Trump’s defense will also assert that impeaching him after he's left office is unconstitutional and that some rioters had planned to storm the Capitol ahead of Trump’s speech to supporters.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Missouri Newspaper Tells Josh Hawley to 'Impose Law and Order' on Donald Trump or Resign (newsweek.com)

Missouri Newspaper Tells Josh Hawley to 'Impose Law and Order' on Donald Trump or Resign

A major Missouri newspaper has called on Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) to hold former President Donald Trump accountable in his upcoming second impeachment trial or resign.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch published an editorial on Monday urging Hawley and his Republican colleagues to "impose law and order on Trump" and cited the deadly Capitol riot on January 6.

Hawley was one of the most prominent Republicans to object to President Biden's 2020 election victory. He supported formal objections to the Electoral College votes from Arizona and Pennsylvania.

The editorial said that Trump's impeachment trial centered on a single question: "Did Donald Trump abide by his oath of office between the Nov. 3 presidential election and the Capitol Hill insurrection on Jan. 6?"

"Missouri's two Republican senators, Roy Blunt and Josh Hawley, seem confused on this point, diverting the argument to whether impeaching Trump after he's left office violates the Constitution instead of focusing on the far-more blatant constitutional violations the world knows Trump committed," the newspaper said.

The editorial pointed out that Hawley, Blunt and 43 other GOP senators had tried to prevent the trial. Just five Republicans in the Senate voted against a motion arguing the impeachment was unconstitutional.

"But there's still time for them to switch gears and fulfill their sworn oath to impartially weigh Trump's guilt or innocence," the St. Louis Post-Dispatch said.

"There is no way to credibly argue that Trump protected and defended the Constitution when video evidence shows him directing a mob to storm the Capitol and interrupt constitutionally mandated proceedings to certify the Electoral College result."

The newspaper quoted Trump's comments at the January 6 "Save America" rally that immediately preceded the riot at the Capitol. During his speech to the crowd, Trump again disputed Biden's win and said "if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore."

"The insurrectionists obviously were dangerous and violent. Some came dressed in tactical gear, carrying zip-tie handcuffs. Five people died in the chaos as Capitol police struggled to hold protesters at bay," the editorial said.

Pointing to longstanding Republican claims to be the party of law and order, the newspaper said the "sole responsibility left to Hawley and his colleagues is to enforce the law and bring Trump to justice."

"Because any elected official who has law enforcement responsibility and won't do it needs to resign," the editorial concluded.

Trump's unprecedented second impeachment trial will begin on February 8 with the Senate now narrowly controlled by the Democrats. However, it's unlikely enough Republicans will vote to convict the former president.

Senator Josh Hawley has been asked for comment on this article.
 

Sofa King Smoooth

Well-Known Member
Missouri Newspaper Tells Josh Hawley to 'Impose Law and Order' on Donald Trump or Resign (newsweek.com)

Missouri Newspaper Tells Josh Hawley to 'Impose Law and Order' on Donald Trump or Resign

A major Missouri newspaper has called on Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) to hold former President Donald Trump accountable in his upcoming second impeachment trial or resign.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch published an editorial on Monday urging Hawley and his Republican colleagues to "impose law and order on Trump" and cited the deadly Capitol riot on January 6.

Hawley was one of the most prominent Republicans to object to President Biden's 2020 election victory. He supported formal objections to the Electoral College votes from Arizona and Pennsylvania.

The editorial said that Trump's impeachment trial centered on a single question: "Did Donald Trump abide by his oath of office between the Nov. 3 presidential election and the Capitol Hill insurrection on Jan. 6?"

"Missouri's two Republican senators, Roy Blunt and Josh Hawley, seem confused on this point, diverting the argument to whether impeaching Trump after he's left office violates the Constitution instead of focusing on the far-more blatant constitutional violations the world knows Trump committed," the newspaper said.

The editorial pointed out that Hawley, Blunt and 43 other GOP senators had tried to prevent the trial. Just five Republicans in the Senate voted against a motion arguing the impeachment was unconstitutional.

"But there's still time for them to switch gears and fulfill their sworn oath to impartially weigh Trump's guilt or innocence," the St. Louis Post-Dispatch said.

