"If you do not believe in climate change, you should not be allowed to hold public office"

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Or maybe they built the road too low....
Its too low now. It wasn't when the road was built, like, 50 years ago. What they are doing is raising roads and installing pumps. It will work for a while. A process that might have taken thousands of years is happening in less than a hundred.

He is, though, under no illusions about the long-term fate of the region he calls home.

“We’re putting enough heat in the ocean to send water over us, no question,” Dr. Stoddard said. “Ultimately, we give up and we leave. That’s how the story ends.”
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Its too low now. It wasn't when the road was built, like, 50 years ago. What they are doing is raising roads and installing pumps. It will work for a while. A process that might have taken thousands of years is happening in less than a hundred.

He is, though, under no illusions about the long-term fate of the region he calls home.

“We’re putting enough heat in the ocean to send water over us, no question,” Dr. Stoddard said. “Ultimately, we give up and we leave. That’s how the story ends.”
Maybe the road sank...
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Show your numbers to justify your theory or post a link.

The theory you put forth is that all the rising CO2 in the atmosphere is due to earth warming. So, what is causing global temperature rise and how can you justify the rise in CO2 over the past hundred or so years. Where is it coming from? Not fossil fuels?
I don't recall saying people don't contribute to atmospheric CO2 levels through use of fossil fuels or otherwise, so I deny saying such; as you're implying I did.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Must be the orbital cycle. Those just started happening about a hundred years ago.
Another one (possibly related, who knows?) I was thinking about was the frequency of the solar system as it orbits the center of the Milky Way...I think we could all agree black holes are basically flat and that the center of the frequency would have some sort of gravitational effect, maybe not.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Another one (possibly related, who knows?) I was thinking about was the frequency of the solar system as it orbits the center of the Milky Way...I think we could all agree black holes are basically flat and that the center of the frequency would have some sort of gravitational effect, maybe not.
you live in a trailer and make less than poverty, cuck. you're not gonna disprove manmade global warming. give up.

swastika-bike.gif
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Rising sea levels have killed and displaced millions already and will continue to kill more. Global warming has tipped the balance and most glaciers around the world are melting. The one atop Mt Kilimanjaro is already gone.
Wage war on the sea then. What you're saying is that we killed those people with our "pollution" of CO2 indirectly by causing the temps that "rose the seas"...which you can't prove.
On the other hand its easily demonstrated that rising temps then rising CO2 levels produce more food and cause it to grow in more places.

Yall also like to simply dismiss someone as a "climate change denier" as if even the most skeptical person would deny the climate always has changed, is changing; and always will.

So glaciers were always there, until the humans came along and drove a car and shipped goods via freight liner. Is that what you're sticking with?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Wage war on the sea then. What you're saying is that we killed those people with our "pollution" of CO2 indirectly by causing the temps that "rose the seas"...which you can't prove.
On the other hand its easily demonstrated that rising temps then rising CO2 levels produce more food and cause it to grow in more places.

Yall also like to simply dismiss someone as a "climate change denier" as if even the most skeptical person would deny the climate always has changed, is changing; and always will.

So glaciers were always there, until the humans came along and drove a car and shipped goods via freight liner. Is that what you're sticking with?
^^^full on retard meltdown^^^
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
So tell us Mr Genius, exactly how can it be that we humans put hundreds of millions of tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as a result of fossil fuel use- and have it NOT affect global temperatures?
I don't recall saying that fossil fuels haven't contributed to CO2 levels or that it wasn't involved with a cause-effect relationship with temps. What I have always maintained it that it isn't really significant compared to nature or cause for alarm from alarmists, like yourself.

You have to let the sugar chrystalize to add weight.
Of course. Makes the sticky icky good good.

People aren't praying hard enough to reverse the effects of AGW.

Here is a tool to see what areas in FLA will experience with sea level rise.

http://geology.com/sea-level-rise/florida.shtml
So where on the tool is the option for >50cm sea level rise by the end of the century? Bearing in mind that fossil fuels have passed peak production of course. Sky I think you safe for at least 84 more years.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I don't recall saying that fossil fuels haven't contributed to CO2 levels or that it wasn't involved with a cause-effect relationship with temps. What I have always maintained it that it isn't really significant compared to nature or cause for alarm from alarmists, like yourself.
So I hope we agree that the last interglacial period was over 120k years ago. Sea level rise was like 20 ft higher than now and that many more glaciers were melted then.
And of course it's a completely insignificant detail that YOU'RE ALIVE TO SEE IT HAPPENING AGAIN?

Unfuckingbelievable.
 
Top