Is Biden really that bad?

cannabineer said:

again you conflate violence with protest.

Click to expand...

It is the new standard not set by me. This is the part I'm supposed to mention the summer of love right wing talking point, correct?

Do you remember the Rittenhouse trial? Do you remember the smoking gun evidence that was presented from an FBI drone watching Kenosha burn?

Wasnt the bombshell that the FBI was watching and not that Kyle was shooting in self defense which was self evident?

See like it or not I will concede that a few bad apples don't spoil the bunch. You will not.. Like it or not the modern right is the only group that will still entertain all points of view. You will not.

We just found out that big tech and legacy media is actively working with dhs to suppress political opinion and dissent. This is the team you chose to carry water for.

ActionianJacksonian said:

Like it or not the modern right is the only group that will still entertain all points of view.

Click to expand...

They don’t entertain Black Lives Matter. Or abortion for raped women. Or immigration. What exactly do they entertain again? Oh an orange jackass

ActionianJacksonian said:

It is the new standard not set by me. This is the part I'm supposed to mention the summer of love right wing talking point, correct?

Do you remember the Rittenhouse trial? Do you remember the smoking gun evidence that was presented from an FBI drone watching Kenosha burn?

Wasnt the bombshell that the FBI was watching and not that Kyle was shooting in self defense which was self evident?

See like it or not I will concede that a few bad apples don't spoil the bunch. You will not.. Like it or not the modern right is the only group that will still entertain all points of view. You will not.

We just found out that big tech and legacy media is actively working with dhs to suppress political opinion and dissent. This is the team you chose to carry water for.

Click to expand...

Roske was not a protester.
Babbitt was not a protester.
Shooting to kill at someone who threw a plastic bag is not self-defense.
The modern right’s claims about the previous election make what you contend utter moo poo.

ActionianJacksonian said:

Hilarious! It was her neck though, but who cares about that veteran right? Please continue to focus on this issue and 3 others that don't even reach double digits of things all Americans across the spectrum give a damn about though. It's quite fulfilling to see how out of touch yall really are.

Click to expand...

You miss-spelled insurrectionist...right wing fascists are a real problem in America. Republicans need to stop their lies, it's getting people killed. Vote BLUE

ActionianJacksonian said:

Look at all that police brutality to keep them from exercising their right to protest. Why didn't kamala bail them out instead of keeping them in prison for the last 2 years on misdemeanor trespassing?

Isn't this the standard your team set buddy? When you "unleash the whirlwind" on the Supreme Court and protesters unlawfully gather outside their leaked home addresses because of a leaked draft decision to the point a literal assassin planned on killing one judges whole family while you,, the media and the administration supported this "right to protest" then this is the new standard.

Enjoy!

Click to expand...

You miss-spelled insurrection again....Those criminals broke into the US Capitol and attempted to overturn the legal election of the US President. They don't belong on the streets. Maybe we should treat them like a black man trying to use a fake $20

cannabineer said:

again you conflate violence with protest.

Click to expand...

This is understandable.

How Democrats protest



How Republicans Protest

Wattzzup said:

They don’t entertain Black Lives Matter. Or abortion for raped women. Or immigration. What exactly do they entertain again? Oh an orange jackass

Click to expand...

You are being purposely disingenuous on each of those issues.

It's well documented the BLM organization was a grift for mansions in high class white neighborhoods and millions and millions in donations to new startup transgender organizations that won't answer the phone or take a patient. Many are homes with business names where no business is conducted. They didn't even help George Floyd's room mates with the rent after he died. Left them to fend for themselves against eviction and George Floyd's car towing bills and fines. Blm loves one thing and it's property.

There is no jurisdiction that doesn't have an exemption for abortions for rape, incest or life threatening condition of mom, and they could if they wanted to. And Dobbs will allow blue states to expand access all the way until birth, like good happy eugenicists, just like RGB warned right?

And by immigration you mean illegal immigration. We have all seen what your side really thinks about this at Martha's vineyard, deported in 24hrs flat all the while being a sanctuary for immigration but no tolerance in their community for the unlawful type.

And on on on it goes, nothing but spin from your side with zero attempt at honest conversation.

ActionianJacksonian said:

… There is no jurisdiction that doesn't have an exemption for abortions for rape, incest or life threatening condition of mom, and they could if they wanted to.

Click to expand...

And on on on it goes, nothing but spin from your side with zero attempt at honest conversation.

Click to expand...

ActionianJacksonian said:

You are being purposely disingenuous on each of those issues.

It's well documented the BLM organization was a gift for mansions. They didn't even help George Floyd's room mates with the rent after he died.

There is no jurisdiction that doesn't have an exemption for abortions for rape, incest or life threatening condition of mom, and they could if they wanted to. And Dobbs will allow blue states to expand access all the way until birth, like good happy eugenicists, just like RGB warned right?

And by immigration you mean illegal immigration. We have all seen what your side really thinks about this at Martha's vineyard, deported in 24hrs flat all the while being a sanctuary for immigration but no tolerance in their community for the unlawful type.

And on on on it goes, nothing but spin from your side with zero attempt at honest conversation.

Click to expand...

The Texas Sheriff says the immigrants that the republicans illegally trafficked to Martha's Vineyard weren't illegal...they were crime victims...
Bexar County sheriff certifies that migrants flown to Martha’s Vineyard are crime victims, clearing path for special visas

cannabineer said:

Roske was not a protester.
Babbitt was not a protester.
Shooting to kill at someone who threw a plastic bag is not self-defense.
The modern right’s claims about the previous election make what you contend utter moo poo.

Click to expand...

Ah why even try with you when you are so devoid of facts? Grosskreutz was a convicted felon with an expired CWP who frew on an armed man who was being chased down by a mob and beaten with skateboards.

