It's Class Warfare Alright.

it was an additional responsibility bestowed upon the fire department by politicians who obviously care more about political rambling than public safety.

fighting fires is already dangerous enough. we need these guys to focus on putting fires out.

not on focusing on unneeded bureaucratic nonsense that only serves to put the public in danger.

this reaction by the fire department could've happened just as easily through clerical error. is $75 dollars really worth letting somebody lose their home??

again I ask: WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS COUNTRY TURNING INTO??

you think the first people to move here, back on those ships, would've survived with this individualistic, selfish point of view?? or do you think they made it through the tough north american winter by working together, through a sense of society???

MuyLocoNC said:

Yeah, nice try. It was an inappropriate comment and you fucking know it. That's EXACTLY why you did it, you wanted to make it personal. So go fuck yourself, coward.

Click to expand...

it was a hypothetical, you thin-skinned, preening crybaby.

now go polish your guns so you can feel less ashamed of the toothpick you're wielding.

redivider said:

it was an additional responsibility bestowed upon the fire department by politicians who obviously care more about political rambling than public safety.

fighting fires is already dangerous enough. we need these guys to focus on putting fires out.

not on focusing on unneeded bureaucratic nonsense that only serves to put the public in danger.

this reaction by the fire department could've happened just as easily through clerical error. is $75 dollars really worth letting somebody lose their home??

again I ask: WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS COUNTRY TURNING INTO??

you think the first people to move here, back on those ships, would've survived with this individualistic, selfish point of view?? or do you think they made it through the tough north american winter by working together, through a sense of society???

Click to expand...

i was going to point this out.

"our records show you haven't paid"

"i did pay, and i have the receipt. allow me to fetch it out of my burning house"

MuyLocoNC said:

And any idiot can try to drive home a pathetic, weak-minded point, by describing violence and rape of their opponent's wife and children. It was nothing more than a thinly veiled threat. When some douchebag like Buck resorts to that kind of "mental violence" with me, it will be met with "mental violence". He's very lucky this is anonymous and online, if he tried that shit in person (which he wouldn't, you can tell he's a coward at heart), he would be in for a scuffle.

Click to expand...

sounds like we got a internet gangster..lol

hahaha



be careful!!!

londonfog said:

sounds like we got a internet gangster..lol

Click to expand...

Actually, quite the opposite. I was reacting to an internet gangster with his own bullshit.

UncleBuck said:

it was a hypothetical, you thin-skinned, preening crybaby.

now go polish your guns so you can feel less ashamed of the toothpick you're wielding.

Click to expand...

No one is arguing whether it was hypothetical or not, idiot.

It was inappropriate and unnecessary to the discussion. You know it, your three little cheerleaders know it, so go fuck yourself. You're a coward.

Your attitude and entire mentality are perfectly indicative of an internet jockey sporting a lap pinky, you're pissed off about it, and determined to make as many people as miserable as yourself. As Jeff likes to say "I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire".

UncleBuck said:

it was a hypothetical, you thin-skinned, preening crybaby.

now go polish your guns so you can feel less ashamed of the toothpick you're wielding.

Click to expand...

hilarious bro, holarious

MuyLocoNC said:

No one is arguing whether it was hypothetical or not, idiot.

It was inappropriate and unnecessary to the discussion. You know it, your three little cheerleaders know it, so go fuck yourself. You're a coward.

Your attitude and entire mentality are perfectly indicative of an internet jockey sporting a lap pinky, you're pissed off about it, and determined to make as many people as miserable as yourself. As Jeff likes to say "I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire".

Click to expand...

and i pissed myself when i seen this one. you guys should put that string of posts up for the funniest of the year. great stuff, keep it coming

"i hope some day muyloco's libertarian wet dream comes true and his family is being raped, and the police chief coldly replies "our records show you haven't paid"."

can't handle this? you are a pussy.

this might help:

oh hell no. if you think my very awesome thread's last post is going to be a picture of a vagisil tube,

NO. HELL NO.

REPUBLICANS ARE PLEADING SO PRESIDENT OBAMA DECLARES STATE OF EMERGENCY IN SEVERAL RED STATES SO THEY HAVE ACCESS TO THOSE SWEET SWEEET SWEEEEEEEEET FEDERAL EMERGENCY FUNDS.

i think it was something like: States cannot deal with the damage this storm may bring, we need the federal government.

small government huh??? lol

redivider said:

it was an additional responsibility bestowed upon the fire department by politicians who obviously care more about political rambling than public safety.

fighting fires is already dangerous enough. we need these guys to focus on putting fires out.

not on focusing on unneeded bureaucratic nonsense that only serves to put the public in danger.

this reaction by the fire department could've happened just as easily through clerical error. is $75 dollars really worth letting somebody lose their home??

again I ask: WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS COUNTRY TURNING INTO??

you think the first people to move here, back on those ships, would've survived with this individualistic, selfish point of view?? or do you think they made it through the tough north american winter by working together, through a sense of society???

