i think i might be quitting

Status
Not open for further replies.

bu$hleaguer

Well-Known Member
Bu$h i always used to hate you when i first started reading your posts years ago. (The vulgarity) But since then i really think your hilarious man. I have a lot of respect for you, ya seem like a really stand up mostly moral and ethical individual. I was also disappointed when your fuck my balls thread got deleted. Cheers to you.
Hey cheers to you too dude! Sorry you hated me back in the day- at least you never really made me feel like you hated me, I didn't even know tbh.

I haven't read any of this shit going on but I know something's amiss- I find if I start to get bothered about shit on here I just disappear, I'm too busy in real life to worry about the make believe- but I hope you're all good, bud.
 

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
I was gifted 5 big red 60mg oxy's last night. Cut a 1/4 of one in half (1/8 )and ate it last night. (to make sure it wasn't poison...lol.) Gave the remaining 4.875 to a buddy with a perc script this morning...shit made me feel too damn good...had to get rid of it.
Careful, with no tolerance, 60-80mg will be enough to put you under the dirt, especially with a potentiator.
 

whitebb2727

Well-Known Member
To be clear in my profession everyone was pretty darn professional. It's just when people are dying left, right and sideways in front of you you have no time for Ms. Manner's bullshit and you did not worry about hurting feelings. You rarely, if ever, went personal or gratuitously mean. You had to take criticism on the fly very well. Criticism saved lives.

However if someone else got personal first it was fire at will or whatever their name was.
I can understand that. My father was an EMT/ firefighter/ first responder for over 30 years
Just so. It is about results and not feelings.

There is a basic difference between assailing someone's facts and assailing someone's person. Assailing someone's facts, when done honestly and not for undisclosed gain, is a service. It is very uncomfy though. I have more than once deliberately blurred the line between facts and my feelings in order to get out of having my facts questioned. It didn't help me, and it didn't respect the person bringing me my fail so that I might do it better.
Sticks and stones.

I can remove myself from my feelings. Some can not.

I don't mean to brag but I get bored in life. I'm good at everything I do. Its actually a curse to be honest.

I got a friend that's similar. We argue all the time. It happens with intelligent people.

I admit that I am wrong from time to time. It erks me when a person fails to realize that.

Like a thread the other day bashing a seed bank. Dude was treated fairly and he didn't think so. 20 people told him he was wrong.

If 20 people told me I was wrong about something I would have a gut check and look long and hard in the mirror to figure out where my fallacy and short comings were.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I can understand that. My father was an EMT/ firefighter/ first reoonder for over 30 years

Sticks and stones.

I can remove myself from my feelings. Some can not.

I don't mean to brag but I get bored in life. I'm good at everything I do. Its actually a curse to be honest.

I got a friend that's similar. We argue all the time. It happens with intelligent people.

I admit that I am wrong from time to time. It erks me when a person fails to realize that.

Like a thread the other day bashing a seed bank. Dude was treated fairly and he didn't think so. 20 people told him he was wrong.

If 20 people told me I was wrong about something I would have a gut check and look long and hard in the mirror to figure out where my fallacy and short comings were.
You're safe with me in that regard. I'll always realize when you admit you are wrong. Even when you don't. Part of the service.

And yes, that is the joy AND pain of debating with intelligent people. Be careful what you wish for ...
 

whitebb2727

Well-Known Member
You're safe with me in that regard. I'll always realize when you admit you are wrong. Even when you don't. Part of the service.

And yes, that is the joy AND pain of debating with intelligent people. Be careful what you wish for ...
Lol.

I'm not wrong often. I don't spend time randomly talking out of my ass.

Then you have another situation. Ask ten people how to do something and you might get ten answers. More than one way to skin a cat. Just because you and I get from a to b by a different path doesn't make either one of us wrong.

My best friend's dad growing up was a green beret in the army. A true bad ass. I've told it before. He was the guy in the attic with a .22 with a silencer shooting rats.

He went to a shooting event with some law enforcement. I know he could outshoot anyone there. He was humble and kept an open mind.

He told me to always be a sponge. You never know when you might learn something from somebody.
 

Xiu

Well-Known Member
I do not believe you can produce one single example of Annie responding thus, whether or not she likes her interlocutor. You project your likely answer onto her. Hmmmm.
I must have been unclear, I was speaking to the general board consensus about taking anything seriously. Have seen both “shut up” and “pussy”, not necessarily from C2G but when dealing with the expression of feelings.

Yeah last thing I would do is tell a new potential toy to shut up. I like a good fight. Oh and to answer Xiu yes on very rare occasions a peer review ended with, "That is Dr. Asshole to you!"

Practiced medicine is not science it's art and skill based on science. I am a mechanic god damnit. Singlemalt and you are the scientists. Don't tar me with that brush!

FUCK punctuation and publishing :) I'm a rebel practitioner.
It’s an unproductive argument to have. I don’t agree with fighting with the intention of hurting feelings, so I don’t do it. Some of you think all is fair on the internet and skin should be thicker. Is there a right and a wrong? That would entirely depend who you ask. Agree to disagree. I’m sure you’re a fine person and you don’t actually take pleasure in the misfortune of others.

Someone was supposed to be here last night with chocolates and lube…still waiting.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I must have been unclear, I was speaking to the general board consensus about taking anything seriously. Have seen both “shut up” and “pussy”, not necessarily from C2G but when dealing with the expression of feelings.



It’s an unproductive argument to have. I don’t agree with fighting with the intention of hurting feelings, so I don’t do it. Some of you think all is fair on the internet and skin should be thicker. Is there a right and a wrong? That would entirely depend who you ask. Agree to disagree. I’m sure you’re a fine person and you don’t actually take pleasure in the misfortune of others.