"There is no way to credibly argue that Trump protected and defended the Constitution when video evidence shows him directing a mob to storm the Capitol and interrupt constitutionally mandated proceedings to certify the Electoral College result."

The newspaper quoted Trump's comments at the January 6 "Save America" rally that immediately preceded the riot at the Capitol. During his speech to the crowd, Trump again disputed Biden's win and said "if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore."

"The insurrectionists obviously were dangerous and violent. Some came dressed in tactical gear, carrying zip-tie handcuffs. Five people died in the chaos as Capitol police struggled to hold protesters at bay," the editorial said.

Pointing to longstanding Republican claims to be the party of law and order, the newspaper said the "sole responsibility left to Hawley and his colleagues is to enforce the law and bring Trump to justice."

"Because any elected official who has law enforcement responsibility and won't do it needs to resign," the editorial concluded.

Trump's unprecedented second impeachment trial will begin on February 8 with the Senate now narrowly controlled by the Democrats. However, it's unlikely enough Republicans will vote to convict the former president.

Senator Josh Hawley has been asked for comment on this article.
He's a slimy little troll.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
"suffered “public embarrassment, humiliation, mental anguish and loss of seniority” due to the censure" Darn, there was a time saying stupid shit would get you that. Dumb leftists want to be handled with kid gloves so their egos don't get bruised.
Virginia GOP state senator sues after being censured by colleagues
Virginia state Sen. Amanda Chase (R) filed a federal lawsuit on Monday against the state Senate after its members voted to censure her for her apparent support of rioters involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, The Associated Press reported.

The Virginia State Senate voted 24-9 to censure Chase, a gubernatorial candidate, last week after she appeared to voice support for the rioters by calling them “patriots” while defending Ashli Babbit, a woman who was fatally shot by Capitol Police during the attack. Chase attended the pro-Trump rally in Washington, D.C., that preceded the riot, though she is not believed to have been among the mob that broke into the Capitol.

“The inflammatory statements and actions of Senator Amanda F. Chase during her tenure in the Senate of Virginia have created and aggravated tensions, misled constituents and citizens, and obstructed the Senate’s business in service of the Commonwealth,” read the resolution, which was passed last week.

Chase alleged in her lawsuit that she was being “singled out and selectively penalized for taking unpopular political positions” and said she had suffered “public embarrassment, humiliation, mental anguish and loss of seniority” due to the censure, according to the AP. Chase is asking that a judgement be issued stating that her First Amendment rights have been violated and has also requested that her seniority rank be reinstated.

The censure resolution also stated that Chase had posted the contact information for General Assembly colleagues whose votes she disagreed with.
State Sen. John Bell (D), who sponsored the resolution, said that Chase was free to pursue a lawsuit, according to the AP, but said he was sure her suit would be denied in court.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Trump lawyers call impeachment trial unconstitutional in laying out defense
Lawyers representing former President Trump on Tuesday detailed the defense they’ll lay out at next week’s impeachment trial, arguing that it is unconstitutional to impeach a former president and that Trump’s speech did not directly lead to the deadly siege on the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6. The filing from Trump’s attorneys David Schoen and Bruce Castor is in response to the article of impeachment passed last month by the House accusing Trump of “incitement of insurrection against the Republic he swore to protect.”

“It is denied that the 45the president of the United States ever engaged in a violation of his oath of office,” the defense attorneys wrote. “To the contrary, at all times Donald J. Trump fully and faithfully executed his duties as the president of the United States and at all times acted to the best of his ability to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States while never engaging in any high crimes or misdemeanors.” The briefing also argues that the Senate has no jurisdiction to impeach Trump since he is out of office. “The constitutional provision requires that a person actually hold office to be impeached,” Trump’s lawyers wrote.

Earlier on Tuesday, House Democrats outlined the case they intend to make against Trump, drawing a direct line from the president’s speech to a group of his supporters in Washington to the violent mob that later led the violent assault on the Capitol. The Democrats said Trump’s speech pointed a “loaded cannon” at the Capitol building and that his behavior “requires” he be convicted and barred from ever holding office again.

