so you don't even have the courtesy to be openly racist where you live? you pretend to not be racist?You might get away with saying that in the state of Washington cause it's full of soft little white boys like yourself, won't work here bro!
i was sardonically using the same word that beennowhere uses in a non-sardonic fashion.Over 24,000 posts and you say this? What did we ever do to you?
In the future do not try to be tan.i was sardonically using the same word that beennowhere uses in a non-sardonic fashion.
mccain was not incompetent, he had no support from the base, and no appeal to the right leaning independents, his record of being the guy the dems could count on to "compromise" on anything they wanted made him unacceptable for the hardline right, an unpalatable choice for the "moderates" and BHO was already the best candidate for all the leftists.Never mind that the other selection was incompetent and never mind that the other selection we have now is equaly so.
mccain was not incompetent, he had no support from the base, and no appeal to the right leaning independents, his record of being the guy the dems could count on to "compromise" on anything they wanted made him unacceptable for the hardline right, an unpalatable choice for the "moderates" and BHO was already the best candidate for all the leftists.
fred thompson would have mopped up the floor with BHO, as would alan keyes, and a half dozen other conservative candidates of note, while johm mccain was a half measure of lliberalism competing against a propper dose of marxism.
obama is a marxist. why is it so hard for marxists to admit their affiliation?Every time you have me admiring your intellectual flexability and open mindedness You come up with words like "marxism" in your posts.
you must know, seeing as how you can see through all of those code words and carefully couched phrases.obama is a marxist. why is it so hard for marxists to admit their affiliation?
i cant get christians to shut up about jeebus
nonsmokers wont stop yelling about the evils of smoking
vegans insist all must submit to their will
but marxists hide their beliefs behind code words, carefully couched phrases and bullshit. what are you scared of? i am an objectivist conservative republican constitutionalist who is also a polyhteist
what you hiding?
yeah i still got your slot saved, even if you are a silly commie. i actually LIKE communists. they share, and dont demand anything other than equal sharitude. a communist can live with sharing food, ammunition, weapons and whatnot, and still be ok with a guy who insists on having his own personal shoes (size 15EEEE boots aint easy to find even now, much less when zombies eat all the shoemakers...) i never met a real communist who objected to certain limits on sharing as long as those limits went both ways. if i got the last packet of instant coffe and he has the last packet of sugar i will totally share and share alike, but if he wont share that last sugar packet he wouldnt expect me to cough up half my last cuppa joe.you must know, seeing as how you can see through all of those code words and carefully couched phrases.
Marxist? sure.
But we can still be friends, you are still holding that place for me in your bunker aren't you?
Obama actually did the "books on tape" version. I've heard it. "Born in Kenya, educated in America, and raised in the world" said ObamaI have talked to several authors about the bios presented by their literary publicists. They all said the bios are written by the authors themselves.
Even if that is not true in Obama's case, do you really contend that Obama never read the bio used by his literary publicist? For sixteen years? And then, as if by magic, the mistake is discovered and corrected just when Obama runs for the presidency? No, that lie is owned by Obama.
Well then produce an excerptObama actually did the "books on tape" version. I've heard it. "Born in Kenya, educated in America, and raised in the world" said Obama
he was probably duped by a colleague on stormfront.Well then produce an excerpt
SHould be someplace on the internet
I concur. McCain was too far to the left to get out even the near right, let alone the far right. He could have defeated Obama if he didn't try to be the "nice guy" and remain silent about Obama's extreme leftist background. We seem to have the same "centrist" choice once again. The result may be different this time around, Obama is unlikely to get anywhere near the turn out this year. The Right is energized to defeat Obama. People don't seem to realize that the biggest factor in an election is whether your "supporters" actually take the time to vote. The number of Democrats outweighs the number of Republicans, but they don't win that many elections.mccain was not incompetent, he had no support from the base, and no appeal to the right leaning independents, his record of being the guy the dems could count on to "compromise" on anything they wanted made him unacceptable for the hardline right, an unpalatable choice for the "moderates" and BHO was already the best candidate for all the leftists.
fred thompson would have mopped up the floor with BHO, as would alan keyes, and a half dozen other conservative candidates of note, while johm mccain was a half measure of lliberalism competing against a propper dose of marxism.
alan keyes was running. the only person alan keyes beat in that election was rawn pawl.fred thompson would have mopped up the floor with BHO, as would alan keyes
Nominee | Barack Obama | Alan Keyes |
---|---|---|
Party | Democratic | Republican |
Popular vote | 3,597,456 | 1,390,690 |
Percentage | 70.0% | 27.0% |
I believe it was "you're gonna have to answer to the Coca-Cola company".To paraphrase Col. "Bat" Guano ... you'll have to answer to the ASPCA! cn
Thus the paraphrase. cnI believe it was "you're gonna have to answer to the Coca-Cola company".