It's Mueller Time
- Thread starter Herb & Suds
- Start date
Herb & Suds
Well-Known Member
Fake newsI've heard it said that Canadians are mellow people.
squarepush3r
Well-Known Member
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
More false bravado by the Trump camp.
A nerve was struck. It will be poked again. Time to toughen up, baby.
Herb & Suds
Well-Known Member
Excellent opinion post
Obepawn
Well-Known Member
Lol. In the Coachella Valley you have these palmetto bugs that show up in your house during hot weather, basically, cockroaches, but the rich people here call them water bugs. Paint that turd pink all you want, it's still a turd and white nationalism is a pink turd.
squarepush3r
Well-Known Member
Mueller Just Proved His Entire Operation Was A Political Hit Job That Trampled The Rule Of Law
At a hastily arranged Wednesday press conference, Special Counsel Robert Mueller proved that he was never interested in justice or the rule of law.
By Sean Davis
May 29, 2019
If there were any doubts about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s political intentions, his unprecedented press conference on Wednesday should put them all to rest. As he made abundantly clear during his doddering reading of a prepared statement that repeatedly contradicted itself, Mueller had no interest in the equal application of the rule of law. He gave the game, and his nakedly political intentions, away repeatedly throughout his statement...
https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/29/mueller-just-proved-his-entire-operation-was-a-political-hit-job-that-trampled-the-rule-of-law/
At a hastily arranged Wednesday press conference, Special Counsel Robert Mueller proved that he was never interested in justice or the rule of law.
By Sean Davis
May 29, 2019
If there were any doubts about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s political intentions, his unprecedented press conference on Wednesday should put them all to rest. As he made abundantly clear during his doddering reading of a prepared statement that repeatedly contradicted itself, Mueller had no interest in the equal application of the rule of law. He gave the game, and his nakedly political intentions, away repeatedly throughout his statement...
https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/29/mueller-just-proved-his-entire-operation-was-a-political-hit-job-that-trampled-the-rule-of-law/
Herb & Suds
Well-Known Member
Reported as SPAMMueller Just Proved His Entire Operation Was A Political Hit Job That Trampled The Rule Of Law
At a hastily arranged Wednesday press conference, Special Counsel Robert Mueller proved that he was never interested in justice or the rule of law.
By Sean Davis
May 29, 2019
If there were any doubts about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s political intentions, his unprecedented press conference on Wednesday should put them all to rest. As he made abundantly clear during his doddering reading of a prepared statement that repeatedly contradicted itself, Mueller had no interest in the equal application of the rule of law. He gave the game, and his nakedly political intentions, away repeatedly throughout his statement...
https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/29/mueller-just-proved-his-entire-operation-was-a-political-hit-job-that-trampled-the-rule-of-law/
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
Sean Davis looks like he couldn't get laid in a whore house,what a surprise,another angry far right incel.
Herb & Suds
Well-Known Member
Summer just got hotter as Mr Mueller the Republican prosecutor has told Congress he gave them the tools to start an impeachment inquiry
Americans want to hear it all too
Americans want to hear it all too
hotrodharley
Well-Known Member
I believe he’s a psychopath and the difference is intelligence. Sociopaths usually do have a high level of intelligence. They simply lack in empathy or sympathy. Psychopaths are the same except for intelligence basically. I honestly don’t believe Trump is intelligent enough to qualify as a sociopath. Not that it makes any difference in outcomes for us obviously.
Jimdamick
Well-Known Member
or Ivanka
Jimdamick
Well-Known Member
Trump is fucking done.
One year before his bid for re-election Mueller spoke to the Nation telling them that if it was any other human, Trump would have been indicted for obstruction, and or collusion with a foreign entity.
The only ones that will support him now are his imbecilic followers, not the majority, and even the Electoral College won't save his sorry ass this time around.
The writing is on the wall stating that Trump is a traitorous criminal, and that has now been verified after a 2 year investigation by the man that led it.
Trump can continue to lie all he wants, but any rational person knows him to be what he truly is, a win at all cost, fuck America, I'm the greatest piece of shit that ever walked the planet Earth.
Impeach/Impeach/Impeach/Impeach/Impeach/Impeach (taking a hit
) Impeach/Impeach/Impeach/Impeach (exhale) Impeach that COCKSUCKER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ok, I've vented and got a buzz on, so all is cool.
One year before his bid for re-election Mueller spoke to the Nation telling them that if it was any other human, Trump would have been indicted for obstruction, and or collusion with a foreign entity.
