Is it possible that NASA faked the moon landing?

Lmao @Dr.Pecker that's where they do testing on new vehicles and equipment. Just like astronauts practice underwater in their space suits. Same idea. The moon 1 rover is not the same rover that's on mars. Tho one used on devon island is much larger than the one on Mars. There's no secret about Devon island. It was publicly announced when the Mars research group set out to do testing.

We did go to the moon. The cold war ended in the 80's not in1969. Russia was at war with Iran before the cold war ended. We supplied weapons to Iran to combat Russia.

you didn't go to the moon in a Saturn 5 rocket, famous Nazi and first head of nasa werner von braun said ude need summin the dimension of the empire state building full of fuel or about 300 x what was on a Saturn 5, basically I don't dispute that weve been to the moon but not on a firecracker, ffs

hyroot said:

Lmao @Dr.Pecker that's where they do testing on new vehicles and equipment. Just like astronauts practice underwater in their space suits. Same idea. The moon 1 rover is not the same rover that's on mars. Tho one used on devon island is much larger than the one on Mars. There's no secret about Devon island. It was publicly announced when the Mars research group set out to do testing.

We did go to the moon. The cold war ended in the 80's not in1969. Russia was at war with Iran before the cold war ended. We supplied weapons to Iran to combat Russia.

Click to expand...

Let me guess your uncle worked at nasa. That place is so compartmentalized that the right hand doesn't even know what the left hand is doing. Just ask gus grissom

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3130017/Russian-official-demands-investigation-really-happened-moon-landing-original-footage-disappeared.html
Russia suggests America has NEVER landed on the moon and calls for 'an investigation into what really happened'

• Vladimir Markin has demanded an investigation into the moon landings
• Says its vital to find out what happened to original footage from 1969
• The footage was lost by Nasa who accidentally erased it in the 1980s
• The government official says it could reveal insights into space journeys

Dr.Pecker said:

Let me guess your uncle worked at nasa. That place is so compartmentalized that the right hand doesn't even know what the left hand is doing. Just ask gus grissom

Click to expand...

.

Yes. He was on the team designing the instrument / computers for the shuttles
He personally knew Gus Grissom, John Glenn, Alan Shepard and the rest of the mercury crew

Dr.Pecker said:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3130017/Russian-official-demands-investigation-really-happened-moon-landing-original-footage-disappeared.html
Russia suggests America has NEVER landed on the moon and calls for 'an investigation into what really happened'

• Vladimir Markin has demanded an investigation into the moon landings
• Says its vital to find out what happened to original footage from 1969
• The footage was lost by Nasa who accidentally erased it in the 1980s
• The government official says it could reveal insights into space journeys

Click to expand...

You believe what the Russian Govt says.. do you believe everything Kim Jong Un says too. .you do know the daily mail is a tabloid paper just like the enquirer and star

tyler.durden said:

I understand now that there is a possibility, however improbable. Sorry Reddan.

Click to expand...

It's OK mate. I know you're not inherently ignorant, it is the system you live in that perpetuates this attitude.

the moon hoax is an important part of the matrix control system, genuinely interested to debate with belivers as I am with religious people, but when a stoner with a spliff hanging out his gob can work out its a lie u have to marvel at the power of the control system when so many intelligent people are convinced A11 was real imo

reddan1981 said:

It's OK mate. I know you're not inherently ignorant, it is the system you live in that perpetuates this attitude.

Click to expand...

It is a sure sign one is bested when they feel the need to invent what their opponent writes. I don't find you as interesting as I once did, I now understand that your inability to accurately judge your own performance is tied to your inadequacy in judging others'. Perhaps it's not that you won't learn, it's that you're unable. Too bad, you could have been a contender...

Dr.Pecker said:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3130017/Russian-official-demands-investigation-really-happened-moon-landing-original-footage-disappeared.html
Russia suggests America has NEVER landed on the moon and calls for 'an investigation into what really happened'

• Vladimir Markin has demanded an investigation into the moon landings
• Says its vital to find out what happened to original footage from 1969
• The footage was lost by Nasa who accidentally erased it in the 1980s
• The government official says it could reveal insights into space journeys

Click to expand...

