daloudpack
Well-Known Member
i can deal with a few seeds as long as im not INFESTED
Looks like nanners to me. If not genetic just try to reduce stress. Like bending. Cropping. Heat. Wind. Light leaks. One of these is most likely the culprit. But i do agree with shluby that some strains just always want to thrown em. Or ive got one liberty haze pheno that always did. While the other four never didokay her is my second question now is it possible that could be a crushed female calyx as ive been checking every thing very closely and pinching anything im suspicious of/ OR IS THIS SUMTHING COMPLETELY different.... ? some of the new growths ive been worried about being pollen sacks so i was tearing them off but after further review determined that is just new branching starting is it possible i split a calyx in the process or do the look different when split
add a 1/4 cup per cf after every grow.lol oh.... i never used OSF but from what sumone else was saying OSF doesnt last as long as dolo
Looks like nanners to me. If not genetic just try to reduce stress. Like bending. Cropping. Heat. Wind. Light leaks. One of these is most likely the culprit. But i do agree with shluby that some strains just always want to thrown em. Or ive got one liberty haze pheno that always did. While the other four never did
Here is an article that made me think twice about adding it. I never have added it and I have never had any problems.
http://www.smilinggardener.com/organic-soil-management/dolomite-lime
Cheers,
Mo
Here is the main problem with that article and the study it was based off of. It was a SOIL study, you know, actual dirt.
Our container mixes we make, SS, LC's recipes, FFOF, Roots are soil LESS. There is no actual dirt in them. The study makes sense for my raised bed gardens that contain a huge amount of native red clay and a CEC that's through the roof and I've read the study several times because it relates directly to that.
To my peat based soiless mix it has very little relevance. The only stuff that is in there is what I add, or what is added to bagged mixes. There are no native minerals.
It is a very basic point that everyone seems to miss, or, just not understand.
MO, this rant was NOT directed at you at all. It's common usage to call what are actually soiless mixes, soil, or soil mixes and it can be confusing. You just happened to post the link.
Wet
Thanks for the clarification. I am using promix based super soil and also growing directly in the ground. I have a clay soil I have been amending for years to get it to open up. Turns out all I needed were worms and compost.
I have been trying different ratios of clay to my SS mix and it takes very little to close up the soil so start small. It is amazing how much power a little clay has.
Interesting.Here is the main problem with that article and the study it was based off of. It was a SOIL study, you know, actual dirt.
Our container mixes we make, SS, LC's recipes, FFOF, Roots are soil LESS. There is no actual dirt in them. The study makes sense for my raised bed gardens that contain a huge amount of native red clay and a CEC that's through the roof and I've read the study several times because it relates directly to that.
To my peat based soiless mix it has very little relevance. The only stuff that is in there is what I add, or what is added to bagged mixes. There are no native minerals.
It is a very basic point that everyone seems to miss, or, just not understand.
MO, this rant was NOT directed at you at all. It's common usage to call what are actually soiless mixes, soil, or soil mixes and it can be confusing. You just happened to post the link.
Wet
Interesting.
I'm curious (and this isn't in a asinine way)
what exactly defines dirt/soil then? (again, asking in a peaceful way)
I was always under the understanding it was the content of biological life, humus, microbial life, etc, etc.
My understanding was a soil-less mix would be more like a promix or something of that like, and even still, peat is technically a compost (just a reaaaaally long composted one).
I view my "soil" as soil, the primary ingredient being a well composted leaf mold-mix.
but honestly it doesn't change anything, I could call it hippy-happy-humus-housing for my microbes.
Doesn't mean it's different.
Hmm actually has a nice ring to it...
Hippy-happy-humus-housing.
interesting, so we are indeed in a soil mix, as opposed to soil-less.you have inspired me to get my notebooks out from a few classes i took...
5 basic functions of soil:
-medium for plant growth (anchor point)
-system for water purification
-habitat for organisms
-modifier for the atmosphere (carbon cycle/hydrologic cycle/nitrogen cycle)
-recycling system (composting)
a 6th function is of engineering standpoint for foundation. but that's a whole nother perspective.
geologists and archeologists have their own definitions having more to do with the parent material/rocks and minerals.
definition of soil from my understanding of the soil management class: having the ability to retain water, and provide for the growth and habitat of plants and organisms. soil is alive!
dirt = the stuff you sweep up off of your floors in your house.
highly organic soil is anything with more than 25% OM. anything less is considered a mineral soil. but again that is for a natural soil, weathered parent material.
the more you break it down, the more technical you can get.
interesting, so we are indeed in a soil mix, as opposed to soil-less.
Good to know.
I'm confused on the "system for water purification " part though.
Ahh, gotcha.the soil is how ground water gets filtered/purified. as gravity pulls water down to the water table it is filtered through multiple horizons of different soils. and ground water is flowing which is filtering water very slowly.