The only ones that will support him now are his imbecilic followers, not the majority, and even the Electoral College won't save his sorry ass this time around.
The writing is on the wall stating that Trump is a traitorous criminal, and that has now been verified after a 2 year investigation by the man that led it.
Trump can continue to lie all he wants, but any rational person knows him to be what he truly is, a win at all cost, fuck America, I'm the greatest piece of shit that ever walked the planet Earth.
Impeach/Impeach/Impeach/Impeach/Impeach/Impeach (taking a hit
) Impeach/Impeach/Impeach/Impeach (exhale) Impeach that COCKSUCKER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Ok, I've vented and got a buzz on, so all is cool.
squarepush3r
Well-Known Member
Mueller Puts Democrats In Tough Spot After Wednesday Speech
Wed, 05/29/2019 - 17:05
Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Wednesday remarks have put new pressure on House Democrats to launch impeachment proceedings against President Trump - an option that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has repeatedly warned would be a trap going into the 2020 election due to the fact that the GOP-held Senate would "vindicate" Trump even if the House impeached.
Mueller, who officially resigned from the DOJ to return to private life - said that he wouldn't appear before Congress to discuss the findings from the Justice Department's multi-year, $25 million investigations into the 2016 election.
"I hope and expect that this will be the only time I will speak to you about this matter," Mueller told reporters in Washington, adding "the report is my testimony" and "I would not provide information beyond that which is already public."
Of note, Mueller said that he didn't question Attorney General William Barr's handling and release of the Special Counsel's report, contradicting statements by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and turncoat Republican Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) - the latter of whom said Barr "deliberately misrepresented key aspects."
To impeach, or not to impeach
By specifically pointing out that the special counsel didn't levy charges at Trump due to longstanding DOJ policy not to prosecute a sitting president, Mueller effectively laid out a path to impeachment for Democrats to follow.
"It wasn't lack of evidence. It was DOJ policy" tweeted Rep. Val Demings (R-FL).
Mueller's refusal to testify also puts House Democrats in a tough spot. With a growing number of Democratic lawmakers pushing for leadership to launch impeachment proceedings, Pelosi and House Judiciary Chairman Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York are now left to decide whether Mueller gave them enough ammunition to move forward without his testimony, which Pelosi said would have been useful.
Rep. Eric Swalwell told CNN that "Seeing is believing...hearing Bob Mueller raise his right hand, testify to Congress, seeing the news capture that, that would be quite illuminating for most Americans." In other words, Mueller's refusal to testify will now be blamed for robbing Democrats of their opportunity to impeach, if they choose not to move forward with that option.
In Wednesday comments, Nadler was far more confrontational than Pelosi - saying that "All options are on the table and nothing should be ruled out" in terms of impeachment, adding "not event the president of the United States is above the law."
Staging a press conference Wednesday afternoon in New York, Nadler was similarly vague, sidestepping questions about whether he will compel Mueller’s testimony with a congressional subpoena.
“Mr. Mueller told us a lot of what we need to hear today,” Nadler said.
Before Mueller’s remarks, at least 37 House Democrats were on record backing the launch of an impeachment inquiry into Trump. Afterward, Reps. Betty McCollum (D-Minn.) and Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) added their names to the list, though most Democratic lawmakers responded by holding firm to Pelosi’s favored approach of continuing with investigations without making the leap to impeachment. -The Hill
"We must remain committed to aggressively investigating the president’s wrongdoing and we will not rest until the American people have answers," insisted Rep. Katherine Clark (D-MA), vice chairwoman of the Democratic Caucus - who apparently presumes guilt until proven innocent.
So Democrats are left with a special counsel who won't testify, and who just gave the left plenty of ammunition to impeach since Mueller implied that Trump may have committed crimes. And if they do launch impeachment proceedings, they might reach the Senate just in time for Trump to be vindicated in the court of public opinion.
Wed, 05/29/2019 - 17:05
Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Wednesday remarks have put new pressure on House Democrats to launch impeachment proceedings against President Trump - an option that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has repeatedly warned would be a trap going into the 2020 election due to the fact that the GOP-held Senate would "vindicate" Trump even if the House impeached.
Mueller, who officially resigned from the DOJ to return to private life - said that he wouldn't appear before Congress to discuss the findings from the Justice Department's multi-year, $25 million investigations into the 2016 election.
"I hope and expect that this will be the only time I will speak to you about this matter," Mueller told reporters in Washington, adding "the report is my testimony" and "I would not provide information beyond that which is already public."