Did you not watch the trial buddy where Grosskreutz admitted he drew and pointed his illegal weapon at Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse fires a single shot?

I'm glad I could help you with real information as you go the the polls this November, every little bit helps.

cannabineer said:

View attachment 5222651

Click to expand...

Oh Vox(shudder), my favorite of the hard Left sites!

Let's pick a state. Florida:


"(IV) Unless requested by the woman, the person performing the ultrasound may not offer the opportunity to view the images and hear the explanation and the explanation may not be given if, at the time the woman schedules or arrives for her appointment to obtain an abortion, a copy of a restraining order, police report, medical record, or other court order or documentation is presented which provides evidence that the woman is

/* this section of FL statute failed to paste for whatever reason. most likely haste on my part */
obtaining the abortion because the woman is a victim of rape, incest, domestic violence, or human trafficking or that the woman has been diagnosed as having a condition that, on the basis of a physician’s good faith clinical judgment, would create a serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function if the woman delayed terminating her pregnancy."

Wanna bet the rest of the list is the same? Do me a favor and link the vox article the graphic came from and I bet I will read that this is vox interpretation of what could be one day maybe if democracy dies because Republicans voted.

// wrong quote before, apologies.

cannabineer said:

Roske was not a protester.
Babbitt was not a protester.
Shooting to kill at someone who threw a plastic bag is not self-defense.
The modern right’s claims about the previous election make what you contend utter moo poo.

Click to expand...

The Right's claims about the previous election pale in comparison to the Dems screeching claims to the same tune since at least 2000 when I started paying attention. So what of 1st ammendment protected claims either way?

Trump was illegitimate amirite? Dems motion to desertify the election every time a Republican is elected. It's public record buddy. Anyone can look. What was so different about 2020 though? Oh right. Unlike the Dem attempts over the previous decades that bitch actually had Senator sponsorship for the motions.

But let's just look at what's verifiable for you to see if you choose to look at it. Mola v Biden has already proved that dhs and fbi worked on behalf of the administration to censor unfavorable news content during the election cycle and its not even really going yet! Of these news stories that were censored and, are and always have been verifiable, when polled to Dems 17% said these stories would have swayed their vote to Republican.

Conspiracy theory! Russian disinformation!

Nope, just verifiable forensic digital data complete with Metadata on both ends actually.

So the difference in a conspiracy theory and the truth these days is about 6 months to a year after an election.

LOL

ActionianJacksonian said:

Oh Vox(shudder), my favorite of the hard Left sites!

Let's pick a state. Florida:


"(IV) Unless requested by the woman, the person performing the ultrasound may not offer the opportunity to view the images and hear the explanation and the explanation may not be given if, at the time the woman schedules or arrives for her appointment to obtain an abortion, a copy of a restraining order, police report, medical record, or other court order or documentation is presented which provides evidence that the woman is

Wanna bet the rest of the list is the same? Do me a favor and link the vox article the graphic came from and I bet I will read that this is vox interpretation of what could be one day maybe if democracy dies because Republicans voted.

Click to expand...

Vox is better than the sites you like to pick. Their factuality rates High, unlike say Brownstone Institute you like to quote.

Your quote is truncated to meaninglessness, and you did not provide the link.

cannabineer said:

Vox is better than the sites you like to pick. Their factuality rates High, unlike say Brownstone Institute you like to quote.

Your quote is truncated to meaninglessness, and you did not provide the link.

Vox - Bias and Credibility

LEFT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Click to expand...

All hail vox. Really? Just FL is bunk, the rest obviously are.

I'm sorry, you provided a link where? That's Florida's statutory text that relates to the linkless graphic you posted by a hard left propaganda site dude.

It's being challenged in the FL Supreme Court. Quite easy to find. Much easier than the site search or reverse image lookup I would need to perform to obtain that link I asked you for that you will not provide.

ActionianJacksonian said:

I'm sorry, you provided a link where? That's Florida's statutory text that relates to the linkless graphic you posted by a hard left propaganda site dude.

It's being challenged in the FL Supreme Court. Quite easy to find. Much easier than the site search or reverse image lookup I would need to perform to obtain that link I asked you for that you will not provide.

Click to expand...

try clicking on it. Works for me.
Vox article pops right up on search “abortion illegal rape”.

cannabineer said:

try clicking on it. Works for me.
Vox article pops right up on search “abortion illegal rape”.

Click to expand...

Post 7338 correct? I see nothing but an attachment. Please hold my hand through this and be my guide.

cannabineer said:

try clicking on it. Works for me.
Vox article pops right up on search “abortion illegal rape”.

Click to expand...

Also, please research the new MUM algorithm! Try your search with other engines and see what you get buddy!

Jesus christ, so many words, settle down.

So let me research the link I asked for on my own:


First paragraph:

"The case of a 10-year-old Ohio rape survivor who traveled to Indiana to obtain an abortion drew national attention to Ohio’s near-total abortion ban, which does not allow abortions even in cases of rape or incest."

"

• Health plans offered in the state’s health exchange under the Affordable Care Act can only cover abortion in cases of life endangerment, or in cases of rape or incest.
• Abortion is covered in insurance policies for public employees only in cases of life endangerment, rape or incest."

So who is correct here, Ohio or Vox? FL or Vox? The 10 year old girl was additionally covered under Ohio law for "irreparable harm" to her child body.

But does the ultra hard right fascist threat to democracy crowd want a disinformation branch of the Federal government to combat this?

No. We want to talk and let the best information float effortlessly to the top like nice cream.

ActionianJacksonian said:

Post 7338 correct? I see nothing but an attachment. Please hold my hand through this and be my guide.

Click to expand...

No.