"If you do not believe in climate change, you should not be allowed to hold public office"

NLXSK1 said:
Or maybe they built the road too low....
Click to expand...
Its too low now. It wasn't when the road was built, like, 50 years ago. What they are doing is raising roads and installing pumps. It will work for a while. A process that might have taken thousands of years is happening in less than a hundred.

He is, though, under no illusions about the long-term fate of the region he calls home.

“We’re putting enough heat in the ocean to send water over us, no question,” Dr. Stoddard said. “Ultimately, we give up and we leave. That’s how the story ends.”
 
Fogdog said:
Its too low now. It wasn't when the road was built, like, 50 years ago. What they are doing is raising roads and installing pumps. It will work for a while. A process that might have taken thousands of years is happening in less than a hundred.

He is, though, under no illusions about the long-term fate of the region he calls home.

“We’re putting enough heat in the ocean to send water over us, no question,” Dr. Stoddard said. “Ultimately, we give up and we leave. That’s how the story ends.”
Click to expand...

Maybe the road sank...
 
Fogdog said:
Show your numbers to justify your theory or post a link.

The theory you put forth is that all the rising CO2 in the atmosphere is due to earth warming. So, what is causing global temperature rise and how can you justify the rise in CO2 over the past hundred or so years. Where is it coming from? Not fossil fuels?
Click to expand...

I don't recall saying people don't contribute to atmospheric CO2 levels through use of fossil fuels or otherwise, so I deny saying such; as you're implying I did.
 
Fogdog said:
Must be the orbital cycle. Those just started happening about a hundred years ago.
Click to expand...

Another one (possibly related, who knows?) I was thinking about was the frequency of the solar system as it orbits the center of the Milky Way...I think we could all agree black holes are basically flat and that the center of the frequency would have some sort of gravitational effect, maybe not.
 
twostrokenut said:
Another one (possibly related, who knows?) I was thinking about was the frequency of the solar system as it orbits the center of the Milky Way...I think we could all agree black holes are basically flat and that the center of the frequency would have some sort of gravitational effect, maybe not.
Click to expand...

you live in a trailer and make less than poverty, cuck. you're not gonna disprove manmade global warming. give up.

swastika-bike.gif
 
ttystikk said:
Rising sea levels have killed and displaced millions already and will continue to kill more. Global warming has tipped the balance and most glaciers around the world are melting. The one atop Mt Kilimanjaro is already gone.
Click to expand...

Wage war on the sea then. What you're saying is that we killed those people with our "pollution" of CO2 indirectly by causing the temps that "rose the seas"...which you can't prove.
On the other hand its easily demonstrated that rising temps then rising CO2 levels produce more food and cause it to grow in more places.

Yall also like to simply dismiss someone as a "climate change denier" as if even the most skeptical person would deny the climate always has changed, is changing; and always will.

So glaciers were always there, until the humans came along and drove a car and shipped goods via freight liner. Is that what you're sticking with?
 
twostrokenut said:
Wage war on the sea then. What you're saying is that we killed those people with our "pollution" of CO2 indirectly by causing the temps that "rose the seas"...which you can't prove.
On the other hand its easily demonstrated that rising temps then rising CO2 levels produce more food and cause it to grow in more places.

Yall also like to simply dismiss someone as a "climate change denier" as if even the most skeptical person would deny the climate always has changed, is changing; and always will.

So glaciers were always there, until the humans came along and drove a car and shipped goods via freight liner. Is that what you're sticking with?
Click to expand...

^^^full on retard meltdown^^^
 
ttystikk said:
So tell us Mr Genius, exactly how can it be that we humans put hundreds of millions of tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as a result of fossil fuel use- and have it NOT affect global temperatures?
Click to expand...

I don't recall saying that fossil fuels haven't contributed to CO2 levels or that it wasn't involved with a cause-effect relationship with temps. What I have always maintained it that it isn't really significant compared to nature or cause for alarm from alarmists, like yourself.

schuylaar said:
You have to let the sugar chrystalize to add weight.
Click to expand...

Of course. Makes the sticky icky good good.

Fogdog said:
People aren't praying hard enough to reverse the effects of AGW.

Here is a tool to see what areas in FLA will experience with sea level rise.

http://geology.com/sea-level-rise/florida.shtml
Click to expand...

So where on the tool is the option for >50cm sea level rise by the end of the century? Bearing in mind that fossil fuels have passed peak production of course. Sky I think you safe for at least 84 more years.
 
twostrokenut said:
I don't recall saying that fossil fuels haven't contributed to CO2 levels or that it wasn't involved with a cause-effect relationship with temps. What I have always maintained it that it isn't really significant compared to nature or cause for alarm from alarmists, like yourself.
Click to expand...
twostrokenut said:
So I hope we agree that the last interglacial period was over 120k years ago. Sea level rise was like 20 ft higher than now and that many more glaciers were melted then.
Click to expand...
And of course it's a completely insignificant detail that YOU'RE ALIVE TO SEE IT HAPPENING AGAIN?

Unfuckingbelievable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top