Of note, Mueller said that he didn't question Attorney General William Barr's handling and release of the Special Counsel's report, contradicting statements by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and turncoat Republican Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) - the latter of whom said Barr "deliberately misrepresented key aspects."
To impeach, or not to impeach
By specifically pointing out that the special counsel didn't levy charges at Trump due to longstanding DOJ policy not to prosecute a sitting president, Mueller effectively laid out a path to impeachment for Democrats to follow.
"It wasn't lack of evidence. It was DOJ policy" tweeted Rep. Val Demings (R-FL).
Mueller's refusal to testify also puts House Democrats in a tough spot. With a growing number of Democratic lawmakers pushing for leadership to launch impeachment proceedings, Pelosi and House Judiciary Chairman Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York are now left to decide whether Mueller gave them enough ammunition to move forward without his testimony, which Pelosi said would have been useful.
Rep. Eric Swalwell told CNN that "Seeing is believing...hearing Bob Mueller raise his right hand, testify to Congress, seeing the news capture that, that would be quite illuminating for most Americans." In other words, Mueller's refusal to testify will now be blamed for robbing Democrats of their opportunity to impeach, if they choose not to move forward with that option.
In Wednesday comments, Nadler was far more confrontational than Pelosi - saying that "All options are on the table and nothing should be ruled out" in terms of impeachment, adding "not event the president of the United States is above the law."
Staging a press conference Wednesday afternoon in New York, Nadler was similarly vague, sidestepping questions about whether he will compel Mueller’s testimony with a congressional subpoena.
“Mr. Mueller told us a lot of what we need to hear today,” Nadler said.
Before Mueller’s remarks, at least 37 House Democrats were on record backing the launch of an impeachment inquiry into Trump. Afterward, Reps. Betty McCollum (D-Minn.) and Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) added their names to the list, though most Democratic lawmakers responded by holding firm to Pelosi’s favored approach of continuing with investigations without making the leap to impeachment. -The Hill
"We must remain committed to aggressively investigating the president’s wrongdoing and we will not rest until the American people have answers," insisted Rep. Katherine Clark (D-MA), vice chairwoman of the Democratic Caucus - who apparently presumes guilt until proven innocent.
So Democrats are left with a special counsel who won't testify, and who just gave the left plenty of ammunition to impeach since Mueller implied that Trump may have committed crimes. And if they do launch impeachment proceedings, they might reach the Senate just in time for Trump to be vindicated in the court of public opinion.
TacoMac
Well-Known Member
We're far beyond spin, dumb-dumb.
It's over for Trump. Within a few months, we'll have his financials. A few months after that, we'll all know his fraud was far beyond what we believed.
A few months after that, he and anyone stupid enough to stand by him are going down in flames.
Trump will from this point on be on the run.
It's all over for him now. He's just too stupid to see it yet. So are you.
Just got back from a few days in Russia. Even they know Trump's days are numbered now.
squarepush3r
Well-Known Member
The government/FBI/IRS/CIA/NSA all already have all of Drumpf's financial records, and they are all vetted clean. What are you expecting to come out by you personally reading them?
At the most it would show he isn't as rich as he claims and he would be embarrassed.
Its sad to see the same people living in delusion in the 2016 election not making an inch of progress into sanity. At least the Obama birther conspiracy people were fairy relegated to fringe websites, however the Trump/Russia collusion is literally #1 mainstream media and congress talking point for 2 years now. Way to jump the shark!
Democrats should stick to what make them popular in the first place, caring about working class average Americans and having policy to benefit them. Now their main focus is "hating Trump" and stupid identity politics.
shimbob
Well-Known Member
"Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano said Wednesday that special counsel Robert Mueller had indicated that he found evidence that Donald Trump committed a crime — but was unable to indict him because Trump is a sitting president."
Who are you going to believe, a judicial analyst or the braying opinionators of FoxNews?
Who are you going to believe, a judicial analyst or the braying opinionators of FoxNews?
TacoMac
Well-Known Member
Wrong. As usual.
The IRS has them. Under law, the IRS can't divulge what's in them to anyone. They also can't target them for review.
The NSA has no standing or jurisdiction, nor does the CIA or FBI.
You're beyond delusional with the complete bullshit you make up.
Why do you think Trump's fighting so very hard to keep them secret if they were vetted clean, dumb-dumb?
londonfog
Well-Known Member
why did you have to make a new account
londonfog
Well-Known Member
reeks of desperation