Articles from the Daily Mail? The trashy UK tabloid newspaper?! The next page probably had a riveting piece on celebrity baby names..

tyler.durden said:

It is a sure sign one is bested when they feel the need to invent what their opponent writes. I don't find you as interesting as I once did, I now understand that your inability to accurately judge your own performance is tied to your inadequacy in judging others'. Perhaps it's not that you won't learn, it's that your unable. Too bad, you could have been a contender...

Click to expand...

Your LOVE for yourself is apparent. Break this delusion of grandure Tyler. I was giving you a hint of humility, I'm actually embarrassed I credited you with intelligence.

reddan1981 said:

Your LOVE for yourself is apparent. Break this delusion of grandure Tyler. I was giving you a hint of humility, I'm actually embarrassed I credited you with intelligence.

Click to expand...

I like this post, and almost everything is spelled correctly. You are now a little more interesting. Don't blow it...

Today's Daily Mail front page news:





If that doesn't tickle your fancy, scroll down to find out what singer Rita Ora wore to a fish restaurant last night.


EDIT (Spoiler Alert!):

Ok, ok, I won't keep you in suspense. She wore a gold sequin dress. Thank you, Daily Mail.

the daily fail is indeed a piece of dogshit but its a logical fallacy to imply the moon landings were real cos the mail is shite, ad hominem is also logical fallacy lol those who use it lose it

zeddd said:

the daily fail is indeed a piece of dogshit but its a logical fallacy to imply the moon landings were real cos the mail is shite, ad hominem is also logical fallacy lol those who use it lose it

Click to expand...

We agree on something, but I don't think I implied that the lunar landings took place because the Daily Mail is dogshit. I simply dismiss certain 'sources' of information.

good for you the msm is full of bs, btw you took me for a div yet when I proved my point with mathematics you dismissed it without a mathematical retort or correction therefore your criticism of my equations is invalid

zeddd said:

good for you the msm is full of bs, btw you took me for a div yet when I proved my point with mathematics you dismissed it without a mathematical retort or correction therefore your criticism of my equations is invalid

Click to expand...

You're trying to reduce lunar descent thrust calculations to one simple equation - Newton's 2nd Law of Motion. If you think that's all it takes without applying other equations of motion (factoring in initial velocity, final velocity, trajectory, loss of mass due to fuel burnoff, and all the other kinematics you don't even know exist) then you are a 'div'.

I did have a mathematical retort, which does validate my criticism of your 'calculations'. I linked to it on a previous page but you've repeatedly chosen to ignore it. Your prerogative, I guess.

Armstrong himself said they had 30 seconds of fuel to burn to get that baby down, they talk about huge dust being blown around and the deafening noise/silence depending on which astro u believe, simple fact is u need way more than the 10, 000 ilbs they claimed it had, and werner von braun was he wrong about the amount of rocket fuel he used, you come across as someone who would never accept the evidence against something they believe in, a bit like individual religious belief and that's how I see the moon hoax, no problems at all with it but evidence points elsewhere imo

tyler.durden said:

I like this post, and almost everything is spelled correctly. You are now a little more interesting. Don't blow it...

Click to expand...

Your are the best. What does possible mean? (I left a little prezzie for you to clean or condescend me over, you're welcome brother).

zeddd said:

Armstrong himself said they had 30 seconds of fuel to burn to get that baby down, they talk about huge dust being blown around and the deafening noise/silence depending on which astro u believe, simple fact is u need way more than the 10, 000 ilbs they claimed it had, and werner von braun was he wrong about the amount of rocket fuel he used, you come across as someone who would never accept the evidence against something they believe in, a bit like individual religious belief and that's how I see the moon hoax, no problems at all with it but evidence points elsewhere imo

Click to expand...

I think you have me pegged all wrong - I'm more than happy to change my position, but only with sufficient evidence. I don't think any such evidence exists, let alone been offered up on this thread.

I believe (rightly or wrongly) that we did land on the moon. I've provided links to support the mathematical physics involved in such a feat. These calculations come from multiple sources have been peer-reviewed countless times. They're complex, not force = mass x acceleration, with respect.

Ironically, you come across as the type of person you're suggesting I am, unwavering in the face of overwhelming mathematical evidence. If you don't understand what's involved, it would be more reasonable for you to say:

"I don't understand the complexities involved as they've been presented to me, so I choose to believe the lunar landing is a hoax."

In keeping with your religious motif in the previous post, it was be tantamount to a "believer" saying "I don't understand the quantum theory surrounding the Big Bang, therefore I choose to believe that God created the universe."