Click to expand...

Im sure no Americans would be alive today if it weren't for the fire department putting out their house fire back in 1790.

Notice none of the man's neighbors showed up to act as a bucket brigade? No other FD out of the local area came either. Aren't you going to now talk shit about the neighbors and the other Fire Departments in the area for not having compassion? I wonder if he had fire insurance and rebuilt his home? Of course his possessions cannot be replaced, but if he Took a careful inventory I'm sure the Insurance company will remunerate him for a covered loss.

redivider said:

oh hell no. if you think my very awesome thread's last post is going to be a picture of a vagisil tube,

NO. HELL NO.

REPUBLICANS ARE PLEADING SO PRESIDENT OBAMA DECLARES STATE OF EMERGENCY IN SEVERAL RED STATES SO THEY HAVE ACCESS TO THOSE SWEET SWEEET SWEEEEEEEEET FEDERAL EMERGENCY FUNDS.

i think it was something like: States cannot deal with the damage this storm may bring, we need the federal government.

small government huh??? lol

Click to expand...

i dont really disagree with anything you just said, but i think the reason they declare early has something to do with being able to legally release certain resources like national guard/military equipment.

and if you are thinking that they want the fed to come in and have a wonderful relief effort like they did in katrina, you would be mistaken.

further, americans are the most generous people on the planet. if there were no funds available, and an emergency happened, there wouldnt be enough wheelbarrels available to carry the donations.

but there would be enough free loaders, who were told to evacuate, but didnt, standing around wating for the govt run water truck to arrive.

the rest of us would start cleaning up and rebuilding.

please dont make us go back and research things like the johnstown floods and other natural disasters to show you how americans react when confronted with disaster. it would just further prove you are an idiot.

we get tired of doing that

jeff f said:

...americans are the most generous people on the planet....

Click to expand...

not even close.

many other countries give more than americans per capita. i believe sweden leads the way, that bunch of atheists.

UncleBuck said:

not even close.

many other countries give more than americans per capita. i believe sweden leads the way, that bunch of atheists.

Click to expand...

the government of sweden may very well force its people to give more than ours does, but the people of the u.s. willingly give a higher percentage of the gdp than any other nation on earth. our closest competitor in that race gives only half of what our citizens do.

UncleBuck said:

not even close.

many other countries give more than americans per capita. i believe sweden leads the way, that bunch of atheists.

Click to expand...

if you want to believe the phoney UN type claculations. the ones that use GDP and some other nonsensical bullshit. but then again, you and mame love those charts.

go to any food pantry in the world and you will mostly see USA stickers on everything.

but then again, the french did donate tents for the bp oil spill.....fucking frog mothafuckas

undertheice said:

the government of sweden may very well force its people to give more than ours does, but the people of the u.s. willingly give a higher percentage of the gdp than any other nation on earth. our closest competitor in that race gives only half of what our citizens do.

Click to expand...

i have a sneaking suspicion he already knew this....he just loves self mutilation.

lol

yeah but it just goes to show that less federal intervention isn't always better.

and the scope of the katrina disaster couldn't be dealt with even if fema had the entire US economy at it's disposal. they could've handled it better, of course, but in hindsight everything seems crystal clear.... that wasn't the case when several thousand people were in serious danger...

i also hated how many people went out and looted just because the cops were busy doing something else... that just made things a whole lot worse for no reason....

jeff f said:

i have a sneaking suspicion he already knew this....he just loves self mutilation.

Click to expand...

earlier in the year i posted a link to the details of this fact, but the liberal ear seldom pays attention to anything that may alter its perception of our place in the world. to statist dupes, the u.s. and capitalism in general is about screwing everyone else and hoarding profits made on the backs of the poor. he is quite correct about sweden's place in the world of charity. what he fails to mention is that this is in terms of official development assistance, which is largely government sponsored. private sector giving is an entirely different matter.

redivider said:

yeah but it just goes to show that less federal intervention isn't always better.

Click to expand...

of course there is a place for federal intervention, but it is a matter of degree. just what would the point of financing a federal government be if all they did was ride around in private jets and molest interns? i would hope that, considering the massive amount of funds we provide the feds with, there would be some response to any major disaster. while the people themselves and their regional governments should bear the greatest burden of relief, that federal resources should be involved as necessary is only proper. this is, after all, a part of the duties of our government to protect the rights of the citizens to their lives and property. the problem with federal intervention is when, as in new orleans, local efforts are negligible and the bulk of the burden is expected to be placed on federal authorities.