only in relativity. weakness as a characteristic relies on a scale and there certainly isnt a
master scale that can ultimately judge a persons strength or worth, so a person can be physically weak, or spiritually weak, but a weak person does not exist.
...
the ppl that say "nobody has the right to judge another" or "nobody has the right to control anothers life" are almost always hypocrites. i notice when ppl make a big point to spell something out like that they dont actually
live how they are speaking. its like theyre sitting back and admiring it or something. hypocritical ppl are as socially useful as the mentally retarded. they follow circular reasoning, fueling counterproductive mindsets that serve no purpose but to slow the rate of evolution.
... i promise i am not stupid. u are the only person i have been arguing with in this thread for a little while now- i would not mistakenly put words in ur mouth. i did not accuse u of saying there is something morally wrong with dying.
mur·der
/ˈmɜr
dər/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[mur-der] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation noun 1.Law. the killing of another human being under conditions specifically covered in law.
like i said before, "murder" is a legal term. "murder" is bad by definition because it is part of a system that views it as bad. i have been making a point not to use the term "murder".
kill1
/kɪl/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[kil] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation verb (used with object) 1.to deprive of life in any manner; cause the death of; slay.
i have been using the term "kill".
now, if:
1: death is not bad
and
2: kill=cause the death of
then
3: killing is not bad.
what if he wanted to live? it doesnt matter. hes dead, his feelings arent hurt. what about the family left behind? not relevant. im not talking about the aftereffects. im talking about killing, not what happens when ppl find out about the killing.
but fuck, lets do this anyway. how bout i just restate what i posted a few pages back. what about the family? are u saying they would be sad? how do u kno? it might be a common result in society today but it is not an automatic result. they dont have to be sad. hell, they
might end up happier after hes gone u cant kno.
heymo, it doesnt get more simple than that.
how bout u prove to me how it is evil.
how bout u prove the existence of evilness.
how bout u prove the existence of true choice.
nothing fucking matters man.
is that a negative statement? really, if u dont any others, answer me that one.
(hey Skunkush, do u still deny my having BPD? really, the dualistic tendencies im showing here are staring me in the face)