“President Trump’s conduct must be declared unacceptable in the clearest and most unequivocal terms,” the Democratic brief states. “This is not a partisan matter. His actions directly threatened the very foundation on which all other political debates and disagreements unfold. They also threatened the constitutional system that protects the fundamental freedoms we cherish.”

Democrats insist they have jurisdiction to impeach Trump again, saying the Constitution “vests the Senate with full jurisdiction to hear any valid impeachment case brought by the House for high crimes and misdemeanors.” In his rally speech on Jan. 6, Trump ticked through a litany of false or unproven claims about how the Democrats stole the election from him. In the brief, Trump’s lawyers denied that he made false election claims, stating that state election laws that were changed amid the pandemic justify some of his claims that the election was rigged against him.

"Insufficient evidence exists upon which a reasonable jurist could conclude that the 45th President’s statements were accurate or not, and he therefore denies they were false,” Trump’s lawyers wrote. The former president urged his supporters to march on the Capitol to protest the Electoral College vote that was going on, though Trump’s attorneys insist his rhetoric was peaceful and that he did not directly call for any illegal activity.

The rioters killed a police officer, vandalized the Capitol and terrorized lawmakers, sending them into hiding and fearing for their lives. As the mayhem developed and Vice President Pence sought refuge, Trump tweeted his anger at Pence for not stopping the vote count. Hours later, Trump called for calm but also praised the rioters as “very special” people.” The Democratic impeachment managers accused Trump of violating his oath of office, attacking the democratic process, imperiling Congress and undermining national security.

“The Nation will indeed remember January 6, 2021—and President Trump’s singular responsibility for that tragedy,” they wrote. “It is impossible to imagine the events of January 6 occurring without President Trump creating a powder keg, striking a match, and then seeking personal advantage from the ensuing havoc.”
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
'Tirades of profanity': Axios reporter describes Trump meeting

Axios reporter Jonathan Swan describes a December 18 meeting between President Donald Trump, White House officials and conspiracy theorists that ended in a profanity-laced shouting match. Swan, who has covered Donald Trump's presidency for years, called it one of the most dark and demented meetings of the administration.
 

topcat

Well-Known Member
Trump lawyers call impeachment trial unconstitutional in laying out defense
Lawyers representing former President Trump on Tuesday detailed the defense they’ll lay out at next week’s impeachment trial, arguing that it is unconstitutional to impeach a former president and that Trump’s speech did not directly lead to the deadly siege on the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6. The filing from Trump’s attorneys David Schoen and Bruce Castor is in response to the article of impeachment passed last month by the House accusing Trump of “incitement of insurrection against the Republic he swore to protect.”

“It is denied that the 45the president of the United States ever engaged in a violation of his oath of office,” the defense attorneys wrote. “To the contrary, at all times Donald J. Trump fully and faithfully executed his duties as the president of the United States and at all times acted to the best of his ability to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States while never engaging in any high crimes or misdemeanors.” The briefing also argues that the Senate has no jurisdiction to impeach Trump since he is out of office. “The constitutional provision requires that a person actually hold office to be impeached,” Trump’s lawyers wrote.

Earlier on Tuesday, House Democrats outlined the case they intend to make against Trump, drawing a direct line from the president’s speech to a group of his supporters in Washington to the violent mob that later led the violent assault on the Capitol. The Democrats said Trump’s speech pointed a “loaded cannon” at the Capitol building and that his behavior “requires” he be convicted and barred from ever holding office again.

“President Trump’s conduct must be declared unacceptable in the clearest and most unequivocal terms,” the Democratic brief states. “This is not a partisan matter. His actions directly threatened the very foundation on which all other political debates and disagreements unfold. They also threatened the constitutional system that protects the fundamental freedoms we cherish.”

Democrats insist they have jurisdiction to impeach Trump again, saying the Constitution “vests the Senate with full jurisdiction to hear any valid impeachment case brought by the House for high crimes and misdemeanors.” In his rally speech on Jan. 6, Trump ticked through a litany of false or unproven claims about how the Democrats stole the election from him. In the brief, Trump’s lawyers denied that he made false election claims, stating that state election laws that were changed amid the pandemic justify some of his claims that the election was rigged against him.

