Impeach Now, Or Face the End of Constitutional Democracy

420worshipper said:
Keira Knightly settles Lawsuit against British Paper
Celebrity News - Knightley settles libel lawsuit

'Hell's Kitchen' chef Gordon Ramsay settles British libel lawsuit
'Hell's Kitchen' chef Gordon Ramsay settles British tabloid libel lawsuit - Reality TV World - News, information, episode summaries, message boards, chat and games for unscripted television programs


Cameron Diaz settles lawsuit against British paper The Sun
Cameron Diaz Settles Suit with British Tabloid - Cameron Diaz : People.com

Robbie Williams and his 'gay' libel victory
David Rowan: Media: Robbie Williams and his 'gay' libel victory (Evening Standard)

Just to name a few. And you have no proof that election fraud took place. Was any charges filed? Was anybody found guilty of election fraud? Did anybody go to prison? No, because there was no election fraud. If you have credible evidence linking any persons to election fraud present it to proper authorities. And this will be my last post to you. Seems you are too ignorant of people presenting facts to you because they make you look like an idiot. Since you can't find the evidence and present your own opinions about the facts. I don't see a need to carry on a conversation with somebody who parrots anothers opinion. Since the only evidence you've ever presented was news storys with others opinions and labeled them facts!

POLLY WANT A FREAKING CRACKER!!!! DUMBASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...


Again you're talking out your ass on the election fraud ... you can't prove the election wasn't stolen .... all you can do is quote some bullshit that doesn't address the issue of fraud ... still waiting for you to dispute ANY FACTS in Kennedy's article in Rolling Stone ... and we all know why you won't ... BECAUSE YOU CAN'T ... and until you do ... you will always look like the dumbass you are on this issue ... Bwaa ha ha ha ha ...

I post an article from an investigative report with the BBC and you put up some shit about the tabloids... wow ... what an idiot .... you seem to keep supporting that you are ... an idiot .... he compares the BBC with the TABLOIDS .... close .... but no cigar!!

Bwaaa ha ha ha .... Polly having fun making you look like a fool! .... and you prove the point that you can't get away with saying something that isn't true .... even the tabloids. Any lawsuit against the BBC for the election fraud stories? Hummmmm?:hump:

Why I have plenty of proof election fraud took place ... you are just too stupid to compehrend it and yes ... charges has been file .... people have been convicted ... but not the master minds .... the are plenty of lawsuits ... 15 against Blackwell alone ... and convictions .... here a couple .... I won't waste too much time on a dummy like you .... just to show the folks at home what a complete ass you are on this issue ...
[URL="http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticleNew.asp?xfile=data/theworld/2006/May/theworld_May644.xml&section=theworld"]Former Bush campaign official sentenced to prison [/URL]
A senior official in US President George W. Bush’s re-election campaign was sentenced to 10 months in prison on Wednesday for his role in suppressing votes in a key US Senate race, a scandal that Democrats charge may involve the White House.
[URL="http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/04/11/ohio-poll-workers-indicted-for-fudging-2004-recount/"]Ohio poll workers indicted for fudging 2004 recount[/URL]

Dummy! .... dummy .... dummy!!! .... continues to show you are stupid on this issue ... still trying to talk to the small minded are we? Bwaaa ha ha ha ... :mrgreen:
 
This will be my last comment growrebel because you are an idiot who never read the facts. You keep saying that I can't prove the election wasn't stolen. And I have since the Constitution of the United States says you need 270 electorial college votes to win and be president. You just have your head up your ass and refuse to read the constitution after I put it here several times. And your quote was...
<QUOTE>
unlike american MSM it's a crime in England to print a story that isn't true
</QUOTE>
So I showed you where British papers printed untruths. And for your information the BBC is a television station and not a newspaper. But your comment was just the above and nothing more. "A CRIME IN ENGLAND TO PRINT A STORY THAT ISN'T TRUE". Now I know you will say you never said that, and then resort to name calling because I proved you wrong yet again.
And now to support your case for election fraud in the presidential election you put up something about a senatorial election. Again nothing to do with the Presidential elections. Since you have no concept of how a president is elected you making comments on them show how truly ignorant you are. There have been several people in this thread that have said my facts were correct and you were putting up news reporters opinions of them. And you are calling news reports facts shows you are truly too stupid to carry on an intelligent political conversation with so to the IGNORE LIST you go. Because I can't stomach talking with people that are ignorant and small minded to resort to profanity and name calling when they are proven wrong.

