you call AGW a "hoax".
says the guy who is now parroting kynes' "feels" spam verbatim.
Actually, that was the claim from Nasa. I heard it repeated on numerous newscasts and included in every article about their current claim.
I just simply put it in perspective.
And many RIU members recognize those member's delusions as an indicator of mental instability AND unfettered ignorance with a healthy dash of naïveté.Many RIU members recognize your delusions as an indicator of mental instability.
Are you talking about RIU's Nazi-hunting guard-chihuahua?Many RIU members recognize your delusions as an indicator of mental instability.
That's one of the ironies of intense calculus; one can solve mind-boggling Navier-Stokes equations with the grace of a pro-fencer but lose track of how to do things like simple long-division.
You specifically claimed, "since we have been keeping records or 1/333,000,000th of the earth's existence". Citation required.
He cited the NASA website. Are you claiming it isnt there?
He cited? He copy pasted an unrelated sentence from gawd knows where. He specifically claimed "since we have been keeping records or 1/333,000,000th of the earth's existence".
Obviously hyperbole indeed. In fact, I see nothing but hyperbole from the science denial crowd, including yourself. Despite what scienceofdoom says, I won't be abandoning the findings of climate scientists that 2014 was the hottest year on record. Your incessant and over-worded hyperbole is starting to remind me of Dr Kynes, since you so clearly think you know more than everyone here such that you don't have to make proper citations for your claims regarding science (I don't care if you have a PhD, you are not arguing from authority). How about instead of your ad hominems toward UncleBuck in your response to my argument, you expect your hyperbole to be treated like hyperbole when I remind you that your citations are crap or nonexistent.
Just out of curiosity, how much hotter was 2014 than the previous record temperature? Was it in line with the IPCC model's predictions?
Just out of curiosity, how could there be a hiatus if 14 of the 15 hottest years on record occurred in this century? I'll tell you how, cherry-picked data. You have already demonstrated that you think that the slow in the rate of temperature rise is the same as temperature drop. When scientists PREDICT that it is going to get hotter and it does get hotter, nay-sayers such as yourself shout HIATUS!
You do understand basic division, yes? I know a certain ignored member that has real trouble with basic math, but you?
I don't see a proper peer reviewed study which shows that such a vast body of research gathered from ice cores and geological survey ought to be abandoned in favor of your assertion that there only exists data from the last 135 years regarding climate and greenhouse gas levels.