"Insufficient evidence exists upon which a reasonable jurist could conclude that the 45th President’s statements were accurate or not, and he therefore denies they were false,” Trump’s lawyers wrote. The former president urged his supporters to march on the Capitol to protest the Electoral College vote that was going on, though Trump’s attorneys insist his rhetoric was peaceful and that he did not directly call for any illegal activity.

The rioters killed a police officer, vandalized the Capitol and terrorized lawmakers, sending them into hiding and fearing for their lives. As the mayhem developed and Vice President Pence sought refuge, Trump tweeted his anger at Pence for not stopping the vote count. Hours later, Trump called for calm but also praised the rioters as “very special” people.” The Democratic impeachment managers accused Trump of violating his oath of office, attacking the democratic process, imperiling Congress and undermining national security.

“The Nation will indeed remember January 6, 2021—and President Trump’s singular responsibility for that tragedy,” they wrote. “It is impossible to imagine the events of January 6 occurring without President Trump creating a powder keg, striking a match, and then seeking personal advantage from the ensuing havoc.”
Those lawyers know Individual 1 was in office when impeached. They wouldn't tell that lie before a real judge, in a real courtroom. It would cost them.
 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
Those lawyers know Individual 1 was in office when impeached. They wouldn't tell that lie before a real judge, in a real courtroom. It would cost them.
That's irrelevant.

Fact is, there's already precedent. A former secretary of defense was impeached after leaving office.

Their argument is dead on arrival.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Bonus episode: Inside the craziest meeting of the Trump presidency
Four conspiracy theorists marched into the Oval Office. It was early evening on Friday, Dec. 18 — more than a month after the election had been declared for Joe Biden, and four days after the Electoral College met in every state to make it official.

"How the hell did Sidney get in the building?" White House senior adviser Eric Herschmann grumbled from the outer Oval Office as Sidney Powell and her entourage strutted by to visit the president.

President Trump's private schedule hadn't included appointments for Powell or the others: former national security adviser Michael Flynn, former Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne, and a little-known former Trump administration official, Emily Newman. But they'd come to convince Trump that he had the power to take extreme measures to keep fighting.

As Powell and the others entered the Oval Office that evening, Herschmann — a wealthy business executive and former partner at Kasowitz Benson & Torres who'd been pulled out of quasi-retirement to advise Trump — quietly slipped in behind them.

The hours to come would pit the insurgent conspiracists against a handful of White House lawyers and advisers determined to keep the president from giving in to temptation to invoke emergency national security powers, seize voting machines and disable the primary levers of American democracy......


Worth a read
 
Last edited:

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
You really should stop posting entire articles. It's blatant plagiarism.

Post a small excerpt and let people read the article on the site that paid for it.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
You really should stop posting entire articles. It's blatant plagiarism.

Post a small excerpt and let people read the article on the site that paid for it.
Usually I edit them down and not print the whole article. I also always give the link to the article. I did this whole one because I thought it all relevant, that it would not get read otherwise. Sure, I can just give the links.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Usually I edit them down and not print the whole article. I also always give the link to the article. I did this whole one because I thought it all relevant, that it would not get read otherwise. Sure, I can just give the links.
It was def. relevant. The whole series is. I saw what you were doing and why. FWIW, I agree with you about posting the whole thing. Others may disagree. Not a big deal one way or the other.
 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
Usually I edit them down and not print the whole article. I also always give the link to the article. I did this whole one because I thought it all relevant, that it would not get read otherwise. Sure, I can just give the links.
In the near future, this site can be fined 125,000 dollars for that plus punitive damages if they go to court.

I believe it kicks in around June of this year. I'll have to check.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Defense secretary removes hundreds of advisory board members in sweeping review
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin has ousted hundreds of members from the Pentagon's advisory committees, removing last-minute appointees by the Trump administration, the Department of Defense (DOD) revealed Tuesday.

Austin fired all members serving on DOD advisory boards and also ordered “the immediate suspension of all advisory committee operations until the review is completed,” effective Feb. 16. The boards are on hold while the Pentagon completes a “zero-based review” of at least 42 defense advisory committees, according to a Jan. 30 memo.
 
Top