POLLY YOU ARE TOO IGNORANT AND SMALL MINDED FOR A CRACKER NOW!!!
 
420worshipper said:
This will be my last comment growrebel because you are an idiot who never read the facts. You keep saying that I can't prove the election wasn't stolen. And I have since the Constitution of the United States says you need 270 electorial college votes to win and be president. You just have your head up your ass and refuse to read the constitution after I put it here several times. And your quote was...
<QUOTE>
unlike american MSM it's a crime in England to print a story that isn't true
</QUOTE>
So I showed you where British papers printed untruths. And for your information the BBC is a television station and not a newspaper. But your comment was just the above and nothing more. "A CRIME IN ENGLAND TO PRINT A STORY THAT ISN'T TRUE". Now I know you will say you never said that, and then resort to name calling because I proved you wrong yet again.
And now to support your case for election fraud in the presidential election you put up something about a senatorial election. Again nothing to do with the Presidential elections. Since you have no concept of how a president is elected you making comments on them show how truly ignorant you are. There have been several people in this thread that have said my facts were correct and you were putting up news reporters opinions of them. And you are calling news reports facts shows you are truly too stupid to carry on an intelligent political conversation with so to the IGNORE LIST you go. Because I can't stomach talking with people that are ignorant and small minded to resort to profanity and name calling when they are proven wrong.

POLLY YOU ARE TOO IGNORANT AND SMALL MINDED FOR A CRACKER NOW!!!
Click to expand...


No ... I'm saying you can't prove the election wasn't stolen BECAUSE YOU CAN'T DISPUTE ONE FACT IN KENNEDY'S REPORT ... that's why ... you keep posting bullshit about the electoral college instead of addressing the report.

Bwaaa ha ha ha go ahead dumbass put me on ignore ... keep talking that parrot shit ... most can see it's YOU who is a parrot!

Go home to your mama! "Mommy! .... that mean woman won't listen to my bullshit! HA HA HA:blsmoke:
 
More on the elections:

[SIZE=+1]UC Berkeley prof proves Bush stole election!!![/SIZE]
University of California at Berkeley ^ | 11/18/2004 | Michael Hout

Posted on 11/18/2004 1:17:42 PM PST by ArcLight

Summary:
- Irregularities associated with electronic voting machines may have awarded 130,000 excess votes or more to President George W. Bush in Florida.
- Compared to counties with paper ballots, counties with electronic voting machines were significantly more likely to show increases in support for President Bush between 2000 and 2004. This effect cannot be explained by differences between counties in income, number of voters, change in voter turnout, or size of Hispanic/Latino population.
- In Broward County alone, President Bush appears to have received approximately 72,000 excess votes. - We can be 99.9% sure that these effects are not attributable to chance.

(Excerpt) Read more at ucdata.berkeley.edu ...
 
GRAND THEFT AMERICA,,,,,,,,,,election fraud 1-A..............Bush Stole the 2000 Election.....................CNN.com - Bill Press: More evidence Bush stole the election - July 23, 2001..............How much more will it take for you to wake the fuck up. Bush is an illegal president installed by republican clones in florida. He started an illegal war and is trying to destroy out democracy, does the # 666 come to mind. There are also theories about this..................George W Bush is the AntiChrist
 
medicineman said:
GRAND THEFT AMERICA,,,,,,,,,,election fraud 1-A..............Bush Stole the 2000 Election.....................CNN.com - Bill Press: More evidence Bush stole the election - July 23, 2001..............How much more will it take for you to wake the fuck up. Bush is an illegal president installed by republican clones in florida. He started an illegal war and is trying to destroy out democracy, does the # 666 come to mind. There are also theories about this..................George W Bush is the AntiChrist
Click to expand...