Someone was supposed to be here last night with chocolates and lube…still waiting.
No. You put those precise words into her e-mouth. Now you are backpedaling, trying to hide in vagary. It never was about general or consensus; it was you executing a finely-weighed and specific attack on one selected person. The term to cover your behavior is "dishonest". The smooth game of implication by which you don't REALLY say who is "fighting with an intention of hurting someone's feelings" is more plausible deniability to wrap around the sneaky way you've set up this post to be divisive.

You've been on this board under another name. I wonder why you chose to return with a blank-slate persona.

For clarity, here is the post in which you didn't REALLY presume upon the response.

Your peer reviews would bring up personal issues to discredit you? That does not sound scientific to me. More like politics.
It seems uncaring and callous to intentionally try to shame someone on personal matters in scientific debate.
You don't have to respond I know what's coming: "Shut up you pussy"
 

curious2garden

Well-Known Mod
Staff member
......snip...... I don’t agree with fighting with the intention of hurting feelings, so I don’t do it......snip........
We agree there. However if you launch a personal attack on me I'm not ignoring it simply because I may happen to have more education or a thicker skin. If you feel I come on to strongly I respect your right to put me on ignore. I do not insert myself into the middle of a conversation I have not even had the courtesy to read first, before judging subsequent posts. If a moderator feels I have crossed the line they will moderate me and my posts. I also respect your right to use the report button.

 

Xiu

Well-Known Member
No. You put those precise words into her e-mouth. Now you are backpedaling, trying to hide in vagary. It never was about general or consensus; it was you executing a finely-weighed and specific attack on one selected person. The term to cover your behavior is "dishonest". The smooth game of implication by which you don't REALLY say who is "fighting with an intention of hurting someone's feelings" is more plausible deniability to wrap around the sneaky way you've set up this post to be divisive.

You've been on this board under another name. I wonder why you chose to return with a blank-slate persona.

For clarity, here is the post in which you didn't REALLY presume upon the response.
Shut up, you pussy was what I expected from one of the lookie-loos. We can argue with my intention. I know what I was trying to say and you know what you Perceived.

We can go to the thread in question and I can show you what I found distasteful. Personally in my opinion. Which is different than yours. I'm not trying to fool anyone or persecute anyone. It was my perception and something I wouldn't have done. Based solely on the fact that some people think Everything's fair on the Internet when trying to prove a point. Or make someone else look bad.

We agree there. However if you launch a personal attack on me I'm not ignoring it simply because I may happen to have more education or a thicker skin. If you feel I come on to strongly I respect your right to put me on ignore. I do not insert myself into the middle of a conversation I have not even had the courtesy to read first, before judging subsequent posts. If a moderator feels I have crossed the line they will moderate me and my posts. I also respect your right to use the report button.

I believe I asked why you (or any member) were able to make fun of a personal issue with someone and not feel badly about it. I am unable to do that.

I received a response from another member that Internet banter should not hurt feelings. Asked and answered.
 
Last edited:

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
~snip~ I know what I was trying to say and you know what you Perceived.

We can go to the thread in question and I can show you what I found distasteful. Personally in my opinion. Which is different than yours. I'm not trying to fool anyone or persecute anyone. It was my perception and something I wouldn't have done. Based solely on the fact that some people think Everything's fair on the Internet when trying to prove a point. Or make someone else look bad.


I believe I asked why you (or any member) were able to make fun of a personal issue with someone and not feel badly about it. I am unable to do that.

I received a response from another member that Internet banter should not hurt feelings. Asked and answered.
The art of effective communication is tested by how well those two things match. If I do not know what you are trying to say, is it more likely to be a problem in Perception ... or expression?

The capitalization is a slick little move. I'll have to remember it when I want to subtly convey contempt of my convo partner's fail.
 

mr sunshine

Well-Known Member
Shut up, you pussy was what I expected from one of the lookie-loos. We can argue with my intention. I know what I was trying to say and you know what you Perceived.

We can go to the thread in question and I can show you what I found distasteful. Personally in my opinion. Which is different than yours. I'm not trying to fool anyone or persecute anyone. It was my perception and something I wouldn't have done. Based solely on the fact that some people think Everything's fair on the Internet when trying to prove a point. Or make someone else look bad.


I believe I asked why you (or any member) were able to make fun of a personal issue with someone and not feel badly about it. I am unable to do that.

I received a response from another member that Internet banter should not hurt feelings. Asked and answered.
You're sensitive because you're a girl, it's not your fault. FYI, that's also the reason you drive like shit
 

.Pinworm.

Well-Known Member
Shut up, you pussy was what I expected from one of the lookie-loos. We can argue with my intention. I know what I was trying to say and you know what you Perceived.

We can go to the thread in question and I can show you what I found distasteful. Personally in my opinion. Which is different than yours. I'm not trying to fool anyone or persecute anyone. It was my perception and something I wouldn't have done. Based solely on the fact that some people think Everything's fair on the Internet when trying to prove a point. Or make someone else look bad.


I believe I asked why you (or any member) were able to make fun of a personal issue with someone and not feel badly about it. I am unable to do that.

I received a response from another member that Internet banter should not hurt feelings. Asked and answered.
"it's only a forum; no skin off my ass how strangers talk to each other.
i have no desire to try to change anyone's behaviour."


http://rollitup.org/t/official-2017-pinworm-countdown-thread.903749/page-3#post-12449603

You were a lot cooler your first week here...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top