Wow more people putting ridiculious links about how the president who was elected according to the United States Constitution stole the election. Well these idiots you put up here med are completely ignorant of the process of electing a president. So I put the truth and showed how according to the constitution a president is elected. All these people are saying that he didn't win the election because he didn't win the popular (peoples) votes. Funny, but thats not how the president is elected in the United States. And no matter what anybody says, we elect all Federal Officials according to the Constitution. Now why is it that nobody argued that Bill Clinton didn't win the election when he didn't win popular (peoples) vote. How come the Republican candidate President George H.W. Bush didn't cry and whine like a little bitch? Just like democrats have been doing for 8 years. The reason why, is because he knew like all other republicans and anybody intelligent enough to read the Constitution. He was elected President of The United States according to the Constitution of The United States since the very first president (George Washington) was elected.
So unless you want to throw out the Constitution, live with how it says that we elect presidents. And we all know how it turns out when you want to throw out the constitution and get rid of elected officials in Washington D.C.
Does Ruby Ridge ring a bell for you? It happened during President Clintons 8 years in office. And what happens if a Democrat wins the election for President in 2008 by winning majority of electorial college votes 270+, and not win the most popular (peoples) votes. Do you think the Republican candidate will whine and cry? Do you think that media agencies that you've posted will cry fowl? No, I think not to both questions. The Republican candidate will know that the Democrat was elected according to the Constitution of The United States. And media agencies will say whats good for them is good for us! And so will people like you that says election fraud. Please wake up and read the Constitution. I've put plenty of links for it and will put one more for you... Index Page - The U.S. Constitution Online - USConstitution.net . Then make sure to go to Article 2 on how the President is elected... The United States Constitution - The U.S. Constitution Online - USConstitution.net .
And the part about George Bush being the Anti-Christ is just ridiculous. Most people who claim people are the anti-christ can't answer this one question.
Where in the Book of Revelations does the word anti-christ appear? Simple answer, ITS NOT EVEN USED ONE TIME IN THAT BOOK. And hate to tell you that doesn't fall under a political category. It falls under idiotic non-bible reading conspiracy lunatics.
 
420worshipper said:
Wow more people putting ridiculious links about how the president who was elected according to the United States Constitution stole the election. Well these idiots you put up here med are completely ignorant of the process of electing a president. So I put the truth and showed how according to the constitution a president is elected. All these people are saying that he didn't win the election because he didn't win the popular (peoples) votes. Funny, but thats not how the president is elected in the United States. And no matter what anybody says, we elect all Federal Officials according to the Constitution. Now why is it that nobody argued that Bill Clinton didn't win the election when he didn't win popular (peoples) vote. How come the Republican candidate President George H.W. Bush didn't cry and whine like a little bitch? Just like democrats have been doing for 8 years. The reason why, is because he knew like all other republicans and anybody intelligent enough to read the Constitution. He was elected President of The United States according to the Constitution of The United States since the very first president (George Washington) was elected.
So unless you want to throw out the Constitution, live with how it says that we elect presidents. And we all know how it turns out when you want to throw out the constitution and get rid of elected officials in Washington D.C.
Does Ruby Ridge ring a bell for you? It happened during President Clintons 8 years in office. And what happens if a Democrat wins the election for President in 2008 by winning majority of electorial college votes 270+, and not win the most popular (peoples) votes. Do you think the Republican candidate will whine and cry? Do you think that media agencies that you've posted will cry fowl? No, I think not to both questions. The Republican candidate will know that the Democrat was elected according to the Constitution of The United States. And media agencies will say whats good for them is good for us! And so will people like you that says election fraud. Please wake up and read the Constitution. I've put plenty of links for it and will put one more for you... Index Page - The U.S. Constitution Online - USConstitution.net . Then make sure to go to Article 2 on how the President is elected... The United States Constitution - The U.S. Constitution Online - USConstitution.net .
And the part about George Bush being the Anti-Christ is just ridiculous. Most people who claim people are the anti-christ can't answer this one question.
Where in the Book of Revelations does the word anti-christ appear? Simple answer, ITS NOT EVEN USED ONE TIME IN THAT BOOK. And hate to tell you that doesn't fall under a political category. It falls under idiotic non-bible reading conspiracy lunatics.
Click to expand...
Geeze mellow out. I guess you didn't read any of those links, eh? Yeah I know Jeb bush pulled it off for Bush, so what, it was still illegal. Since when did we allow someones brother to make someone the president with cronyism. All the key players in this fiasco were repukes, a repuke ring of conspirators to fix the election. sounds like some South American countrys elections, throwing out 57,000 votes and having Bush's campaign director certify the election, after his brother picked the electors, wow some kind of democracy in action. eh?Just think how many people (US soldiers) would be alive now if the election would have been fair. You repukes that-think this was allright would be screaming to high heaven if the election had been fixed the other way , so shut the fuck up and just realize that Bush was elected illegally with underhanded cronyism. Yeah we know how the constitution works and we also know this was very crooked, Jeb slamed the deal with his 25 hand picked repukes after making sure the popular vote was fixed. So go eat poop.
 
Hate to tell you but I'm not republican, nor did I vote for Bush either time. And it works both ways you do realize that don't you. No voters determine who the electorial college voters are. The governors of each state decide that. And a Democratic governor will pick his friends from the Democratic Party in his state. This way, he can be sure of which way they vote. And since there is only six states that require e.c. voters by law to vote for who the citizens pick in a majority. Your problem is with the states themselves. Vote for State Senators and Governors that will change state laws to make e.c. voters vote for who the citizens of the state want elected. But until that happens, Democrats will pick Democrats, and Republicans will pick Republicans. And yes I did read everything on the links you put up. I wouldn't comment before I read them.
 
medicineman said:
Geeze mellow out. I guess you didn't read any of those links, eh? Yeah I know Jeb bush pulled it off for Bush, so what, it was still illegal. Since when did we allow someones brother to make someone the president with cronyism. All the key players in this fiasco were repukes, a repuke ring of conspirators to fix the election. sounds like some South American countrys elections, throwing out 57,000 votes and having Bush's campaign director certify the election, after his brother picked the electors, wow some kind of democracy in action. eh?Just think how many people (US soldiers) would be alive now if the election would have been fair. You repukes that-think this was allright would be screaming to high heaven if the election had been fixed the other way , so shut the fuck up and just realize that Bush was elected illegally with underhanded cronyism. Yeah we know how the constitution works and we also know this was very crooked, Jeb slamed the deal with his 25 hand picked repukes after making sure the popular vote was fixed. So go eat poop.
Click to expand...
Having a relative that is also in politics is not illegal. Look at the Kennedy Klan.
 
This has been one of the better threads to appear in the forum, IMO. 420 has given everyone a good lesson in how the our federal elections are controlled by the Constitution. Excellent job 420! I suggest that all those who are still in doubt about Bush's last election win obtain a copy of the Constitution and keep it by their computer for reference before posting their nonsense. If you can't afford to buy a copy, Email your Congressman and ask for a copy. Most of them mail them out free of charge. Well, not exacty free ... like every other goodie provided "free" by the government ... they are paid for by your tax dollars.

Vi
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Ron Paul: “The PATRIOT Act Was Written Many, Many Years Before 9/11
Replies
19
Views
1K
Smirgen
Smirgen
dukeanthony
SO Some Say Farrakhan is Right?
2
Replies
24
Views
1K
sync0s
sync0s
deprave
  • Locked
O-Baaaaaaaaa-maaaaaaaaaaaa!
4 5 6
Replies
118
Views
7K
UncleBuck
UncleBuck
P
REPOST: Iran (Smuggler welcome to reply)
Replies
17
Views
2K
spliffbazz
spliffbazz
CrackerJax
9/11 debunking accomplished
13 14 15
Replies
281
Views
15K
snail240
S
Back
Top